Site sections
Editor's Choice:
- What happens if the moon disappears
- Molecular structure of ice
- The village of Shushenskoye on the river Shusha The village of Shushenskoye
- With what beat of the chimes does the New Year come?
- Dwarf Stars Dwarf Star Ore
- Is there a place on Earth that does not belong to any state?
- Simon Bolivar: "National Liberator Interesting about the beginning of the bolivar
- Visible horizon and its range
- Death of Peter I. History and causes. Open questions of history: why did Peter I die? What hurt Peter 1
- Summer and winter time: who and why came up with changing the clock
Advertising
Emelyan Pugachev - short biography. The Peasant War by Emelyan Pugacheva The end of the Pugachevshchina year |
The uprising of Yemelyan Pugachev is a popular uprising during the reign of Catherine II. The largest in the history of Russia. Known under the names Peasant War, Pugachevshina, Pugachev rebellion. It took place in 1773 - 1775. It happened in the steppes of the Trans-Volga region, the Urals, the Kama region, Bashkiria. Accompanied by great sacrifices among the population of those places, atrocities on the part of the mob, devastation. Suppressed by government troops with great difficulty. Causes of the Pugachev uprising
Beginning of the Pugachev region
The uprising led by Pugachev. Briefly
“He was about forty, medium height, thin and broad-shouldered. There was gray in his black beard; living large eyes and ran. His face had an expression rather pleasant, but roguish. Her hair was cut in a circle" ("The Captain's Daughter")
In total, according to rough estimates of historians, in the ranks of the Pugachev army by the end of 1773 there were from 25 to 40 thousand people, more than half of this number were Bashkir detachments
The general squabble between Golitsyn and Shcherbatov allowed Pugachev to recover from defeat and start the offensive again.
“We grant this nominal decree with our royal and paternal mercy to all who were previously in the peasantry and in the citizenship of the landowners, to be loyal slaves to our own crown; and we reward with an ancient cross and prayer, heads and beards, liberty and freedom and forever Cossacks, without requiring recruitment kits, capitation and other cash taxes, ownership of lands, forest, hay land and fishing, and salt lakes without purchase and without dues; and we free everyone from the nobles and Gradtsk bribe-takers-judges who were previously inflicted from villains by the peasants and all the people of the taxes and burdens imposed. Given on July 31st, 1774. By the grace of God, we, Peter the Third, Emperor and Autocrat of All Russia and the like"
The centers of the uprising were extinguished only in the summer of 1775. Reasons for the defeat of the peasant uprising Pugachev
The results of the Pugachev rebellion
Emelyan Ivanovich Pugachev (1740 or 1742-1775) was born in the Zimoveyskaya village on the Don (it was also the birthplace of S. T. Razin), in a family of poor Cossacks. With 17 years of military service. Member of the Seven Years and Russian-Turkish wars. For the courage shown in battles, he received the junior officer rank of cornet. In military campaigns, Pugachev fell ill and tried to retire due to illness, but they did not let him go. Avoiding military service, from the end of 1771, Pugachev was hiding in the Kuban, Terek, Lower Volga and the Southern Urals, where at that time there were popular unrest. In February 1772 he was arrested, but he soon fled, hiding among the Old Believers. On a denunciation, he was again arrested. In January 1773 he was taken to Kazan and sentenced to hard labor in Siberia. But in May 1773 he fled again. The famous portrait of Pugachev was painted over the image of Catherine II. The instigators of the uprising were the Cossacks. And this is no coincidence. The position of the Cossacks changed in the 60-70s. XVIII century. Some ancient rights and liberties were taken away from the Cossacks, more and more often the government intervened in the Cossack self-government. At the beginning of 1772, a riot broke out among the Yaik Cossacks. Despite the fact that the speech was suppressed, the Cossacks did not reconcile. They were ready to continue the uprising, but there was no leader. It was at this moment that Emelyan Pugachev appeared in the circle of the Yaik Cossacks, who declared himself Emperor Peter III, forcibly deprived of the throne by the "evil wife Catherine". In September 1773, Pugachev's manifesto was read to the Cossacks on Tolkachev's farm. According to this document, “Emperor Peter III” granted the Cossacks land along the Yaik River, grain salaries and money. Around Pugachev, a detachment of 80 people gathered, which moved to Orenburg, the largest fortress in southeastern Russia. On the way, the