Sections of the site
Editor's Choice:
- Ancient sovereign. Spur of the sovereign. Election of Saul as king
- The beard of the partisans in the Patriotic War of 1812
- Volyn Life Guards Regiment Listed in the lists of the regiment
- Guards units in the army: foundation, history
- Day of military glory of Russia - Day of the Battle of Borodino
- Biographies of the leaders of the secret office
- Sergei Platonov full course of lectures on Russian history
- Sergei Platonov - a full course of lectures on Russian history
- Who canceled the feeding system
- History of the Republic of Mordovia
Advertising
What happened three hundred years ago? Wave Antediluvian land that was 300 years ago |
Knowledge multiplies sorrow Dear readers, after reading this article, you will most likely have to conduct a complete revision of your knowledge gained at school and higher educational institutions, at least in such disciplines as history, geography, geology. So let's go. I show you the logical chain of my reasoning and conclusions. Babolovskaya bath. Granite. Weight 48 tons. Here is what a turner who visited her writes: Alexandrian column weighing 600 tons, 27 meters high. Granite. The shape is not a cone, but an entasis. It is impossible to make such a product without rotation in a lathe. Try to order a smaller copy of such a product with an IDEAL radius from any hard foam or wood turner at least 2 meters high and 30 cm in diameter, but requiring only hand tools (planers, chisels, sandpaper) and he will refuse. Peru, Ollantaytambo. Polygonal docking of blocks weighing 40-120 tons. You can see the fit level. The blocks are aligned in three planes. Cappella Sansevero: Il Disinganno. Made from one piece of marble. It is impossible to make something like this without an advanced CNC machine. Over the past 50 years, nothing even remotely similar in complexity of execution has been made by any sculptor. Even with CNC machines. marble tombstone at the Monumental Cemetery-Museum of Staglieno in Genoa. Stone bridge in Sevastopol. Each polygonal stone of the bridge is essentially a separate sculpture. An example of modern stone work behind the bridge on the left. Wall made of wild stone. By today's standards it is considered quite acceptable. Further, all the cities on the planet were built of stone in the antique style with pre-designed layouts of streets, avenues, embankments, etc. All cities had a stone bastion wall, the construction volume of which is often equal to the construction volume of the city itself. More on this in my article: In the region of 1780-1815, a thermonuclear war took place, most likely not for the first time on the planet, which resulted in the nuclear winter of 1816 - a year without a summer. The Anglo-Saxons call it Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death. I will also give a few screenshots from Google Earth, photos of nuclear craters on the territory, for example, Belarus. It is easy to find hundreds of such funnels in almost all countries. The white traces around the sinkholes are broken limestone, the main building material of that time. In the funnels of Belarus given as an example, there is water, since the level of groundwater is apparently high. But there are a lot of funnels without water on the surface of the planet. For example, in Ukraine: As a result of the nuclear winter, almost all plants froze to death and polar caps formed. This confirms the almost complete absence of trees older than 200 years in the northern hemisphere. Some of them burned out in the war, some froze. To visually evaluate this, type Roger Fenton Crimea or James Robertson Crimea in Google and click show pictures. You will see photographs of these two first war photographers sent to the Crimea in 1853 (already after the nuclear war, approximately 40 years later) to photograph the siege of Sevastopol. Compare vegetation then and now. Type in Google "Siberia photo of the 19th century." You will see many photographs from the end of the 19th century, in which trees have just begun to grow. For example, Sverdlovsk region: After this war, we rolled back in development, to the level of a feudal society. The Anglo-Saxons had a profit, since they got the least, they crushed the remnants of the world for 150 years for themselves, reinvented the steam engine on coal and off they go - now the era of oil and gas, nuclear energy and our industrial complex uses the entire periodic table, which he supposedly invented in a dream. In fact, she was simply thrown through it. Let's move on to the most interesting. I affirm that the current civilization is only a shadow of the bygone one. We are children compared to them. It is impossible to prove this through the industrial equipment of a past civilization, because it was simply disposed of, melted down. For example, after the collapse of the USSR, drunks dug trenches and cables and water pipes were taken out of the ground to be handed over to the metal collection point. But how to prove it? And it's easy. If the bygone civilization was much more developed than ours, then the entire periodic table was also needed for the functioning of its industrial-industrial and metallurgical complex. And all isotopes of elements. And there are almost all the elements of the periodic system in the rock and earth. So, I need to show you large-scale traces of the removal of rock from the slopes of the mountains, from the surface of the earth and from underground. As well as traces of processed waste rock after its enrichment at mining and processing plants of the past. This is what we'll do. I will use the analogy method, because it is very clear. Until the 18th century, residential buildings were built almost exclusively from limestone. 200 years pass, and in the days of the USSR, such limestone masonry is considered very good: Masonry quality as in the first photo is no longer used anywhere. This is called regression. Now we look at the volumes and for how long limestone, the main building material, was mined on this planet. On the example of the Crimea, since I am from here, the local landscapes and catacombs pushed me on the right path. This is Eski-Kermen. Illiterate guides will tell you that this is one of the cave cities of the Crimea, where people lived. When I asked about this track, I was told that this track was made by the cartwheels of the local nobility. Here is another "cave city" of Crimea - Chufut-Kale. And this is a modern Crimean limestone quarry. With a sawn-out quarryman's room. Apparently, there is a convenient tool to store. Mentally send this quarry into the future for 10,000-20,000 years, apply the effect of wind and water erosion to it, and what will you get as a result? right, another "cave city" of the Crimea. The track in the top photo, as you understand, was left by a trolley, on which the sawn stone was taken out. Although, in the post-nuclear era, the quarry is a good place for survivalists. Apparently, it was used as a protected town. Move on. There are thousands of kilometers of catacombs in Crimea where limestone was sawn. Volumes are simply prohibitive. Moreover, it is officially stated that the stone has been mined since the time of the "ancient Greeks", before our era. It was sawn with hand saws and mined with spade chisels. I went on an excursion to the Adzhimushkay quarries. Unfortunately, I didn't take a photo. Traces of circular saws are clearly visible on the ceiling, and the thickness of the disc is 4 mm. The diameter of the disk is about 2 meters - this is clearly visible on the walls, when the block was broken off after cutting, then in the place where the disk stopped, the diameter is clearly visible. Be in the catacombs pay attention. In this photo, taken before the revolution of 1917, you can see that a segment has been carefully sawn out of a limestone slope, at the bottom of which a railway passes and houses are built. Now a very important shot of the Inkerman quarry (the name of Champagne) taken in 1890. On it we see a sawn passage through a hill 100 meters wide and 80 meters high. Huge niches were cut through the walls, one-story houses stand in them. Under the vertical wall we see small substandard pieces of limestone piled up in the form of a slope and limestone chips that fell from under the saws. Some of these niches are the beginning of the catacombs that extend hundreds of kilometers inland. Large-scale underground limestone mining was carried out. During the Second World War, these catacombs housed a headquarters, a hospital, a tailoring shop, and warehouses. Trucks moved freely inside. During the retreat, the entrances were blown up. By the way, there are ancient catacombs under any city on the planet. Google it. Near Odessa, the length of the catacombs is 2500 km. And now we open the manipulation. What is served to you under the guise of rocks, canyons and gorges is nothing more than a career. Both very ancient quarries and relatively recent ones. Further more. Do you see this passage, from which a mass of limestone was seized in the Bakhchisarai region? He is given out for the valley. The slopes of limestone chips under the walls are already covered with oak forests: Compare the top photo of the "gorge" with