“Exposure of false scientists and academicians!”, “Forbidden knowledge about the world around us!”, “Science guards the interests of the authorities!”, “Scientific conspiracy scheme”, “Sinister methods of the scientific community”, “Secret knowledge cannot be hidden!”

I'm sure everyone has already come across such flashy headlines and readers of what is written under them. If you try to visualize the ideas of a certain part of citizens about scientists and their activities, they will look something like this:

The time has come for me to do my part, and I also decided to tear a little of the covers from the shining body of truth.

A certain part of the citizens have a strong belief in the existence of a gloomy conspiracy of silence, concealment and falsification of true knowledge. Adherents of the version of the "conspiracy of scientists" believe that instead of true knowledge, scientific knowledge is brazenly concocted, which are actually just scientific and splurge, and they are created for convenient cheating of the redneck masses. I will list the most basic and frequent accusations against science, which, as it were, confirm the existence of a conspiracy:

No. 1. There is an agreement between scientists to hide some knowledge that is extremely inconvenient for official science. Scientists are taking such steps, because science is extremely conservative, inert, businessmen from science earn money on this topic, and too much will have to be revised and canceled, which is uncomfortable and unpleasant.

No. 2. Somewhere in deeply classified storerooms, special stores, secret libraries and gloomy basements, manuscripts, tablets or objects that overturn the entire edifice of modern science are sadly languishing, but they are not shown for reason #1

No. 3. Science is highly inaccurate, often wrong, and largely untrustworthy for reasons #1 and #2. Therefore, it can be trusted only in individual cases, or it is better not to trust it at all. It automatically follows from this that any craziest hypothesis or version has equal rights with scientific theories. Moreover, the fact that people do not have education in the field in which they develop their ideas does not matter.

I answer point by point

No. 1. Scientists conspiracy. And also: hushing up secrets, hiding artifacts, destroying inconvenient inventions, serving the authorities. (First, let's define. A scientist is a representative of science who carries out meaningful activities to form a scientific picture of the world, whose activities and qualifications have been recognized by the scientific community, a person who studies objective reality empirically and operates only with facts that can be reliably confirmed or refuted, a specialist in any scientific field and made a real contribution to it).

A little about my experience of communicating with scientists. My place of work is a caretaker at the largest archaeological complex, and every year I have to communicate with scientists from different fields, someone comes for work, someone just to relax. I can say that it is difficult to find people who are more dissimilar to each other. I can't resist telling you a funny story. It happened three years ago, as usual, a group of tourists arrived and began to roam the rocks, when suddenly a man separated from the group. Coming straight up to me with resolute steps, he immediately gave his name and surname and asked menacingly - what did I read from him? I, in some confusion from such pressure, answered, - nothing, and asked, - why should I suddenly read it? To which he replied - that he is a very prominent scientist and I must know him. Immediately, he literally handed me a look at a thick book, which he carried everywhere with him, on which it was indicated that he was its author and that he had a lot of all sorts of solid scientific titles. The following year, I got into a conversation with his colleague, who came to us and worked with him for a while. She said that he was really a great specialist in his field, but he had an extremely inflated sense of his own importance. She even recalled a funny episode, how he, having thrown a scandal, demanded from the board that publishes a textbook for students in his specialty that he, along with the great classical scientists, be mentioned on the first pages as the founder of this science.

There were other unusual individuals, for example, in different years I came across people with candidate and other titles several times, after talking with whom it was clear that they peacefully coexist in faith in mystical phenomena and at the same time critically rational thinking.

The vast majority among scientists, of course, are ordinary, normal personalities, and they have as many oddities and peculiarities as all other people. The only significant difference from the majority is the desire to learn, professionally realized in constant scientific activity. Based on my observations, I can say for sure that most scientists are interested in the process of cognition itself, and not in the benefits that their status provides. Every scientist, no less than an alternative person, painfully wants to know the secrets and mysteries of the universe, it is this desire that leads most of the people to science. That is, their activity is mainly in the name of an idea, and there are simply no tools and incentives to force scientists to unite in the name of serving something. To unite them all without exception with a conspiracy or any other idea (except for the idea of ​​scientific knowledge of the world) is absolutely impossible purely technically. The global conspiracy of scientists is the same absurdity as, for example, a conspiracy of nursing mothers, bald taxi drivers or residents of all houses on the 3rd floor.

No. 2. conservatism of science. (And also its inertia, obscurantism, anti-innovation, narrow-mindedness, reactionary, ignorance). Cases of allegedly ignorant conservatism, innumerable, I will briefly talk about the three most famous. Non-existent meteorites, harmful bacteria, motionless continents.