rebels captured small towns, the military garrisons of which went over to the side of the Pugachevites. The number of rebels increased every day: so attractive was what Yemelyan Pugachev promised in his manifestos. The detachment was joined by serfs and state peasants assigned to factories, artisans, as well as Bashkirs, Maris, Tatars, Udmurts and other peoples of the Volga region. As a result, a whole army of 2.5 thousand people, who had 20 guns, approached Orenburg. In early October 1773, Pugachev surrounded Orenburg. The siege lasted six months, but the rebels failed to take the fortress. At the same time, the popular movement grew. Pugachev's associate Salavat Yulaev raised the Bashkirs to revolt. The Kalmyk army took the side of the rebels. As a result, Samara, Chelyabinsk, Kurgan, Krasnoufimsk were captured, Yekaterinburg, Ufa, Kungur were blocked. Separate detachments of the rebels continued to resist. In November 1774, Salavat Yulaev was defeated and captured, until May 1775 Pugachev's colonel Pyotr Roshchin fought in the Mordovian forests. Only cruel repressions and a terrible famine that gripped the southeast of the Russian Empire pacified the rebels. Pugachev was sent to Moscow in a wooden cage. On January 10, 1775, he and his closest supporters were executed on Bolotnaya Square. The authorities brutally dealt with ordinary participants in the rebellion: they were hanged, and rafts with gallows were launched along the Volga and other rivers. This, according to the government, was supposed to frighten the people and prevent new demonstrations. Catherine II generously rewarded the punishers of the Pugachev uprising: she granted Mikhelson 600 peasants, majors of punitive detachments - 300 each, captains - 200 each, lieutenants - 150 each, second lieutenants - 100 each, warrant officers - 80 each. Invariably called the golden age. The empress reigned on the throne, similar in her main aspirations to the great reformer Peter, just like him, who wants to make Russia a part of civilized Europe. The empire grows stronger, new lands are annexed by means of a powerful military force, sciences and arts develop under the supervision of an educated queen. But there was also the "horror of the 18th century" - this is how Catherine the Great called the Pugachev uprising. Its results, as well as the causes and the course, revealed sharp contradictions hidden behind the luxurious facade of the golden age. Causes of the uprisingThe first decrees of Catherine after the removal of Peter III were manifestos on the release of the nobles from compulsory military and public service. The landlords got the opportunity to engage in their own economy, and in relation to the peasants they became slave owners. The serfs received only unbearable duties, and even the right to complain about the owners was taken away from them. In the hands of the owner was the fate and life of the serf. The share of those peasants who were assigned to factories turned out to be no better. Assigned workers were mercilessly exploited by miners. In terrible conditions, they worked in heavy and dangerous industries, and they had neither the strength nor the time to work on their own allotments. No wonder it was in the Urals and in the Volga region that the Pugachev uprising flared up. The results of the repressive policy of the Russian Empire in relation to the national outskirts - the appearance in the rebel army of hundreds of thousands of Bashkirs, Tatars, Udmurts, Kazakhs, Kalmyks, Chuvashs. The state drove them from their ancestral lands, building new factories there, planted a new faith for them, forbidding the old gods. On the Yaik RiverThe fuse, from which the huge space in the Urals and the Volga was engulfed in the flames of popular anger, was the performance of the Yaik Cossacks. They protested against the deprivation of their economic (the state monopoly on salt) and political (the concentration of power in the elders and atamans supported by the authorities) freedoms and privileges. Their performances in 1771 were brutally suppressed, which forced the Cossacks to look for other methods of struggle and new leaders. Some historians express the version that the Pugachev uprising, its causes, course, results were largely determined by the top of the Yaik Cossacks. They managed to subjugate the charismatic Pugachev to their influence and make him their blind instrument in achieving Cossack liberties. And when danger came, they betrayed him and tried to save their lives in exchange for his head. Peasant "anpirator"The tension in the socio-political atmosphere of that time was supported by rumors about the forcibly overthrown royal wife of Catherine, Pyotr Fedorovich. It was said that Peter III prepared a decree "On the freedom of the peasants", but did not