Inkerman's photo from the 19th century. The embankments near the vertical walls of limestone chips have not yet been overgrown with forest: And a picture from 1855 of this place with an aqueduct on the other side. In the background, giant limestone quarries can also be seen. Clickable: Same. Bakhchisaray district This picture shows the town. It is located at the bottom of an ancient quarry. But it is called the valley, which was washed by the river. That's bullshit. On the contrary, after this mountain sinking, water from a broken aquifer flowed along the bottom of the quarry, or a stream that used to flow along a different route turned here. This is the norm of the day in any career. The river cannot wash out the mountain range that stands in its way. He will be a dam in her path. Many of you who are older have seen in your childhood streams that flow from a vertical wall of limestone. For 30-40 years, this stream has increased the diameter of the hole from which it flows? That's it. Well, the scale of stone mining in the small Crimea impresses you? Looking ahead, I will say that this is still trifles. On this planet there is not a single cube of rock, probably 100 meters deep across the entire area, which would not have been mined, ground, chewed and thrown away in due time. This is not a planet, this is a giant quarry where the entire periodic table is mined in the most barbaric way. And now look at the photo and pay attention to the longline structure of quarries and mines. Extraction of iron ore at the Lebedinsky deposit by open blasting. Magnetic mountain, Ural Cheremshan nickel mines Copper mines, Kennecott Utah Usa Vostok Ore Quarry. Bingham Canyon Copper Quarry in Utah, USA Magnesium quarry in Navarra Rotary excavator. Power consumption in the region of 4-5 megawatts. But more on them later. Just remember how he chooses the breed. Forms, in fact, a canyon with large tiers. A rotary excavator cuts the mountain range in tiers. Formed a structure with right angles when viewed from above. Another excavator chose the rock in a semicircle in front of him And now I will show you mountains, mountain ranges, gorges, canyons in places that are practically uninhabited now with various romantic names. Often they are named after some "discoverer". Do academicians and professors from geology and geography really not see this? "Mountain" on the Kola Peninsula. I don't know the name. "The mountains". Antarctica. Selected in a semicircle rock by a bucket wheel excavator in Antarctica, which was only discovered in 1820! Antarctica. There are even traces of the tracks of heavy equipment preserved. Greenland. Watkins mountains. How do you like the scale of production? Greenland. Frankfurt-Los Angeles flight. Gunnbjorn. The highest mountain in Greenland. 3700 meters. Not a problem. Gutted almost completely. Svalbard, Norway. Aurora Borealis in front of a quarry Antarctica. Transantarctic Mountains. Traces of technology are still visible at the foot Antarctica. Transantarctic Mountains. Quarry system. Pay attention to the background. Mount Kailash. Tibet. Height 6638 meters! Have you seen that in our time heavy mining equipment was raised to such a height? Mount Kailash. Tibet. Goblin Valley, State Park Utah, Usa Gloss Mountains State Park, Oklahoma, USA. The height of cynicism is to call worked-out quarries national parks. Now take a deep breath and look with wide eyes. Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA. It's just a giant quarry. Gutted territory. Millions of tourists think that this is almost a wonder of the world, because they were told so. Grand Canyon Quarry, Arizona, USA. There are no signs of water erosion anywhere. Only shock-explosive impact on the rock. Quarry - Rocks of the Svalbard Archipelago Quarry Grand Canyon. Cutting stone with a circular saw. Quarry in Australia. Blue Mountains Blue Mountains from a different angle Blue Mountains. vertical wall. Compare it with the wall of a marble quarry in the Alps, which has not yet been subjected to water and air erosion: Marble mining in the Alps Giant quarry. I do not know where. The photo is offered as wallpaper on the desktop all over the Internet. Caprock Canyons State Park Texas. Again a national park created from a spent quarry in the United States In worked-out quarries where there is a lot of moisture, people are engaged in farming - Banaue Rice Terraces Banaue Rice Terraces And here is Canyon De Chelly National Monument. USA. National monument. Here, apparently, mountain driving was done with saws. Painted Hills - painted hills in Oregon. Mountain Ravine. Impressive volumes. South Africa. Orange River and mountains. Timna national park in Israel. Timna Quarry in Israel Green Canyon Quarry in China Flooded quarry - Chervak reservoir in Uzbekistan. Flooded quarry Chervak reservoir in Uzbekistan. Another angle I'll tell you more. It seems that there are no natural mountains and gorges on this planet. See the photo? This is a giant quarry. Although there are no obvious tiers, it is clear that this is a quarry. I trust my intuition. Now let's move on to the scariest part. Now I will show you how deserts are created on Earth. Note how the bucket wheel excavator removes layer upon layer of rock from large areas. One more picture. There are 2 of them here. They immediately remove two layers from one area. In the lower left corner, a large bulldozer rides. Assess the scale. This photo is clickable. The excavator removes a layer 30-40 meters high. The bottom of the quarry is a huge area and it is absolutely flat like a table. Convenient to move the excavator. A couple more photos It turns out that on our planet there are quarries the size of several countries or the size of an entire desert. For example, on the territory of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Iran, there are no fertile soils for the most part, because a layer of rock 100 meters thick was removed from almost the entire area of \u200b\u200bthese countries, along with soil and all living things. It's hard to believe, but you have to believe your eyes. It looks like the Aral Sea and the Caspian Sea are gigantic flooded quarries. Yes, all the areas on the planet painted yellow in Google maps are the bottom of quarries. The Boszhira tract is located in the western part of the Ustyurt plateau. Kazakhstan. Can you see that the hills behind the Volkswagen are a wall formed by a bucket wheel excavator? Ustyurt Plateau. Clickable. There is a group of cars in the middle of the picture. As far as the eye can see, the top layer of soil 100 meters thick has been removed. If you splash water here with a layer of 15 meters, you get an analogue of the Sea of \u200b\u200bAzov. Sea of Azov. Flooded old quarry. The bottom is as flat as a table on which bucket-wheel excavators rolled. The maximum depth is 15 meters. They may have mined thorium. Type in Google - the radioactive sands of Azov. The edge of the Karakum desert. Area 350,000 km². Clickable. The impression that some kind of planetary ripper worked on the planet. In reality, a quarry. For the population - Yangikala Canyon. Turkmenistan. In reality, a quarry. For the population - the Tuzbair Plateau. Kazakhstan USA, Monument Valley. Clickable. Previously, the area of \u200b\u200bthis territory was as high as the top of the stub straight ahead. A layer several hundred meters high has been dug. USA, Monument Valley. It's the same here Namibia. The desert is the bottom of a quarry Egypt. The top layer is removed along with the soil. They also burned it with a nuclear one. Most of Australia is hidden clean. There is no soil, all red desert. Australia. Nigeria. Desert. The conclusion is this for the deserts: they are completely anthropogenic. Appeared as a result of long-term metallurgical activity. And even more than that. Feel free to replace words in your vocabulary canyon, gorge, rock, ravine, plateau, mountain lake, just a lake- for words quarry, mine And flooded quarry, flooded mine. On old foreign maps of the 16th and 17th centuries, where the territory of Ukraine, Russia and other former republics is often marked as Tartaria, the rivers flow more or less straight, gently turning. Modern rivers in this area meander strongly, sometimes turning 180 degrees. Here, for example, is a screenshot of the Tobol River in Siberia: One bank of such rivers is often higher than the other, and this is explained by the strength of Coreolis. I propose not to touch Coreolis and take a look at the following short video of the ERSHRD 5000 bucket wheel excavator and 2 photos of a river in Russia. Sorry for the mat in the video, but it is very visual. And now a photo of the river in the Voronezh region. The place is called "Krivoborye". The river has never flowed through this loop before. It flowed here when the height of the landscape changed after the removal of soil by a bucket wheel excavator. Krivoborye from a different angle. On an island in the middle, overgrown with bushes, stood a rotary excavator. And what does official science tell us about this career? I quote: While all the geologists of the planet are unsuccessfully restoring what natural events took place in Krivoborye several millennia ago, I will do it for them - a bucket wheel excavator 200-300 years ago, judging by the unshaken slope. And this situation is typical for the whole planet. Often in a conversation you can hear accusations of cospirology. They say that it is impossible to hide anything from society. And there is some truth in this. Why hide when everything is in plain sight and no one sees? Or here's another chutzpah. Obviously, a rotary excavator worked on limestone in Switzerland. But people are being told: Siberia. Anabar Plateau. Jogjo River Move on. These are waste heaps with waste rock from the Donbass. Their height sometimes reaches 300 meters. Chemical reactions take place inside them, they burn and sometimes explode when excess pressure builds up inside. And further And this is just a waste heap of Vesuvius in Italy with a height of 1281 meters. But it was called a volcano because it burns and exploded once. And they called it that so you wouldn't guess :) Shall we take a look at his caldera? If it's a volcano, then the walls of the caldera must be melted down by liquid lava. And if the waste heap, then the walls will be layered and will consist of crumbly rock that can be dug with a shovel. We look carefully. And what do we see? Terrikon. And this is the Klyuchevsky hill. Lit. 4850 meters. The Taranaki slag heap in New Zealand. Well, where are the frozen crystallized lava flows? The slopes are entirely composed of loose rock. And this is the Santa Anna slag heap in El Salvador Exploded top of the slag heap of Popocatepetl in Mexico. Height 5426 meters. Terrikon Maly Semyachik, Kamchatka Territory Tolbachik Haven't saved 4 paychecks yet to visit the slopes of the Fujiyama slag heap in Japan? Hurry, it's worth it :) We've dealt with the terrikons. Now let's move on to the dumps, which do not have a pronounced conical shape. Here the rule is that if it is loose, layered and can be dug with a shovel, then most likely a dump of waste rock that our ancestors piled up in a hurry to live. For example, a chic geological park in China Zhangye Danxia. Colored mountains, beauty. Under state protection, of course. Tourists are driven exclusively along paved paths so that, God forbid, tourists do not fall into this toxic waste hen. Dump - Mount Schmidtikh, Norilsk Or, for example, you are walking along the valley of the Sugran River, in the Pamirs. Heaps of some kind of earth are piled around, nothing grows. And these are dumps. The mountains of Pyatigorsk are very similar to waste heaps The Philippines is one of the most desirable places to visit on the planet, and if you don't know much about the Philippines, then you should definitely listen to the world-famous island of Bohol. It became famous thanks to the "chocolate hills", which stretched over an area of about 50 square kilometers, in the amount of 1268 regular cone-shaped hills up to 100 meters high. In general, you understand the principle. We saw a hill near the house - take a closer look, think about it. Most likely it will be man-made. An important addition about mining waste from a blogger mylnikovdm
The conclusions of this story can be drawn as follows: 2. People come and go, states appear and collapse, nations are formed, clash foreheads and disappear. One thing doesn't change:- God's millstones grind slowly but surely The end point of our route, apparently the same as in the picture below. But even so, God's millstones will most likely not stop, so we humans will kindly design and build self-replicating robots by the time they take our place. They will not depend on the composition of the atmosphere, and we will go down in history. By the way, now you know what the "volcanoes" on Mars are :) But the logic of the process suggests that those who profit from this will not be very upset by our departure from the stage. Apparently, he is not here, he does not live here. I would like to know who this person is. As we all know, between the Lord (master), whose name cannot be named and you need to write through a dash like G-d and we are intermediaries - God's chosen ones. They would have to ask. Ordinary Jews hardly even knew what I showed in this post. But seniors know for sure. Start asking. We need a dialogue on this. In general, Judaism and religions derived from it, in the light of the revealed facts, seem to be a planetary management system - a quarry for a percentage. From time to time, when employees get into the topic and start to rebel, it is necessary to arrange a restart of the system by organizing wars and a generation gap. And since we got the idea what's what, it will probably start soon :) But what to be, it cannot be avoided. Power is in the truth. And the truth is that a society that lives in a closed system, continuously reproducing and determined to consume more tomorrow than yesterday - is doomed as soon as it reaches the ceiling on the amount of available energy or territory. It is possible to develop and multiply infinitely only in the infinite Universe. If we do not break out of the Earth quarry, we are doomed. But on the other hand, if they wanted to hide it, then Sergey Brin would never have made a public service Google Maps, Google Images, and just Google. And no one would ever collect material on this topic in a heap in one place. So, not everything is so simple. And for a snack, I want to show a couple of videos on the topic: And the second one: Bye then! Look for those who know the answers to questions and feel free to ask. Original taken from MOSCOW, June 7 - RIA Novosti. Paleontologists have discovered in Morocco today the oldest remains of modern humans, Homo sapiens, whose age is at least 300 thousand years old and suggests that people appeared much earlier than was commonly believed, according to an article published in the journal Nature. "These ancient hominids, especially one of the women, if dressed in modern clothes, combed and released into the crowd of modern people, would absolutely not stand out against their background. They would look completely normal in the eyes of the townsfolk, and would stand out from the crowd only with an unusually elongated skull and "stocky" body, visible to professional anthropologists," says Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. Dark Ages of Humanity Until recently, anthropologists and paleontologists believed that modern man, Homo sapiens, originated in East Africa about 200 thousand years ago, several hundred thousand years after the separation of the ancestors of Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons. The first people, as shown by excavations, penetrated into the Middle East about 70 thousand years ago, and into Europe - about 45 thousand years ago. Scientists: Neanderthals interbred with humans already 100 thousand years agoScientists have found inclusions of the human genome in the oldest samples of Neanderthal DNA from the Altai, which tell us that the first people entered Asia already 100 thousand years ago, long before the migration of the Cro-Magnons to Europe.On the other hand, the findings of recent years and genetic studies suggest that people could have left Africa much earlier, at least 130 thousand years ago, and contacted Neanderthals for a long time. Moreover, South Africa also claims to be the ancestral home of mankind today, in the caves of which scientists recently found Cro-Magnon tools aged 150 thousand years and the remains of Homo naledi, potential human ancestors who lived in the Naledi cave about 330 thousand years ago. Ublin and his colleagues say that in fact, neither region can claim the role of the "ancestral home" of mankind, based on the finds they made at the Jebel Iroud site in northwestern Morocco. The first excavations, according to Ublin, began here back in the 1960s, when local miners working on pyrite deposits accidentally stumbled upon a layer of sedimentary rocks in which they found a skull and other human remains, stone tools dating back to the Middle Paleolithic, and many bones of gazelles, wildebeest and other animals. The skulls and bones of the people found in this mine were very similar to the remains of modern Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, which is why the chief geologist of the mine and the scientists from the University of Rabat, to whom he gave this remains, did not give them much attention. They considered that these Cro-Magnons or Neanderthals were buried in the soil quite recently, about 40 thousand years ago, in the era of the colonization of the Earth by the first tribes of people. Ublin says his team began excavating at Jebel Irud in 2004, trying to find new human remains, classify them and calculate their age. In total, scientists were able to find 22 fragments of human skulls and bones belonging to five different individuals - one man, two children and two women. Paleontological pan-Africanism The shape of the bones and especially the skull, as the scientist recalls, immediately indicated that they were dealing with ancient Homo sapiens, and not Neanderthals or the alleged common ancestors of man and the first "natives of Europe." The inhabitants of Jebel Irud generally resembled modern humans, except that they had a heavier build, a slightly elongated skull, and a less developed brain.