In 1768, on September 13 in the region. Luce, France, a meteorite fell, with a large number of witnesses. The Royal Academy of Sciences of Paris had already received such evidence before, and they decided to finally figure it out. A commission was created, which included well-known scientists at that time: the mineralogist Fougereau, the pharmacist Cadet and the physicist Lavoisier. The testimonies of people, as well as the stones themselves, were studied in the most detailed way. After that, a report was published in the "Physical Journal" for 1777. In a detailed report, it was said that the stone could not fall from the sky - these are the inventions of eyewitnesses, it is of an earthly nature and that it really has some properties that are not common, but most likely due to the fact that lightning hit it. In 1803, after the fall of a meteorite in Normandy, again on behalf of the (renamed because of the revolution) Academy, the physicist Biot compiled an accurate description of its fall. After that, the reality of the existence of meteorites was recognized.

At the beginning of the 20th century, a large number of physicians believed that many human organs were not needed, and all bacteria were harmful. Here is what the biologist and Nobel laureate Ilya Mechnikov wrote in his “Etudes on Nature”: “Now there is nothing bold in asserting that not only the caecum with its appendage, but even all human large intestines are superfluous in our body and that their removal led to to very desirable results. Considered useless or even harmful: tonsils, appendix, thymus, pineal gland, etc. Views were widespread that the removal of these organs prevents poisoning of the body with the waste products of putrefactive bacteria. The practice of mass removal of some of these organs was widespread until the 1950s. After that, it gradually became clear that bacteria are necessary for the body to work and that each organ has its own useful function. All organs were rehabilitated, the last were the tonsils (tonsils). At the end of the 20th century, it was convincingly proven that they are one of the barriers for pathogenic microbes, in which protective proteins are produced. And the practice of mass removal of them from people was recognized as a mistake. For example, in the United States in the 1930s, the tonsils were removed from more than half of the children, i.e. tens of millions of people.

Until the 1960s, the "contract hypothesis" dominated - in it, all geological processes on the Earth were explained by processes of reducing its volume, i.e. compression. It was believed that it was compression that forms folds-mountains, cracks-faults and all other features of the landscape. In 1912, L.A. Wegener (a German meteorologist and geologist) presented his hypothesis at a meeting of the German Geological Association in Frankfurt am Main. In it, based on the data and observations he collected, he suggested that all continents slowly move in horizontal directions. This hypothesis immediately had some supporters. But the scientific community completely rejected this theory. In the 1960s, a huge mass of new data on the structure of the earth was obtained (a detailed map of the bottom of the world ocean was compiled, the speed of magma convection was measured - 1 cm per year, magnetic field reversals were discovered, the fact of the movement of continental plates was established - with the help of precise measurements, etc.) As a result, Wegener's hypothesis, with some refinements, was recognized as correct. Now it is generally recognized and is constantly supplemented with new data.

What does all this tell us? First, in recognizing incorrect (from the point of view of modern knowledge) theories, science was at that time in its own right, since then (with that level of tools, knowledge, methods and experience) these theories best explained the world around without involving unnecessary entities in the form mysticism and obscurity. Here it is necessary to explain a little: the purpose of any scientific theory is to economically explain as many facts as possible. If a theory appears that explains even more facts and even shorter and more understandable formulations, then it will inevitably replace the previous one. Such is the essence of science and such is the evolution of scientific views. Therefore, calls to recognize any (mystical, alternative, esoteric, etc.) theory without a sufficient number of facts confirming it look rather strange. It is usually argued that science will only benefit from this and become more useful. But such actions would be as absurd as trying to attach a horse and cart to the side of the spacecraft, in the hope that their joint thrust will increase the overall efficiency of the entire object.

In many respects, this is why science has made such progress over the past 200 years that it has got rid of appendages in the form of magic, mysticism, etc. and is fundamentally not engaged in research, which cannot be reliably measured and investigated.

Secondly, there is another feature of science that many do not like and is a frequent reason for its accusations. Sometimes it happens that there are a certain number of firmly established facts, but still they are not enough to create a theory on their basis. In this case, the problem is simply left for later and, as it were, moved into a distant box - until more facts accumulate and technical capabilities grow. For example, it was with the mass of the universe, it was more or less learned to calculate by the 1950s, but it turned out to be a huge discrepancy with the observed picture. In the early 2000s, large teams undertook targeted large-scale research in this direction, using all available opportunities (a network of telescopes, powerful computers, launching space probes, etc.), as a result, dark matter and dark energy were discovered, explaining gravitational anomalies (but in the end it raised even more other questions about the nature of itself) which led to a revision of the model of the universe.