have time to proclaim it and was captured by the nobles - opponents of the emancipation of the peasants. He miraculously escaped and will soon appear before the people and raise them to fight for the return of the royal throne. The belief of the common people in the right king, who has special marks on his body, was often used in Russia by various impostors to fight for power. Pyotr Fyodorovich, miraculously saved, really showed up. He showed obvious signs on his chest (which were traces of transferred scrofula) and called the nobles the main enemies of the working people. He was strong and brave, had a clear mind and an iron will. His birth name was Don Cossack from the village of ZimoveyskayaHe was born in 1740 or 1742 in the same places where another legendary rebel, Stepan Razin, was born a hundred years before him. Pugachev's uprising, the results of his campaigns along the Volga and the Urals, so frightened the authorities that they tried to destroy the very memory of the "peasant king." There is very little reliable information about his life. Emelyan Ivanovich Pugachev from his youth was distinguished by a lively mind and restless disposition. He participated in the war with Prussia and Turkey, received the title of cornet. Due to illness, he returned to the Don, was unable to obtain an official resignation from military service and began to hide from the authorities. He visited Poland, the Kuban and the Caucasus. For some time he lived with the Old Believers on the banks of one of the tributaries of the Volga - There was an opinion that it was one of the prominent schismatics - Father Filaret - who gave Pugachev the idea to say that he was miraculously saved by the true emperor. Thus, among the freedom-loving Yaik Cossacks, the "anpirator" Pyotr Fedorovich appeared. Revolt or peasant war?The events that began as a struggle for the return of Cossack freedoms acquired all the features of a large-scale war against the oppressors of the peasantry and working people. Proclaimed on behalf of Peter III, the manifestos and decrees contained ideas that had a tremendous attraction for the majority of the population of the empire: the liberation of the peasantry from serfdom and unbearable taxes, the granting of land, the elimination of the privileges of the nobility and bureaucracy, elements of self-government of national outskirts, etc. Such slogans on the banner of the army of the rebels ensured its rapid quantitative growth and had a decisive influence on the entire Pugachev uprising. The causes and results of the peasant war of 1773-75 were a direct product of these social problems. The Yaik Cossacks, who became the core of the main military force of the uprising, were joined by workers and ascribed peasants of the Ural factories, landlord serfs. The cavalry of the rebel army was mainly Bashkirs, Kazakhs, Kalmyks and other inhabitants of the steppes on the edge of the empire. To control their motley army, the leaders of the Pugachev army formed a military collegium - the administrative and political center of the uprising. For the successful functioning of this insurgent headquarters, the will and knowledge of the Pugachev commanders were not enough, although the actions of the rebellious army sometimes aroused surprise among the regular officers and generals who opposed them with their organization and common mind, although this was a rare occurrence. Gradually, the confrontation acquired the features of a real civil war. But the beginnings of an ideological program, which could be seen in the "royal decrees" of Yemelyan, could not resist the predatory nature of his troops. The results of the Pugachev uprising subsequently showed that robberies and unprecedented cruelty in the reprisals against the oppressors turned the rebellion against the state system of oppression into that same - senseless and merciless - Russian revolt. The course of the uprisingThe fire of the uprising engulfed a gigantic space from the Volga to the Urals. At first, the performance of the Yaik Cossacks, led by a self-proclaimed spouse, did not cause concern to Catherine. Only when Pugachev's army began to replenish rapidly, when it became known that the "anpirator" was met with bread and salt in small villages and large settlements, when many fortresses in the Orenburg steppes were captured - more often without a fight - did the authorities really care. Pushkin, who studied the results and significance of the uprising, explained the rapid intensification of Cossack indignation precisely by the inexcusable negligence of the authorities. Pugachev led to the capital of the Urals - Orenburg - a powerful and dangerous army, which defeated several regular military formations. But the Pugachev freemen could not really resist the punitive forces sent