This discovery led paleontologists to seek the help of physicists, who helped them accurately measure the dates of burial of skulls and bones from the isotope fractions of uranium and other heavy elements contained inside the tools burned in the hearths of the inhabitants of Jebel Irud. When Ublin and his colleagues saw these dates, they realized that they were actually dealing with potentially the oldest remains of modern humans on Earth - their age exceeded 300 thousand years, which is 100 thousand years older than the age of the oldest remains of people from Ethiopia. This discovery, as the paleontologist notes, completely overturns our ideas about the evolution of mankind. It turns out that modern people spread and existed in three different parts of Africa already 300 thousand years ago. This, accordingly, suggests that the species Homo sapiens arose much earlier than previously thought - at least several tens of thousands of years before the mark of 300 thousand years and not earlier than 650 thousand years ago, when the ancestors of Neanderthals and humans separated. Scientists have found the remains of the oldest representative of the genus Homo in EthiopiaFlora and fauna in Lady Guerarou experienced a drought period about 2.8 million years ago, but it's too early to say that climate change has led to the emergence of the genus Homo, explains Kay Reid of the University of Arizona in Tucson. She notes that this would require a larger set of early hominin fossils."People often do not realize that there are two completely different questions - the origin of our species, Homo sapiens, and the emergence of modern humans, absolutely similar to us. Our discovery only addresses the first question, and we are only talking about the fact that people began to spread across Africa earlier than 300 thousand years ago. It is possible that some kind of "cradle of mankind" existed, but we still have no hints of where it could be - in the south, in the east, and maybe in the north of Africa, " the scientist explained in an interview with RIA Novosti. According to Ublin, the problem may actually be even wider - it is quite possible that the metaphorical "Gardens of Eden" where the first people appeared did not exist, and that modern people are the product of the "co-evolution" of several populations of members of the genus Homo. They could contact each other and live in different parts of Africa, periodically falling into isolation due to the formation and disappearance of deserts. "We assume that early people existed in all regions of Africa and gradually evolved towards the growth and complexity of their brain, periodically exchanging genes during periods of favorable climate. And therefore we believe, and in the past I was of the opposite opinion, that some kind of solitary " Gardens of Eden "did not exist. If they were, then they should be called the whole of Africa as a whole," Ublin concludes. Original taken from astlena in Original taken from yuri_shap2015 in Traces of the FLOOD in the North of the European part of Russia The assumption that at a distance of several hundred years ago, from the North to the European part of Russia, the “Big Water” came, which, most likely, washed away the previous highly developed culture and civilization of our country, is indirectly confirmed by many evidence. The answer to this question is the presence of high mountains in the North-West of the Scandinavian Peninsula, namely in Norway and Sweden. Here's what they look like in real life
"Information about the Norwegian mountains It was the mountains of the Scandinavian Peninsula that "covered" the North-West of Russia from the destructive flow. Since the shock wave of the waters of the Arctic Ocean cut through the high-mountainous western coast of Norway, and directed its destructive force along the coast, to the south and east of the peninsula. By the way, it is thanks to Norway that Sweden appears in the “wars” of the 18th and 19th centuries. Most likely, it is one of the few countries in Europe that suffered less then. The coast near the Arctic Ocean has been cleaned to a granite base: Surface cleaned to the ground. There are boulders everywhere. The northernmost cities over 200 years old are Vologda, Vyatka (Kirov), Perm. All other cities to the north, this is the end of the 19th, or the 20th century. Excerpts: “Along the banks of the largest river in the north, the Northern Dvina, there is a unique ancient city of Arkhangelsk. Here, systematic construction began in 1794 according to a plan drawn up by the government. The new plan included all the old buildings, which were made of wood and stone. The new construction plan implied wide streets, which were supposed to run in a direction parallel to the Northern Dvina embankment .... ... The oldest building of the present Arkhangelsk is the Gostiny Dvor, standing on the banks of the Northern Dvina, near Cape Pur-Navolok, on which the city was founded in 1583 ... ....at the end of the 18th century, only the Russian Gostiny Dvor remained, which was converted in 1788 into a customs house. By the beginning of the 20th century, about half of it remained - the wall facing the Dvina and one of the side walls. ???? Is there anything else in the northwest of Russia that could be a confirmation of the catastrophe? Let's look at other areas of the North-West region, for example, the Pskov region. And in the Pskov region there are cities whose name, for a fairly flat territory, raises questions: Ostrov is a city, a regional center in the Pskov region. "The exact date of the founding of the city of Ostrov is not known. It is assumed that it already existed in the 13th century. "Supposedly, the fortress was originally wooden and by the middle of the XIV century could no longer hold back the growing onslaught of the Livonian Order. Then the Pskovites took measures to strengthen the Island: on a low island formed by the Velikaya River and the Slobozhikhaya canal, a stone fortress was built from gray limestone, which was the largest military-defensive structure of Ancient Russia at that time. The shape of the fortress corresponded to the relief of the area occupied by it: the walls surrounded the most elevated part of the island, separated from the rest by a moat. The defense power was strengthened by five towers, the main entrance to the fortress was located in the northwestern part, had a zahab. In addition to the main gate in the fortress, there were also small additional gates - "temporary". In addition to the quadrangular (Nikolskaya) tower, there were three other round ones at the corners of the fortress. The lower coal was located on the northeast corner of the fortress. The other two were called the Upper Corner Towers. The water supply of the fortress was organized in a peculiar way: in the eastern part of the fortress, near the Upper Towers, there was a canal called the Ropotukha River, in its bed there was a well. Here is what I think is IMPORTANT: Other settlements of the Pskov region: For the first time, the villages of Dno Bolshoye and Dontse Menshoe of the Shelon Pyatina of the Novgorod Land were mentioned in cadastral books at the beginning of the 15th century. Since the middle of the 16th century, the village of Dontse Lesser has not been mentioned anywhere, there are two versions - either it was abandoned after the plague that raged in 1550, or it merged with the Big Bottom .... The church was built in 1821 by Major General Lozhdurov to commemorate the victory and memory of those killed in the war of 1812. A feature of ALL lakes in the Pskov region is their multi-meter layer of silt-sapropel. With rather poor vegetation of the region, and a fairly flat landscape, the question is: where did billions of tons of it accumulate there. The prolonged presence of a glacier does not increase organic residues in water bodies. From the same series, an abundance of swamps. Quote: ...Consequently, the main reason for the massive swamping of water bodies at the beginning of the post-glacial period on the territory of the Valdai glaciation, including the Pskov region, should be considered the descent of lakes by rivers. I draw your attention to the fact that the lakes and swamps of the region are gradually drying up. And for the last century, very significantly. The rate of drying speaks of hundreds, but not thousands of years from the moment of their formation. There is such a term, “Bouldered soils”. What does official science tell us about this?: It seems that in the north-west of Russia, cataclysms happened periodically, here is how historians describe the past of the region: "Today we have every reason to write down for ourselves the installation that the territory of Russia in 1815-1816 became a testing ground for grandiose events, accompanied by the release of a large amount of dust into the stratosphere, plunging the entire northern hemisphere into darkness and cold for 3 years. Scientists call it's a "little ice age", but you can also say it in another way - a "little nuclear winter" It caused a lot of casualties among our population and probably greatly undermined the economy. It is also important to know that someone really needed this hide..."