No. 3. Not the precision of science. It should be noted right away that none of the adequate scientists ever claims the complete infallibility of scientific theories. Each of them has its weak points and white spots. But the fact of the matter is that in any theory of alternatives (when compared with scientific theory), there are an order of magnitude more weak points and white spots. And then, scientists always recognize the unconditional right of alternative theories to compete with scientific ones, and even more so the right to their existence. But here is an important condition - they must be soundly worked out with the involvement of scientific methods. Unfortunately, most of what alternative figures offer cannot even be called a scientific theory; rather, it is some kind of informational garbage that has grown on fried, and not on verifiable facts.

Often one can also hear the accusation that science does not evaluate, study, consider, or at least expose many alternative theories that continuously generate many figures and which then find a lively response from some part of the citizens. But this is also easily explained. One of the generally accepted rules for conducting a dialogue looks like this: “the burden of evidence should always lie with the approving side.” Imagine the following situation: a group of people was seated opposite you, giving them the task of a couple of hours to tell you all their theories. And you were given the task to refute them or confirm them. And here you are sitting, and all these two hours every ten seconds they are shouting out a new ridiculous idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe universe. Will you manage to sort them all out and adequately answer? Science is in the same position, the number and variety of non-scientific hypotheses is such that even 100 times more scientists will not be enough to expose all this. And it is not part of the function of science to directly fight illiterate theories.

After watching the revelations of this surgeon, I have no words -From watching the hair on end all over the body. There were assumptions, and now also confirmation that we were taken to the slaughter on MAY 2. Now much becomes clear where people disappear to. And those basements that militiamen find with mutilated bodies. And let them just try to say that the inhabitants of Odessa burned themselves! No forgiveness for fascists!

The story of an American transplantologist who worked on May 2 in Odessa. We need to let as many people as possible know about it.
Maximum Repost

Translation of Anna Nedosekina
I think that not all Russians will be able to understand without translation. Therefore, I made a translation from Ukrainian into Russian. Maybe I mistranslated somewhere, sorry. I haven't heard Ukrainian for a long time. But everyone will understand, I hope.