from the capital, and the first stage of the uprising ended with the victory of the tsarist troops at the Tatishchev fortress in March 1774. It seemed that the Pugachev uprising, the results of which consisted in the flight of an impostor with a small detachment to the Urals, was suppressed. But that was only the first stage. Kazan landownerAlready three months after the defeat near Orenburg, a 20,000-strong rebel army came to Kazan: the losses were made up for by an instant influx of new forces from among those dissatisfied with their position. Hearing about the approach of "Emperor Peter III", many peasants themselves dealt with the owners, met Pugachev with bread and salt and joined his army. Kazan almost submitted to the rebels. They could not take by storm only the Kremlin, where a small garrison remained. Wishing to support the Volga nobility and the landowners of the region engulfed in rebellion, the empress declared herself a “Kazan landowner” and sent a powerful military group to Kazan under the command of Colonel I.I. Mikhelson, who was ordered to finally suppress the Pugachev uprising. The results of the Kazan battle were again unfavorable for the impostor, and he with the remnants of the army went to the right bank of the Volga. The end of the Pugachev uprisingIn the Volga region, which was a zone of continuous serfdom, the fire of the uprising received new fuel - the peasants, freed from captivity by the manifesto of "Peter Fedorovich", poured into his army. Soon, in Moscow itself, they began to prepare to repel a huge rebel army. But the results of Pugachev's uprising in the Urals showed him that the peasant army could not resist the trained and well-armed regular units. It was decided to move south and raise the Don Cossacks to fight, on their way there was a powerful fortress - Tsaritsyn. It was on the outskirts of it that Michelson inflicted a final defeat on the rebels. Pugachev tried to hide, but was betrayed by the Cossack foremen, captured and handed over to the authorities. In Moscow, a trial took place over Pugachev and his closest associates, in January 1775 he was executed, but spontaneous peasant uprisings continued for a long time. Prerequisites, causes, participants, course and results of the Pugachev uprisingThe table below briefly characterizes this historical event. It shows who and for what purpose participated in the uprising, and why it was defeated. Mark on historyAfter the defeat of the Pugachev region, Catherine the Great tried to do everything to make the memory of the uprising disappear forever. It was renamed Yaik, the Yaik Cossacks began to be called Ural Cossacks, the Don village of Zimoveyskaya - the birthplace of Razin and Pugachev - became Potemkinskaya. But the Pugachev turmoil was too great a shock for the empire to disappear into history without a trace. Almost every new generation evaluates the results of the uprising of Yemelyan Pugachev in its own way, calling its leader either a hero or a bandit. It just so happened in Russia - to achieve a good goal by unrighteous methods, and hang labels while being at a safe temporary distance. Pugachev's court. Painting by Perov V., 1879, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg When and where did it happen 1773-1775 Volga region, Ural, Yaik Causes The deterioration of the position of the Cossacks The introduction of a state monopoly on fishing and salt extraction, the state's attack on the Cossack liberties Difficult working conditions at the Ural factories (operation, 12-15 hour working day) Strengthening the arbitrariness of the landlords over the serfs (bullying, exile to Siberia for a fault under the decree of 1765, the right of the landowners to sell their serfs into recruits, the reduction of peasant allotments, etc.) The disenfranchised position of the non-Russian people of the Volga region, the Urals (Tatars, Kalmyks, Bashkirs). Goals Return former liberty, independence for fishing and salt mining Stop the lawlessness of the local administration Free the peasantry from oppression, return their will and land Improve the position of the Ural workers Increase the rights of the population of the national outskirts driving forces Cossacks Peasants Serf Workers Soldiers of the garrisons of the Yaitskaya line Peoples of the Volga region Stages of the uprising At this stage, a large number of Cossacks, peasants, working people joined Pugachev, hoping to get freedom, land, the number of rebels increased. Pugachev took one fortress after another. The siege of Orenburg was lifted, the rebels moved east. The army was replenished with working people from the Ural factories who brought guns, and non-Russian peoples (number reached 20 thousand). This is the most massive stage of the uprising. The army was replenished with peasants, whom in the "manifesto" Pugachev promised freedom and land, freed from dependence and taxes. The course of the uprising:
Reasons for the defeat The spontaneous, unorganized nature of the uprising Lack of a clear program of action, organization, weapons, military training The rebels dreamed of a "good king" who would free them from oppression, give land and freedom. They did not advocate the overthrow of the foundations of autocracy. Results The cruel reprisal against Pugachev and the mass executions of the rebels. The uprising or, as it is called, the war led by Yemelyan Pugachev significantly destabilized the country, became a real natural disaster. Catherine II forbade even reminding of Pugachev, tried to erase everything connected with him in the memory of the people: the Yaitsk River was renamed the Ural, the Zimoveyskaya village where Pugachev lived was named Potemkinskaya. Even the Yaik Cossacks themselves began to be called Ural. In 1775, the Zaporozhian Sich was liquidated - the remnant of the liberty of the Cossacks. The uprising did not improve the situation of the peasants The repressive nature of domestic policy in the country in relation to the entire taxable population has intensified. The situation of working people at the Ural factories did not improve (only in a number of cases wages increased slightly and working conditions changed, but these were exceptions). Significance of the rebellion The Pugachev uprising is the largest uprising of the people in the history of Russia. For the first time there was a struggle against serfdom for the abolition of serfdom The first major joint performance of the Cossacks, peasants, working people, national minorities The uprising forced Catherine II and the government to pay serious attention to the peasant question, to understand how terrible the rebellion was in Russia, what consequences it could lead to. Any uprising is a sign of an unstable situation in the country. The Pugachev uprising showed the need for reform in the country. Why can Pugachev's uprising be called a peasant war? The uprising led by Yemelyan Pugachev is often called peasant war, thereby emphasizing the scale of the uprising, the large number of participants and their heterogeneous composition, the presence of weapons, the promotion of slogans of national importance (the abolition of serfdom, for example), specific goals, objectives, the presence of certain documents (Pugachev's manifesto, his letters). In addition, a certain organization of the troops was created: regiments were created, headed by "officers" appointed by Pugachev, there was a Military Collegium, which concentrated military, administrative and judicial power, a "great state seal" was placed, and Pugachev's guards were his guards. A historical portrait of Emelyan Pugachev can be found on my websitehistorical-portrait.en Material prepared: Melnikova Vera Aleksandrovna "Pugachev in Kazan is doing court", postcard 1931, edition of the Museum of the Revolution of the USSR Pugachev under escort. 18th century engraving
"Execution of Pugachev". Engraving from a painting by A. I. Charlemagne. Mid 19th century 1.2 Causes of the peasant warThe discontent of the people is the main reason for the uprising. And each part of the social group that participated in the peasant war had its own grounds for discontent. 1. The peasants were outraged by their lack of rights. They could be sold, played at cards, given away without their consent to work at a factory, etc. The situation was aggravated by the fact that in 1767 Catherine II issued a decree forbidding peasants to complain to the court or the empress about the landowners. 2. The annexed nationalities (Chuvash, Bashkirs, Udmurts, Tatars, Kalmyks, Kazakhs) were dissatisfied with the oppression of their faith, the seizure of their lands and the construction of military installations on their territories. 3. The Cossacks did not like that their freedom was being infringed upon. Their rights were increasingly limited: for example, they could no longer choose and remove the chieftain as before. Now the Military Collegium did it for them. The state also established a monopoly on salt, which undermined the economy of the Cossacks. The fact is that the Cossacks mainly lived by selling fish and caviar, and salt played an important role in increasing their shelf life. The Cossacks were not allowed to extract salt themselves, the Cossacks were also not happy with this. Finally, the Cossack army abandoned the pursuit of the Kalmyks, which was ordered to them by the top. The government sent a detachment to pacify the Cossacks. The Cossacks responded to this only with a new uprising, which was brutally suppressed. People were horrified by the punishments of the main instigators and were tense. The