Schepetnev Vasily Pavlovich From the book "Singers of Hell" Moscow, 1812 But how did the nuclear bomb end up in the past? First, the cause of the explosion could not be a bomb, but a meteorite fall from antimatter. The theoretical probability of such an event is insignificant, but not zero. Secondly, at the request of the Russian authorities, a blow could have been delivered by the "Great Ancients", a crypto-civilization inhabiting underground Russia. This assumption is also supported by Kutuzov's decision to leave Moscow after the general battle won, and the massive evacuation of the population from the city, unprecedented at that time. The authorities decided to sacrifice buildings in the name of the death of the enemy. The last, most likely, but at the same time, most frightening assumption is that the harmonica of a much later - and much more powerful - nuclear explosion reached Moscow in 1812. There is a theory that part of the energy released during an uncontrolled nuclear reaction moves in time both into the past and into the future. It was from the future that the echo of a nuclear explosion reached Napoleon's army. The French emperor, who was in a stone building at the time of the explosion, received a relatively small dose of radiation, which affected only the island of St. Helena ... The causes of the famous Moscow fire of 1812 were reluctantly discussed. For the Russians, the very fact of surrendering the ancient capital to the desecration of the Napoleonic troops was extremely unpleasant, and an extra reminder of this was not welcome. For the French, the burning of a huge city was also a shameful event, incompatible with the role of an advanced civilized nation, which they undoubtedly considered themselves to be. And there were few witnesses to the fire who could clearly and in detail tell about what had happened: Muscovites, especially the educated classes, left the city, many invaders died during the inglorious flight from Russia. Three versions prevail: the French burned Moscow on purpose; Moscow was deliberately burned by Russian patriots; Moscow caught fire from the neglect of both the invaders and the remaining extremely small population. In the novel "War and Peace" Leo Tolstoy, after examining the possible versions, came to the conclusion: Moscow could not help but burn down, because in the absence of a firm order, any, even a minor fire, threatens the whole city with ashes. A recent discovery allows us to make a new, completely unexpected assumption. Last year, a Moscow official bought a neglected estate in the south of France, near Toulon. After taking ownership, he started repairing an old mansion and, while preparing furniture for restoration, in one of the secret drawers of his desk, he discovered the diary of a certain Charles Artois, a lieutenant of the Napoleonic army. The diary described the events in Moscow and the details of the return of the army from Russia. Now the manuscript is undergoing a series of examinations, but thanks to the courtesy of the owner, we managed to get acquainted with excerpts from it. “I was standing in the courtyard of a large Russian house. The low sun flooded Moscow with a golden light. Suddenly, a second sun lit up, bright, white, dazzling. ", resting on the balcony. The walls and roof of the house began to smoke. I ordered the soldiers to pour several dozen buckets of water on the roof, and only thanks to these measures it was possible to save the estate. In other estates located closer to the newly appeared luminary, fires started. It was this mysterious celestial flash and caused a terrible fire that destroyed Moscow ... " The description of the flight of Napoleonic troops from Russia is curious. As you know, the French had to retreat (in fact, the composition of Napoleon's army was multinational, the French themselves were a minority in it) had to go along the devastated Smolensk road. The lack of food and fodder, the lack of winter uniforms turned the once mighty army into a crowd of desperate, dying people. But are General Frost and General Famine the only ones to blame for the diseases that struck the army? Let's go back to September 1812, the Grand Army is still in Moscow. "Fires continue around. The estate where we are quartered survived, but, as luck would have it, a new misfortune struck our ranks. Rotten Russian water, intemperance in food or some other reason, but all our people suffer from the most severe bloody diarrhea. Weakness in all members, dizziness, nausea, turning into indomitable vomiting, add misfortunes. And we are not alone in this situation - all the battalions of our regiment, all the regiments in Moscow. Doctors suspect dysentery or cholera, and recommend leaving the inhospitable city as soon as possible. Pierre Duroy arrived just now. His detachment stands ten miles from the Moscow outpost, everyone is healthy and cheerful, however, the Russian partisans are disturbing. Seeing our deplorable state, he immediately turned back, afraid of catching an infection ... " A week later, the lieutenant remarks: "Hair began to fall out. I shared this sad discovery with Zhirden - but he has the same troubles. I'm afraid that soon our entire detachment - but what a detachment, the whole regiment will become a regiment of bald..." "Many horses are seriously ill, which baffles veterinarians. Like biped healers, they claim that the whole reason is in the malignant miasma dissolved in the Moscow air..." “Finally, the decision has been made: we are leaving Moscow. We are leaving without having achieved anything, stricken with illness, weakened, weak, powerless. condition..." The pages describing the way back are heavy and mournful: the Artois detachment lost people every day, but not in battles - they were unable to fight - but from weakness and exhaustion caused by a mysterious illness. Even the meager provisions that could be obtained were not for the future, they simply could not digest it. The soldiers were covered with abscesses and ulcers. Both people and horses perished. Those units that did not enter Moscow fought off the Russians, but their ranks were melting, while the Russian army only grew stronger. Most of the Napoleonic army perished in the vastness of Russia. Charles Artois was lucky: a strong spirit subjugated a weak body. The illness left him disabled. Therefore, immediately upon his return to France, he received a resignation, but did not live long and died at the age of thirty-two years childless. The new owner of the estate (in addition, a candidate of physical and mathematical sciences), having read the manuscript and consulted with experts, suggested that the army that occupied Moscow in 1812 was subjected to a nuclear air strike! Light radiation caused fires, and penetrating radiation caused acute radiation sickness, which crippled the army. Copyright Schepetnev Vasily Pavlovich ([email protected] )Alexey Kungurov - Tale of our true historyThe more seriously you begin to study history, the more you begin to understand that absolutely everything in it is distorted and deliberately turned upside down! They are trying to hide something from us, something very important for us, necessary for survival... What happened 200 years ago? On the issue of falsification of history and crippled consciousness My research into the correspondence with the truth of the official version of history began with small observations and information received in personal communication. The essence of the information was reduced to the assertion that until recently there was a nuclear war all over the world and after that we were occupied and history was rewritten(including our consciousness was broken by this action). This information itself turned out to be so shocking, unusual and completely contradictory. everyone our habitual knowledge, beliefs and views, which was not immediately seriously considered by me. Many of us have read many books in our lives, including those on history, about Borodino, about brave knights, about Robin Hood, about Denis Davydov, etc. Many have watched quite a lot of popular science films on similar topics (and feature films glorifying the exploits of heroes). Some have visited museums displaying mammoth bones, primitive man's tools, and, the most important thing - evidence that era- copper cannons, uniforms of Russian soldiers and commanders, weapons of those times. Doubts about authenticity The official version of the story did not appear to me immediately, but after the discovery of a number of objects, the so-called. artifacts, the existence of which historians have not even tried to somehow clearly explain. The marble sarcophagus, exhibited in the Historical Museum, located on the Red Square of Moscow, can be safely attributed to such artifacts. This sarcophagus (photo below) is similar to the sarcophagus of the Altai Princess, described in the article "Tisulskaya find". marble sarcophagus The most interesting thing is that although it was allegedly found in a different place, it seems to be only two and a half thousand years old, but it was made with a quality that is difficult for us to achieve even now. Then, examining other extraordinary objects, for example, the Atlantes of the Hermitage (photo below) and their level of manufacture, I managed to assume that the sarcophagus and the Atlantes were made of geopolymer concrete. Atlantes of the Hermitage It turns out that both 2500 years ago and 200 years ago our ancestors knew the secret of geopolymer concrete, and we, with our level of development, were able to rediscover this material only at the end of the 20th century. And if only 200 years ago it was the most common material, then, what happened such that so sharply shortened our memory and impoverished our knowledge? All studies, the results of which were published in official sources, did not provide answers to the questions asked that arose in the analysis of this amazing information. Therefore, based on the "technological method of reconstruction", successfully applied Alexey Artemiev and described by him in the article "Cities of Masters", a method was proposed for studying the authenticity of history, based on the reconstruction of the technological level of development of society, necessary for the manufacture of artifacts and (or) the construction of mega-buildings. After all, knowing the tool, we can assume that it can be made, and, seeing the manufactured object, we can determine the tool. For example: if we find a modern T-80 tank in the tomb of Tutankhamun, then we can assume that at the time of its manufacture there were lathes, rolling mills, a developed electronic industry commensurate with our modern one. The objects of my research megaliths and incredible (in importance and beauty) buildings became. As a result of these studies, described in the article, it was found that many