I want to tell you what happened to me in Ukraine quite recently. Perhaps my story will help others
to get out of the hell in which we have dragged ourselves. Everything started well when I arrived in 2009
study in America. I received a scholarship and my family could pay for my accommodation and other expenses.
After completing my bachelor's degree in 2013, I was going to enter one of the medical schools, but I had the will
Allah, I failed my Pre-Med exam. At this time, unrest began in Syria, the parents' business was
threatened by. And they could no longer help me financially. I only had to last a year to
re-take the exam and try to get a scholarship, and I began to try to get a job.
There were problems with getting a job, so I did not have a work visa. By the rules I had to
leave the country before the end of 2013, then my student visa ended. I needed to take
solution. In August, during my regular visit to the migration service, a man approached me and
offered to stipulate the possibility of getting a job with a good salary and further getting a job
visas. We went outside and reached the park. I was offered to go to another country as a peacekeeper
forces. These people needed doctors, including transplant surgeons. I immediately said that I could not openly
to do this and doubted that I could do it, given the fact that I have training only in the passed
Pre-Med program. I was told that this is an internal government order, and in case of cooperation, I
handle all documents. In addition, while working in another country, I will complete a 3-month preparatory
profile courses before sending. After verification, I will have the amount in the bank account and a work visa.
I will be able to start working and I will be able to pay for my studies myself. When in 2013 I made the decision to go to
Ukraine, I wanted to check it all for myself. And, of course, I was embarrassed by the circumstances. Especially since
During my studies, I had one trip to Ukraine, to Kiev. It was one student exchange trip
from Kiev universities. Since childhood, I know a little Russian, and it was not so difficult for me to communicate. Russian
I learned the language in my school years in my homeland, in Syria. My aunt was a teacher at a Russian school.
That's why. when in the 3rd year we were offered to choose countries for a trip, I chose Ukraine. I felt comfortable.
There were difficulties with understanding in the family. they looked at the transplant with suspicion, accusing me of
immorality. Therefore, no one knew about what I actually did in Ukraine. The family thought that I
went as an ordinary doctor as part of the peacekeeping forces to support peace in Ukraine. It's on the news
they said the same thing. I already understood then that organ transplantation is a proven method and standard
operations. The technique of conducting such operations is not a secret. Now there is an acute shortage of donor organs all over the world.
Therefore, transplantation has development and funding. not always legal. Therefore, there is a lot
moral and ethnic tests. This is the difficulty in our work - to agree with our conscience.
Everything else has already been decided by greedy officials and the military. In many countries, the authorities are aware of these cases. By this
For this reason, we were promised support and security guarantees in other countries. We were given documents
confirmed that we were journalists. It was an international journalist's certificate in my name.
As I was promised, before the trip we took special training courses and were ready to fly.
There must be a year of work in another country, then a return to the United States. To a new life for me.
We were placed in an apartment not far from the US Embassy. once a week we were visited by strange people
in simple clothes. We heard Ukrainian and English. We were told what we would do soon
organ harvesting operations for further treatment of seriously ill people. Which ones were not specified. We allowed
that they could be soldiers or citizens of Ukraine, that our help is needed for people's lives, for salvation
people's lives.
Every week we went to the outskirts of the city. there was a small building - a private clinic. Without a sign.
We were brought to the entrance, accompanied by guards, we quickly got into the middle of the building. Everything was there
dyed green. Like in an operating room. In this house we performed operations. in shifts. Sometimes they spent the night
there. We had rooms like in cheap hotels. Like soldiers have beds in two tiers. That was before the start
May. On May 1, they were raised early in the morning and the officer announced a two-part list. We've all been divided into two parts
and told them to pack their things. We were leaving for an emergency call. As it became known later, to Odessa. We've moved out
from Kiev in the evening and by nightfall were in Odessa. two mobile complexes were prepared in advance there
for operations in emergency situations. such situations were cataclysms or war. but on the streets
everything was calm and there were no visible reasons for such preparation of the city. our group of doctors is located
on the outskirts of the city, another group was taken to the center.
On May 2, everyone got up in the morning and was told to be ready to receive organs to prepare them for
further transportation somewhere further. our group on the outskirts had to take boxes from the first
groups from the city center and prepare boxes for long-term transportation. During this day we worked as
hard labor, at gunpoint and the cries of the military. We had first fears for our lives and
serious suspicions about the reality of what is happening. In one day my eyes saw so many organs
how many I have not seen in all the time of my training in surgery.
Where were they brought from, and why so many in one day? We couldn't watch the city news during
work, but by the evening one of the colleagues said that there was a massacre in the city. War? We didn't know the right
explanation, but understood that something abnormal was going on. Everything happened so fast, everyone was in a hurry
collect as many organs as possible in one day. Pick up and take out. Removal of a kidney from a corpse
transpathology is admissible under the following conditions: only at the end of 30 minutes after an irrefutable
installation of biological death, which occurred despite the implementation of the entire complex of resuscitation