reasons for the uprising can also include all kinds of rumors that circulated among the people. It was rumored that Emperor Peter III survived, that it was planned to soon release the serfs and grant them lands. These words, unconfirmed by anything, kept the peasants in tension, which was ready to turn into an uprising. Also speaking about the reasons for the Pugachev uprising, one cannot but say about the leader himself. After all, in those days there were many impostors, and only he was able to gather thousands of people around him. All this thanks to his mind and personality. War between Russia and France Napoleon in 1802 declared himself consul for life, and in 1804 emperor of the French; at the same time, he continued unceasingly to seize new territories in Italy and Germany, clearly striving for hegemony in the whole of Europe. When in 1805... Heilbronn program Peasant war led by E. Pugachev The policy of "enlightened absolutism" was not able to eliminate the contradictions that were tearing apart society at that time. Acting in the "spirit of the times", creating new forms of influence on society, it left almost everything unchanged at the bottom of society ... Peasant war led by S.T. Razin The movement of peasants, serfs, Cossacks and urban lower classes of the 17th century. in pre-revolutionary Russian historiography, these events were called "rebellion", in Soviet - "peasant war" ... Peasant reform of 1861 in Russia The peasant question in the 19th century became a central topic of discussion in all sectors of society. Many understood the need to free the peasants from the almost unlimited power of the landowner, because, due to the existence of this system ... Peasant reform of 1861 The reaction of the country's population to the manifesto on the abolition of serfdom, published on February 19, was quite natural. The peasants expected a more radical reform. Peasant unrest swept across the country ... Peasant Wars Various sections of the then population of Russia took part in the peasant war under the leadership of Pugachev: serfs, Cossacks, various non-Russian nationalities. The course of the uprising The uprising began on September 17, 1773... Peasant Wars After this defeat, Pugachev was forced to lift the siege of Orenburg and, pursued by government troops, move east ... Patriotic war of 1812 and its significance for Russia The war of 1812, one of the most famous not only in Russian but also in world history, was generated by a number of reasons: Alexander 1's personal resentment against Napoleon; the negative mood of the court circles, who feared, in particular ... Polybius: political portrait of Philip V In 220, Philip arrived in Corinth, where a council was held, at which the allies of Macedon expressed all their grievances against the Aetolians. The Boeotians complained that the Aetolians in peacetime desecrated the temple of Athena Itonia... Causes and consequences of the Great Patriotic War Causes of World War II. See V.V. Pokhlebkin. The Great War and the Failed Peace 1941 - 1945 - 1994. - S. 14 - 15 ... Causes, beginning, stages of the civil war in Soviet Russia What led Russia to the war, what are its origins, causes? There are no unequivocal answers to this question, just as there is no consensus on the beginning and end of the war, and hence its periodization. Before moving on to the causes of the war in Russia... North War By the end of the 17th - beginning of the 18th century, the Swedish Empire was the dominant power on the Baltic Sea and one of the leading European powers. The territory of the country included a significant part of the Baltic coast: the entire coast of the Gulf of Finland ... Trojan War The Trojan War is one of the central events in Greek mythology. Ancient sources explain the emergence of the Trojan War by the will of Zeus, who wished to either "reduce the burden of the earth" (Eur. Hel. 36-41; Procl. Chrest. 1)... The era of Peter the Great and the significance of his reforms. Reforms of Alexander II. Russian Civil War Civil wars have been known in history since ancient times. At the household level, a civil war is a war between citizens of one state. A civil war is caused by deep social, political, economic, etc... |
Read: |
---|
New
- Psychosomatics: Louise Hay explains how to get rid of the disease once and for all
- Psychosomatics: Louise Hay explains how to get rid of the disease once and for all
- Associative reading of the hexagram
- Personal characteristics of students with different creative orientation
- Educational portal Study X5 "Carousels
- Educational portal "Pyaterochka" Study X5
- Study X5 learning portal for Crossroads
- Sensitivity, its dynamics and measurement methods
- How to help a child master the concept of "offer"?
- Adolescence, Tolstoy Lev Nikolaevich