buildings and structures built 200-300 years ago, for example, such as the Hermitage, St. Isaac's and Kazan Cathedrals, the Alexandria Column, were made using technologies whose level far exceeded the level of society of the time described by official history. hermitage Museum Saint Isaac's Cathedral Kazan Cathedral Alexandrian column Moreover, it turned out that 200 or more years ago, many buildings built in different parts of the world were built using the same technologies and in the same cultural tradition. For example, such buildings as: the British Museum, the White House in Washington, the Capitol, the lesser-known church on top of the pyramid in Mexico and the mosque near Baalbek (see photo below). British museum White House Capitol Church at the top of the pyramid in Mexico Mosque near Baalbek Construction with the massive use of huge columns of monolithic rocks everywhere and immediately stopped approximately at the turn 1812-1815. About megaliths, such as the Egyptian Pyramids, Baalbek and the like, modern science generally cannot or does not want to report anything reliable. All this is very reminiscent of bedtime stories (technologies of the "Egyptian slaves"). But the technique of making megaliths required a level of technological development, at least commensurate with ours. All theories about the origin of these objects are built on the assumption that they were built by “someone else”: Gods, Aliens, Atlantes, etc., since people at that moment were allegedly wild (undeveloped) and could not (definitely could not ) to build such objects. Such structures as St. Isaac's Cathedral and the Alexander Column can rightfully be equated with megalithic structures, since their construction uses elements hundreds and thousands of times greater in mass than the physical capabilities of an ordinary person and requiring the use of specialized devices with powerful drives during transportation and processing . Further exploration of artifacts revealed a number of very interesting features in the psychology of people. When we tell people about such familiar things as a baluster for a staircase turned on a machine, this does not surprise anyone. Baluster for stairs, turned on the machine But, as soon as it comes to the columns of St. Isaac's Cathedral - structures that are figures of rotation the size of an 8-9-story building - then a certain filter turns on in everyone's brain, and people foaming at the mouth begin to prove that such a product is made manually, because they are sure that at that time it could only be done by hand! St. Isaac's Cathedral columns Allegedly, at that time there could not be machine technologies, because it was the 17th-18th or the beginning of the 19th century. I.e, people just can't believe their eyes and thoughtlessly deny the obvious. In theory such an object as a column weighing several tens of tons can be made by hand, if you mess around for a very long time and scrupulously. But any wrong move with the cutter will leave a deep scratch or chip (and chipping is inevitable), which will be very difficult, if not impossible, to fix. But it is really impossible to repeat this manufacturing operation 64 times in a short time. Many opponents assumed that the columns for the St. Petersburg Cathedrals were made using concrete technology. The presence of technological patches on the columns and the structure of the material indicate that it was a monolithic material that was used. Technological patches on columns Column material structure Further research Petersburg artifacts, described in the article "Historical Myths and Reality", revealed that most of the historical documents describing the time and method of construction, upon detailed examination, turned out to be simply fakes. The results of all these observations and studies do not fit into the ideas that official historical science has imposed on us. Most historians build their conclusions on the basis of the official version of the chronology, unaware that it is based on falsified documents and representations. Later, after several conferences, many other people joined my research. Messages came from different cities and from different people. Did a lot of research Alexey Artemiev. He proved that at the turn of 1814-1816 such a phenomenon as a climate shift occurred (see his article “I had a dream ... Not everything in it was a dream”), the facts of real bombings (articles and), found real funnels from nuclear explosions ( see two photos below), described them, although most of these funnels are difficult to see from the ground and are visible only from space (photo below). Certainly, all these facts separately- loss of technology, climate shift, destroyed forests and a large number of craters (presumably from nuclear explosions) - cannot explain what exactly happened at the turn of 1812-1815. But taken together, they fit into our understanding of nuclear war, about small nuclear winter and its consequences. For most people, these facts in themselves do not say anything, and even more so, they are not evidence. But for smart people, they are a very important and interesting basis for thinking. After all, if the truth is established and proven the fact of high-tech warfare at that time, then our entire subsequent history can be presented in a completely different way! For example, many, if not all, wars and revolutions may turn out to be stages in the constant struggle of our ancestors for independence: both what is presented to us as peasant uprisings in the 19th century, and the revolutions of 1905 and 1917, and the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945 . For example, it is well known and allegedly documented that in Leningrad before the war, the power of electricity consumed was 1400 MW, and during the war years (taking into account electricity from the Volkhovskaya HPP) - only 58 MW. And we are also officially told and even written that with such a catastrophic shortage of energy, the entire industry worked, and even trams ran! Moreover, we are told that encircled Leningrad a huge amount of freshly made weapons and ammunition was regularly sent to the front! But after all, in order to manufacture these weapons and ammunition, it was necessary to import even larger quantities of raw materials into surrounded city! Supply it not only with energy, but also with heat, and fuel and lubricants, and food, and water, and medicines, and clothing, and other essentials! And all this had to be delivered in tens or hundreds of thousands of tons every month! How could this be done if, as military historians say, the city was completely surrounded within three years?! No way! If the city really was surrounded by enemies, then none of this would be possible! So somewhere around here a lot was wrong. Not at all! And there are a lot of such questions, even with a minimally detailed consideration of our history, in all directions. It is no longer necessary to rely on historians who have lied to us for many decades. Therefore, we will have to conduct honest, conscientious research and establish the truth ourselves! To highlight the results of our research, we filmed several small videos.
It is quite possible that we made mistakes and reservations in the videos, for which we (I and the team of authors) ask you to excuse us, but they certainly do not change the essence of the story. Soon there will be a film on the capture and distortion of religions, and a film directly summarizing nuclear funnels. 02.08.2012 If you carefully look around, you can see a lot of amazing things. In St. Petersburg, you can see buildings that we are not able to build even today. We don't have the necessary technology today. And 300 years ago there were... The city of St. Petersburg is only 308 years old, but it has a rich history. When you get acquainted with the buildings of the city, almost every house has its own unique life and origin. Each house can tell a lot about its owners, about the methods of construction and the technologies used in its construction. When you get acquainted with the history of the founding and construction of the city, you cannot help but feel admiration for the builders and architects. After all, according to official history, all houses were built in swamps, all work was done by hand, there were no mechanisms to facilitate the work of serfs and workers. The bulk of the people working in construction were allegedly illiterate and uncultured. AND only thanks to Peter I and the “masters” invited by him from “enlightened” Europe, they were able to overcome lack of culture and illiteracy in Russia and build a new capital. That the official historical science is lying, you are convinced immediately upon closer acquaintance with the buildings and structures in the historical center of the city. The first thing that surprised me was the front door of the right wing of the General Staff Building (address: Nevsky Prospekt, 2). It seems to be an inconspicuous door, only the lining of this door is made of granite, and in this lining there is a granite patch, so skillfully placed that there is not the slightest gap, it is impossible to stick even a razor blade through. I immediately had a thought: how was it done by hand and is it possible to do the same today? It turned out that it is theoretically possible, but this pleasure is very time-consuming and not cheap! But this is just a door lining, and making it by hand would most likely take at least a month. Think for yourself: bring granite, first hew it into a flat board, then gouge the grooves along the pattern, then eliminate the defects, install a patch in place of the defect and grind it later. And everything would be fine, but in this lining it is installed around the perimeter four patches. This can be seen in photo 1 and photo 2. The construction of the building of the "General Staff", with this approach, would drag on for centuries. And according to the available information, the huge building of the "General Staff" was built only 9 years: from 1819 to 1828. Therefore, we can make an unambiguous conclusion that this door lining was not carried out manually and was made with the help of an unknown to us now, machine technology. On this, as it turned out, the wonders of St. Petersburg do not end, but only begin. Many people know that there is St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg. If you go around this cathedral in a circle, then from the side of Voznesensky Prospekt we will see columns damaged by German artillery shells during the Great Patriotic War. These columns were not repaired, although restoration was carried out in St. Isaac's Cathedral in 1950-60, and the presence of traces from shells in the columns indicates that we now do not have the technology to repair monolithic granite products. Our repair capabilities are limited to puttying and