measures, and recognition of the absolute futility of further resuscitation.
It was obvious, everyone was in a hurry to be in time, we were all in a hurry, at gunpoint. And the first team in the city center
- "purchasers" - were also in a hurry, because a "live" kidney cut from a living person is much more
valuable material than carved from the dead. The cerebral cortex dies 3-4 minutes after death
human, the kidneys remain viable for 30 minutes. The sooner they are cut and preserved,
the better they are suitable for transplantation. Ideally, while the donor's heart is still beating. That hunt that is tough
imposed by the military, and the same thing went for "live" kidneys. Prepare the operating field - lubricate with brilliant green
and iodine chest, stomach, groin. Hands lead up and tied with a bandage. Then a cruciform incision is made
belly of the donor and, further, according to the scheme, organs are removed.
After the events in Odessa, I realized that everything was not as promised. We were told that we were working
doctors in the field, but in reality it turned out that they were not doctors, but pathologists. We had to dissect corpses
dead soldiers and ordinary people.
Then, in Odessa, on May 2, we first heard about some important person for the military - Nalivaichenko.
While loading boxes with organs into the car, two soldiers dropped the cart, and the officer kicked them for a long time and
shouted that if you ruin at least one box, I myself will give your kidneys to Nalivaichenko.
On May 3, we arrived early in the morning in some city or large village. A day later, our cortege of three
cars drove on. It was after Odessa. Were - Slavyansk, Kramatorsk. Moved between cities
at night. And all the time we did the same thing: every day we worked like slaves of Frankenstein, cut and
removed organs. These were the bodies of soldiers. Right on the streets of cities and villages. blood on my hands every day. It was
hell in reality. From morning to evening, mutilated bodies and grimaces of horror on the faces of men and women.
So. we were brought not only to the battlefield to the dying soldiers. The bodies were brought to us absolutely clean and
well-groomed. With one round shot. More often in the head. I thought it was the scariest thing a doctor could see.
But a real nightmare lay ahead of us. We have become part of the conveyor for the extraction and transportation of human
organs. And I was part of this whole hell machine. When we were brought to Donetsk, the situation became even more
scarier. Now they began to force us to carry out the "plan". every day we were given a list of what we
must find on the streets of the city that is on fire. This list included children and pregnant women. Those who
refused to carry out the "plan", beaten and threatened that they would become donors themselves.
In the first group, two people disappeared in a week. Did not return from the city. So we were told. We were brought to Donetsk to the "Laboratory for Transplantation of Vital Organs". In reality, it was a terrible place.
area of ​​20 sq.m. It was all in the basement of a building. We were shown an ammonia plant and an iron
cabinet with medicines and tools. The basement had poor lighting, humidity, cold. We walked along
boards under which dirty water sloshed. We had three wooden operating tables at our disposal.
It was evident that they were made before our arrival. We operated under the illumination of ordinary lamps. Instruments
no. The diesel generator makes noise and smokes all the time. Above the basement windows of the "laboratory" constantly
heavy equipment arrived and shots and explosions were heard. We were guarded by 4 men with machine guns. In our
in the basement there was a real biological bank of living organs. We lived in this basement all summer. We worked
and slept between military visits. Then they went on missions and walked behind the military. They cleared the battlefield.
In August, we managed to escape from this hell. We returned to the city from the village, where we went for new
bodies. There were 5 people in our car. Driver, two guards and us, two surgeons. car overturned
after the assignment. There were organs in the boxes. 12 boxes. We drove up to the checkpoint. Until recently, he was "ours".
As it turned out, he was captured by other military units. We realized this when a car drove out towards us and
started flashing the lights. Our driver was the first to understand what was happening, tried to turn around right on the road.
A shootout began. our car was damaged. we stopped near the forest and wanted to run into the forest. But
the guards demanded that we take all 12 boxes with us. I felt threatened again. what kind
felt in Odessa - about special explanations that we ourselves will become donors of all organs if the goods are not
will be delivered. That Nalyvaichenko and his mercenaries will find us in an hour, and that we will be killed on the spot
while trying to escape.
We took all 12 boxes and ran towards the bushes. A real shootout and explosions began nearby
with us. Then I don’t remember exactly, because we were covered by an explosion, and when I came to my senses, it was already dark.
I didn't have boxes. I stepped out onto the road with my hands up. In my hands I had a journalist's document.
The one that, according to our employers, guaranteed us safety in a foreign country. but we
talking about peacetime. And there was a war. I had no other choice under these circumstances.
I walked into the unknown. All hope was on my legend of a journalist. I was interrogated at the checkpoint.
I said that those people captured me and kept me captive for the second month. then they sent me to Donetsk,
where they handed over to people from special services or the police. I can not say exactly. I don't know what form it was
unfamiliar and had no insignia on it. After two days of interrogation, I was placed in a cell with more
one journalist. He turned out to be a real journalist and had been in Donetsk for a month. Three days later we
handed over to an international organization. Thus began my long and difficult journey home. Now I
I am in a safe place. I hope that many of the guys who worked with me, too. But we are all
Let's remember this war, unhuman and cruel. That. which changed our lives forever. Sometimes Allah breaks
our spirit to save our souls