painting plastered walls. However, this Cathedral is also notable for the fact that at the base of some columns there are patches of granite. There are four such patches from Voznesensky Prospekt. If you have seen how asphalt patches are installed, then you can imagine the process of installing such a patch in a column blank. Why do I write "in the blank"? Because it is possible to install such a patch only at the stage of manufacturing the column in order to replace the defects identified during the processing of a single piece of granite - the future column. This operation cannot be done manually. And judging by the mass of the column, according to various sources from 114 to 117 tons, the purity of processing and polishing of the column, then we can draw a quite obvious conclusion about the use machine technology. In a different way, i.e. manually, So the column cannot be processed. In any case, we are not yet aware of such methods and technologies. The tool must be carbide and have a high speed of work relative to the product, so there is no need to talk about a steam or water drive for such a machine. A few words about the construction itself: official information available to everyone reports the following: the construction of the cathedral began in 1818. In official sources, there is no mention of the use of machine tools and lifting machines in the construction of St. Isaac's Cathedral. The weight of the columns of the upper colonnade is 64 tons, and the height of the colonnade is 41 meters. For comparison, I will say that this is the height of the 14th floor. Machines and mechanisms capable of lifting such a weight to such a height does not exist now. If one can still somehow agree with the version of the manual installation of the lower colonnade from columns weighing 114-117 tons (purely theoretically), then all attempts to explain the manual (machineless) assembly of the upper colonnade do not stand up to criticism. Inside St. Isaac's Cathedral, surprise is only is growing. Imagine that someone removed a large piece of pink marble, then sawed it into several pieces, made a column from one piece, cut panels from the others 10-15 cm thick and more than 6 meters long. But that's not all: the column was first turned around, then grooves were cut in it and bulges were left inside the grooves from the bottom of the column, and then the column was sawn lengthwise into two halves and these halves were installed as decorations along the walls. The same grooves with bulges were cut in the panels. Technologies and machines with which it would be possible to do this, we still don't have. To refer to the fact that it was built by aliens or representatives of a long-dead civilization (as in the case of the Egyptian pyramids) is not necessary, because. St. Isaac's Cathedral was built, according to the official version of history, less than 150 years ago, and we allegedly know almost everything about this time. And so it turns out that the very existence of this building contradicts the official version of history. Various columns are widely used in public buildings in St. Petersburg, especially in houses built in the 18th and first half of the 19th centuries. This is the headquarters building An example of such construction is the Kazan Cathedral. It has 96 external columns and more than 50 internal ones, i.e. columns are a very important part of the whole building. The outer columns are made of marble, the inner columns are made of granite, the weight of the columns is not mentioned, the columns are solid, this can be seen from the photograph. This temple was built for 11 years, from 1800 to 1811. The very possibility of such construction was determined by two important factors: the cost and time of manufacturing one column and other structural elements. Produce 150 identical columns in 11 years (excluding construction) without the use of machines and machine tools it is impossible. Separately, it is necessary to consider the Alexandrian column. This majestic monument was built in 5 years from 1829 to 1834. The basis of the monument is the core of the column, 23 meters long, with a diameter of 3.5 meters at the base and 3.15 meters at the top (that is, a cone). The mass of this cone is 600 tons. Examining the quality of the column, its shape and weight, we can definitely conclude that it is impossible to manufacture it without mechanisms and machines. This column we can't build even now, because we don't have that kind of technology yet. Moreover, we do not have the technology to extract such a monolith from a quarry, and most importantly, we cannot just transport to the place of manufacture, and then to the place of installation! The most obvious example is the Hermitage building. Its construction has begun in 1754. According to the official version of history, during this period of time in Russia, the population was still totally illiterate, industry was very poorly developed. There were allegedly only a few Demidov factories beyond the Urals, a little in the Tula province, in some places there were stone-cutting workshops where various "Danilo-masters" worked., the building was built in 8 years. All this is made not by hand. All these elements were manufactured at different factories, brought to the site and assembled. It is impossible to build such a building in such a short time and with such amazing quality without the use of construction equipment and powerful lifting mechanisms! In order for all the elements to be quickly assembled, they had to fit together without any refinement, and this indicates the presence at that time product standardization and certification systems(similar to GOSTs in the Union), about the highest level of processing technologies (compared to today's level), about broad cooperation between enterprises throughout the state. Little of, to design and to assemble such a building, we need appropriate design documentation on tens of thousands of sheets. To develop design and technical documentation of such a volume and level, it is necessary to attract a whole design institute. And historians keep telling us that in Russia almost everyone was illiterate at that time! But after all, it was obviously not illiterate people who had to make elements of buildings and assemble them into a single whole, but with a high level of education. And neither illiterate peasants nor other illiterate specialists could do this in principle! Europe was at that time still a very peculiar place, and was not able to participate in such construction. Build differently such building like the Hermitage, no way impossible! According to current and imposed us the ideas of historical science about the state and development of society and the state of that time, this and many other buildings should not exist. But they stand, despite numerous efforts to destroy them! We can rightly be noted that most of these structures were built in the 19th century (200 years ago), and what do the uneducated first builders of St. Petersburg have to do with it? The first builders really had nothing to do with it, but the Hermitage building was built 50 years after the founding of the city (260 years ago, in the 18th century), and it was built by supposedly illiterate, uneducated peasants from the surrounding villages. And today we are most, if not all, of these buildings unable to build! But how did our supposedly uneducated ancestors build them, who allegedly lived in dugouts quite recently? There is no explanation for this! And those who ask such questions are trying to shut their mouths as soon as possible! What to do? Necessary find real information about our past and reconsider all the history that has been made up for us. Let's ask ourselves another interesting question: Are they capable of we build now such building in 8 years? The answer is clear - NO. And in 20 years? Answer: Maybe, if we will preliminarily develop the necessary technologies for processing monolithic products, build new factories, invent new transport and lifting mechanisms, develop a system of standards and everything else. And if you remember that you still need to design and manufacture all the elements of decoration and decoration, then the construction will drag on for 50 years. In addition, the cost of such a building will be much more than all the sports facilities in Sochi combined. Today we have not yet reached such a technological level in industry and construction that we had during the construction of many buildings in St. Petersburg. The Hermitage was ahead of its time by 300 (or maybe more) years... Alexey KungurovPermanent address of the article- http://ru-an.info/news_content.php?id=1220 One of the versions about what happened 200 years ago And then he walked along the Nile Delta, across the Sahara, Russia and was surprised at what he saw. 1. In the same area, several tens of kilometers to the southeast. In the same area, a few tens of kilometers to the southeast More Egypt, diameter 6 km And also Egypt, diameter 10 km The site was bombed as if there were many military installations or large cities. Now Russia: The same traces as in Egypt. An allusion to the standard charges of the same power, which were used for the bombardment. The standard dimensions of funnels are striking: 10, 6, 3 km. Which practically excludes the natural origin of these traces. Conversely, it confirms that these are traces of the use of standard ammunition of the same power. And now the trace of a very large explosion in the Sahara desert. The diameter of the funnel is 40 km. I even find it difficult to calculate the power of the ammunition that left such a mark. There are quite a lot of such traces all over the world. If you look at the footprints from Nevada, it is almost impossible to say that the footprints from Egypt, Russia, Western Sahara are several thousand years old. Forests in places where traces of the bombing are visible on the territory of Russia are solid birch. This is another confirmation that this place was a wasteland or field. It is in such places that birch forests appear. That is, after the bombing of the forest, everything burned down, and a birch forest appeared on the site of the conflagration. Who bombed us so thoroughly and with what? Here is a satellite photograph of the site of the most powerful explosion of our time - the testing of the Tsar bomb with a capacity of 50 megatons on Novaya Zemlya. Coordinates: 73°51’0.11″N 54°30’1.29″E The height of the explosion is about 4000 meters above the surface. We see a round mark with a diameter of 18 km. Let's estimate approximately the power of the explosions that left marks: 20 km in size corresponds to about 55 megatons, 10 km - 30 megatons. Here is another confirmation of the version of a nuclear bombing in Russia: A few more considerations that came after all this material. Just