Google Maps is one of the most amazing technologies. Nevertheless, you will not be able to see the whole world on it: the most interesting places on public maps are blurred or painted over for some reason. Where do these secret points come from in a project that is not officially a government development? What are the powers that be trying to hide from us?

secret city

In Russia, there are still a lot of cities of the closed type. Some of them are so secret that they even disappear from the maps! The nearest settlement is Egvekinot, separated from Alaska by the Bering Strait.

Military airport

Vlissingen

Ramstein Air Force Base

Babylon

Tantauco National Park

Michael Aaf building

A very strange situation has developed in the world, when many eyewitnesses report seeing UFOs, they see how these unidentified vehicles not only surf the sky above our planet, but also land and those who control them come out of them. Of course, no one has provided 100% confirmation of the UFO landing and the presence of aliens at the moment.

There is an explanation for this paradox, and it lies in the fact that people who have direct contact with UFOs, who are present at their landing site and come into contact with their crew, completely forget that they have a cell phone, camera or video camera with them. Many remember the contact vaguely and fragmentarily, as if someone had erased their memory. Some were able to take pictures or videos to support their statements, but none of them had time to publish these testimonies. In some cases, these witnesses simply disappeared; in others, some kind of accident suddenly happened to them.

In this regard, it seems that some influential forces carefully hide the facts of visiting the Earth by representatives of other civilizations and go to the most extreme measures to maintain this concealment, up to the elimination of objectionable witnesses. Yes - we are deprived of photo and video evidence of the presence of aliens on our planet, but we have enough evidence from people who were involved in government structures and who were not afraid to declare that the governments of various countries not only directly contact aliens, but also cooperate in various matters.

For example, a few years ago, Dr. Edgar Mitchell, a former astronaut in the Apollo program and the sixth person to walk on the moon during the Apollo 14 mission, broke the plot of silence and, speaking live on the phone on Fox News, said that aliens do exist. and that the government is hiding this information from the public.

At the time of this statement, Mitchell was 82 years old and had nothing to lose. He broke his vow of silence and declared. that it is time to put an end to government secrecy in this area and that the media is deliberately discrediting the topic of UFOs.

If contacts with aliens are already a reality, then information about this is kept behind seven seals. What prevents them from being made public? In 2009, when asked by a well-known radio journalist about contacts with aliens, information about which is allegedly stored in the “Book of Secrets” in a certain Green Room that every newly elected president visits, Barack Obama answered with a joke: “I would” tell what is written in “ Book of Secrets," but then I'll have to kill you."

Jokes aside, but in 2011 the fact of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations was quite officially confirmed by the FBI, which declassified part of the archives about the UFO crash in 1947 near the American city of Roswell. Before presenting their archive to the public, the staff of the Bureau carefully blacked out all the conclusions and recommendations from there. In many documents, only the “header” remained, and the text itself was removed “for reasons of secrecy.”

In fact, the first information about the invaders of the Earth appeared in the press and on TV, when an independent group of British television journalists investigated the disappearances of many prominent scientists and talented military men in the 60s of the XX century. Everyone thought that they had gone to other countries to earn money. Journalists interviewed their friends and relatives and found strange things: postcards and letters to the motherland of the departed specialists were like two peas in a pod. And although the handwriting was different for everyone, the writing style was the same, as if they were ordered to write these texts from dictation. After a certain time, contact with these people was completely lost.

For a long time, the US authorities were accused of hiding information about aliens. Most of all "ufological" rumors went about Dwight Eisenhower. It was suspected that it was he who was the first of the powerful of this world to enter into "diplomatic relations" with the aliens. In February 1954, while vacationing in California, Eisenhower suddenly fell out of the public eye for several hours. The version about the president's connections with aliens was confirmed by William Milton Cooper (then he served as a military adviser to the US government): on April 26, 1989, he sent 536 copies of the "Petition of the Prosecution" to each member of the US Senate and House of Representatives. It reported that back in 1954, Eisenhower entered into a contractual relationship with the civilization of "gray" aliens from a planet revolving around the star Betelgeuse in the constellation Orion. Arriving on Earth on spaceships, which astronomers first mistook for asteroids, they landed at Holloman Air Force Base, and later at Edward Base, where Eisenhower's prearranged meeting with the arriving humanoids took place. In addition, Cooper claimed that the leaders of many powers and other influential people have established strong contact with aliens.

As a result of this, a kind of "secret world government" was formed, known as the Bilderberg Club, based in Geneva. It became secret from the moment information about cooperation with the "occupiers of the Earth" was classified. This club, according to him, acts as an overseer, keeping humanity in ignorance, for which orders are given to destroy and compromise scientists who are ahead of their time; inventors who made landmark inventions; archaeologists who "did not unearth something" and contactees who "got into contact with the wrong person". The "Petition of the Prosecution" contained lists of members of the secret international government, among which were Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, George W. Bush, Nelson Rockefeller, and others.

In 1991, the director of the Geneva Institute for Planetary Synthesis, R. Schneider, published the report of the same Milton Cooper "Secret Government", which stated that from 1947 to 1952, about a dozen alien ships landed on only one territory of the United States. Some crashed, others made an emergency landing. As a result, 65 corpses and ... one living alien were in the hands of the Americans. The report confirmed the existence of a secret world government that entered into an agreement with representatives of "other worlds". Under this agreement, the "initiates" received some "advanced" technology in exchange for permission to use humans for research. Why, then, to the question of whether there are aliens on Earth, representatives of the public sector answer in the negative?

Analysts offer three theories.