another thought came about the pole shift. According to historical data, grapes grew on the Kola Peninsula, and Greenland was green in its name. Isakievsky Cathedral is not oriented to the cardinal points, as is usually done during the construction of temples, but at an angle. If we assume that before it was oriented strictly to the cardinal points, then the north pole should be on the line before climate change. along which stand St. Isaac's Cathedral and the Bronze Horseman. The line passes through Greenland and continues on to the Great Lakes in Canada. Assuming that the Kola Peninsula had a subtropical climate and Greenland had a temperate climate, then the pole must have been somewhere in the Great Lakes region before the shift. And in those places we find obvious traces of the most powerful glaciers, there is still glacial water in the lakes that occupy half of Canada. The presence of freshly frozen mammoths in Siberia, which within a few hours moved from the temperate zone beyond the Arctic Circle, is also easily explained with the help of this version. And what about the south pole? If we look at the opposite point on the surface of the Earth, we will see the following picture not far from it: It looks exactly like Canada, there are many narrow fjords - traces of powerful glaciers sliding into the water - and this is at a distance of 4600 km from the current south pole, that is, at the latitude of Volgograd! Where are the glaciers from? Another indirect confirmation of our version. It also becomes clear where the map of Antarctica without ice cover came from, since Antarctica was 4000 km south of its current location. Considering that the area of ice in North America was much larger than the area of the glacier in Antarctica / Greenland, it is clear that the level of the world seas was much lower, and Antarctica and South America were one continent, which is shown on the map. since a lot of water, many times more than now lies in Antarctica, lay in the form of ice in North America Let's try to calculate the exact location of the old north pole. It is located on the line from St. Isaac's Cathedral. But where exactly on this line? There is such a thing as the polar circle. This is the place around the Pole where the Sun does not rise at least one day a year. It is quite natural that glaciers beyond the Arctic Circle should be the most massive and, accordingly, leave the most distinct traces when they slide into the ocean. The radius of this circle is 2580 km. If you look at the coastline of Canada and the United States, a strange distribution of traces from sliding glaciers is striking. If we impose a circle with the diameter of the Arctic Circle on Canada so that the brightest and deepest traces will pass inside this circle, then we get a fairly accurate location of the "old" north pole. The most interesting thing is that the boundaries of the traces of glaciers on the coastline very accurately fall on this circle. This looks especially strange at points where the coastline is perpendicular to the line of the Arctic Circle. Here, the tracks from the glacier are abruptly interrupted and this is observed at all four such points (see the map, points 1, 2, 3, 4). Another confirmation of our version is that everywhere inside the old Arctic Circle the coastline is dotted with fjords, traces of massive glaciers sliding into the ocean. Even in North Carolina, which is now at a distance of 6000 km from the north pole (point 4). And if you look at the "old" south pole, then our version is confirmed by the map of 1513, which is mentioned in the article. This map shows Queen Maud land without ice. So it was this side of Antarctica that was the northernmost, that is, the most distant from the "old" south pole. The distance from the pole to the coast of Antarctica is more than 4700 km (the latitude of the Volgograd region, where we currently do not observe glaciers). Another interesting coincidence is that the found point of the "old" north pole is located exactly in the middle between the tropic and the pole. Additional interesting information has emerged: Needless to say, Nebraska obviously has traces of powerful glaciers. Here is a quote from the handbook: “Geologically, Nebraska is divided into two regions: the Dissected Plains and the Great Plains. The eastern part of the state lies in the zone of the Dissected Plains, which formed even before the retreat of the glacier and is an area with characteristic gentle hills. It turns out that St. Isaac's Cathedral is the same age as the pyramids in Sudan and the pyramids in China. About St. Isaac's Cathedral and about St. Petersburg in general in the following posts, this is a separate and very interesting story. In short, the entire official history of the founding of Peter by Peter is a complete lie. This city was one of the centers of antediluvian civilization. The coast of the Arctic Ocean was located at a distance of 5100 km to 8000 km, i.e. there was a very mild climate, the same as now on the northern coast of France (5100 km from the pole). It was as warm in Taimyr (6800 km from the pole) as in Sharm El-Sheikh (the same 6800 km, only from the new pole). Isn't that why Egypt is so popular among Russians? Karelia, Murmansk were at a distance of 7300-7700 km from the pole, which corresponds to the latitude of the Dominican Republic, northern India, and Taiwan. Historical evidence that pineapples grew on the Kola Peninsula is confirmed, the Dominican Republic is a major producer of pineapples. Here is an excerpt from the description of this country: “Is it necessary to say that tropical pineapple also grows in the Dominican Republic?)) Surprisingly, pineapple is also a herb. And its fruits ... again, "berries")). The pineapple comes from Latin America. Here it occurs naturally in the wild. It is known that the ancient Indians not only collected wild pineapples for food, but also knew how to grow them. From pineapples, the Indians made wine and medicinal drugs, and fabrics were made from the fibers of the leaves. Petersburg was at a distance of 7900 km from the old pole - the latitude of today's Philippines and Haiti - summer all year round and no white nights. But more on that in future posts. update: We already have 4 confirmations that the previous north pole was exactly at the indicated point. Is it possible that at such distances and in completely different cultures, structures were built that are oriented to the same point (a spread of no more than 30 km at a distance of 8-11 thousand kilometers) by chance? When the pole moved from the center of America to today's place, the entire coast of the Arctic Ocean moved to the ocean. That is, traces of flooding on the coast and masses of frozen sea water on the land surface that did not have time to flow back into the ocean should be visible. And we find such traces. And exactly where it is most expected - on the northernmost islands, where the temperature drop was maximum. With the movement of the poles, this is quite possible, when the land moves towards the ocean, ocean water splashes onto the land and moving far north, freezes on the fly in a short time. But in the photograph, the chernozem on Novaya Zemlya, of course, is now useless for plants, but obviously formed in a completely different climate than the one that is on Novaya Zemlya now. St. Basil's Cathedral on Red Square (coordinates 55°45'9.26″N 37°37'23.35″E) is also oriented to the old pole, although not as accurately as other buildings, but with a shift of about 250 kilometers at a distance of 8600 km. This corresponds to a deviation of approximately 1.6 degrees. Orientation accuracy is quite high. I have always wondered why this most beautiful cathedral stands as if it was placed quite by accident, paying no attention to either the cardinal directions or the layout of the city. And now it became clear why. We see that St. Isaac's Cathedral also has a so-called "frontal place", where the Bronze Horseman is now located, which is considered a monument to Peter I. And there is no monument at St. Basil's Cathedral on the "frontal place". Although both "frontal places" stand strictly on the line "old north - old south", if you look from the center of both "frontal places" to the middle of the central dome. Another oddity near St. Isaac's Cathedral: the base of the Bronze Horseman in the form of an oval or ellipse and the monument itself stand along the axes strictly in the direction of the old north - old south, which corresponds to the orientation of St. Isaac's Cathedral. The square around the base of the Bronze Horseman is oriented differently. That is, there are two options: either the Bronze Horseman was placed crookedly, or the square around it was marked crookedly, which seems absurd when you look at the accuracy of how St. Isaac's Cathedral was built. Or this square was deliberately marked along other axes in order to emphasize that the bronze horseman has nothing to do with St. Isaac's Cathedral. Indeed, according to the official version, the Bronze Horseman was built by Catherine II on August 18) 1782. St. Isaac's Cathedral was allegedly built in 1858. Well, the Bronze Horseman himself stands exactly along the same axes as Isaac, so the attempt to hide the connection between the Bronze Horseman and St. Isaac's Cathedral failed. The question arises: why are there so many lies around these two buildings ??? Another interesting coincidence: It is quite obvious that the directions coincide. That is, the Piri Reis map of 1513 shows directions to both poles - the one in Nebraska, USA, and the one in the Arctic Ocean. Another direct indication of the old north pole has been found. The mapmaker apparently knew both about the pole shift and their exact location both before and after the shift. It remains an open question whether Piri Reis himself compiled the map that bears his name, or whether he copied the old map and already put his signature on this copy as the author. If the Map was compiled by Piri Reis himself, then the pole shift should have occurred no earlier than 1513, which seems absurd at first glance, but no more than everything that is written above in this post. update:
|
Read: |
---|
New
- Texts on history, the reign of Ivan the Terrible
- Denikin: the main strategist of the civil war What happened to Denikin after the civil war
- “Mother went to the bathhouse through the forest ...”
- "Captains", analysis of the cycle of poems by Gumilev Gumilev captains read
- Enter at sunset - presentation
- Alexander Blok and Lyubov Mendeleeva: a strange family union in which the third was not superfluous Young publisher and playwright
- "In the depths of the Siberian ores ..." A
- Dante and Beatrice: Man's Love for an Angel Dante's Beloved
- Evgeny Yevtushenko quotes
- Food in the school cafeteria is a special issue. Photo by Tamara Khamitsevich