• 1. The purpose of silence is not to traumatize the population with the realization of the fact of the existence of other life forms in the Universe. Within this theory, it is believed that the government knows the level of technical development of aliens; correlating it with the earthly level, it came to the conclusion that in the military sense we have nothing to fear - there should be no conflict with extraterrestrial civilizations.
• 2. A kind of “world government” has historically developed on Earth, standing above all countries and peoples and controlling financial flows. And it knows about UFOs, contacts with aliens at the diplomatic level, receiving some kind of “technical assistance” from them in exchange for “modest” requests for the allocation of territories to them to create enclaves and study the life forms of the Earth.
• 3. Perhaps the members of the "world government" do not want to release the "X-files" for fear of losing control over people. They believe that the loss of power will be due to the needs of people in studying the social structure of aliens and borrowing technologies from them to restructure the state and society.

According to test pilot Marina Popovich, the first wife of cosmonaut Pavel Popovich, "UFOs are seen by all astronauts without exception, but only a few admit it."

American astronaut and test pilot Gordon Cooper, who made two flights into space (in 1963 and in 1965), claimed that back in 1951, “during flights over Germany on an F-68 fighter, he personally observed UFOs.” In 1978, Cooper wrote a letter to the UN asking for the creation of a special body that would investigate this phenomenon.

The head of the FBI from the beginning of its founding in 1935 until 1972, Edgar Hoover, regarding the famous incident of 1942 (the shooting of flying saucers over Los Angeles): “We must insist on access to these flying machines. In Los Angeles, the military has seized the vehicles and won't let us examine them."

In 1955, with a strange call for the height of the Cold War, the commander of * Pacific Armed Forces Douglas MacArthur turned to the military and scientific forces of the nation: “The nations of the world must unite, since the next war will be an interplanetary war ... The nations of the world will have to ... form a common front against aliens from other planets.

Mikhail Gorbachev: "The UFO phenomenon exists and must be taken very seriously."

Richard Nixon, President of the United States from 1969 to 1974: “I still do not have the right to discuss information about UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence that the government has. Discussions on this issue are ongoing."

Paul Hellier, I am a former Minister of Defense of Canada: "UFOs are as real as the planes flying over our heads."

Speaking of UFOs and aliens, it is worth bearing in mind that they all do not have to be aliens from other planets in our solar system. The facts show that representatives of other worlds arrive on our planet, but on the planet Earth itself there is a parallel civilization living life invisible to us.

Here is what the world-famous Edward Snowden said: “The highest echelons of power do not know what to do with UFOs, and they feed citizens the official version that they are all just meteorological probes or natural phenomena. But the documents say UFOs are real. The transport ships of this civilization fly not only in the Earth's atmosphere, but have been seen on the seabed, in hydrothermal vents, volcanoes and directly in solar orbit.

The CIA has data from tracking systems and deep-sea sonars, but they have the status of a state secret, and even scientists do not have access to this data about these objects. This species is smarter than Homo sapiens and lives in the Earth's mantle. This is the only place where conditions have been more or less stable for billions of years. Extremophiles can live in a variety of temperatures and have been able to thrive and develop intelligence at an accelerated pace. Homo sapiens and they evolved at the same rate, but their living conditions in the mantle of the Earth protected their civilization from many cataclysms that occurred on the surface of the earth.

The President receives daily briefings on the activities of this civilization and the movement of its devices - UFOs. Analysts believe that their technology is so advanced that we have little chance of surviving any potential war with them.

The general consensus is that we are just ants from their point of view and there is a small chance that they will no longer pay attention to us. But the military is also considering the possibility of aggression and the current contingency plan includes a plan to detonate nuclear weapons in deep caves to "seal" the enemy in the hope of destroying their communications, which will prevent further attacks from the bowels of the earth.

I would tell you what is written in the "Book of Secrets", but then I will have to kill you“, - this is how US President Barack Obama joked to the well-known journalist Michael Smerkonish.

What are the world rulers hiding from us, forcing society to live by their rules!?

Dear readers!

We cannot stand being deceived and led by the nose.

We fear for the future, wishing only the best for ourselves and our loved ones.

We always want to know the truth and are looking for the hidden truth.

And so now it is very important for us to think carefully, opening our clouded consciousness.

Every new day we wake up, turn on the TV, open a fresh newspaper, go to the Internet and, like sponges, absorb all the information that the media pours on us every day in an unceasing stream. We rarely think about the degree of veracity, on a global scale, of all the information that comes to us. We are used to the fact that the latest news that we learn about is more or less true, and this is how we build our new day, our everyday life, our life.

We blindly believed everything that was pumped into us in full, starting from a very young age. All cartoons, movies, books and magazines, and finally textbooks at school (especially in history!) extolled our system, the way of life of a person and everything else connected with it. We were brainwashed, but we blindly believed and dutifully existed.

Sometimes the truth is so harsh that perhaps many would rather live under the veil without knowing what is really going on. It is always difficult to take off rose-colored glasses, and even more so to recognize yourself as a blind person, or a narrow-minded person, unable to distinguish truth from fiction. And this is probably the scariest thing. We are ready to deny elementary things, just not to admit our own blindness. All this is characteristic of man, and only this can explain the fact that we often behave like a herd, easily subjected to the most, sometimes, ridiculous suggestion.

Suggestion- this is the basis of any religion, suggestion - this is the strength of any power, a means of controlling the masses.

I am not trying to open your eyes, but just think for a moment that everything around you is created only to control you. Everything! Everything you see around you, everything you hear, you smell. Even your feelings sometimes work against you, and these are not paranoid thoughts. It's just that it is so deeply rooted in us that we cannot notice it, to our great regret.

ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS AND THE FAKE HISTORY OF HUMANITY

The history of the world is not really the way we are used to accepting it. In ancient times, various highly developed civilizations inhabited the earth for millions of years.

The existence of ancient civilizations is confirmed by material finds, which are sometimes attributed to the activities of aliens or declared hoaxes.

For example, finds in mines along millions of rock layers of a gold chain, an iron parallelepiped, a 20-centimeter nail.

Or plastic columns found in the coal mines of the USSR, an iron meter cylinder with round inclusions of yellow metal. An imprint of a boot protector in sandstone, found in the Gobi Desert, whose age is estimated at 10 million years, as reported by the Soviet writer A. Kazantsev, or a similar imprint in limestone blocks in the state of Nevada (USA).

Porcelain high-voltage glass, overgrown with fossilized mollusks, whose age is estimated at 500 thousand years, etc. These few finds so far allow us to conclude that the ancient civilization not only mined coal, had electricity and the production of plastics, but also that there was not a single developed civilization on Earth.

In 1965, the Italian scientist Colossimo summarized the data of all the then known archaeological expeditions and ancient written sources and concluded that in the past the Earth was the scene of military operations with the use of nuclear weapons. In the "Puranas", in the "Code of Rio" of the Maya, in the Bible, among the Arvaks, among the Cherokee Indians and among some other peoples - everywhere weapons are described that are very reminiscent of nuclear weapons.

In ancient times, people were of considerable stature. Today, perhaps, there is not a single nation that does not have legends about giants. In all ancient written sources that have come down to us: the Bible, Avesta, Vedas, Edda, Chinese and Tibetan chronicles, etc. - everywhere we come across messages about giants. Even in Assyrian cuneiform clay tablets, the giant Izdubar is reported, who towered over all other people, like a cedar over a bush.

Many ancient structures were not built by our civilization. Official science simply does not recognize this or prefers to refute the existing facts.

The next lie is...

THE TRUE BIBLE

That Bible, which we use today, was repeatedly copied and corrected to please the ruling kings and sovereigns. I will stop only on some moments.

Why is there no murder in the seven deadly sins of a person - the most important and grave sin!?

In the real Bible, Adam and Eve were expelled from Eden not because Adam ate the forbidden fruit from the tree of Knowledge, but because his son Cain killed Abel. It turned out that knowledge is a more serious crime than murder! After such a replacement, it became possible to carry out murders with a Bible in hand. Remember the history - numerous bloody wars in the name of God, the Inquisition, executions with the blessing of the Church, and the rulers at all times persecuted people striving for knowledge.

When reading the Bible, one nonsense immediately catches your eye - in the book "Genesis" it is written: "God created Adam and Eve ... Eve gave birth to Adam two sons - Cain and Abel ... Cain killed Abel and was expelled by God ... Cain knew his wife, and she bore him a son, Enoch…”

Q: Where did Cain's wife come from?

Who gave birth to all these sons, where did all these women come from?

The biblical story of Noah's ark has come down to us in a somewhat distorted form. Mount Ararat was far from the only place on Earth that was not affected by the flood.

In addition to Noah, many people and animals were saved in various parts of Asia and Europe.

The Bible says “Do not build temples on earth, build a temple in your soul”, but again, the church tries to keep silent about this, thinking about material wealth and power that gives temple building.

The end of the first part .... In the next part, the Truth about UFOs, Secret world governments, The truth about the end of the world.

Mood: As always