Born in the USSR, in Ukraine in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. In 1973 he graduated from the Dnepropetrovsk Metallurgical Institute. In 1973-1995 he worked at the Ermakov Ferroalloy Plant (Kazakhstan), holding positions from engineer to first deputy director. Author of inventions and articles in scientific and technical journals. He did not join the CPSU. Based on his experience as a leader, he developed a new management concept called "delocracy" (1993).

He entered politics in the early 1990s. He supported financially the editorial office of the newspaper "Day" (now - "Tomorrow"). After the split in 1994 of the National Salvation Front (FNS) into FNS-1 Ilya Konstantinov and FNS-2 Valery Smirnova is a member of the political council of FNS-2. In 1995, the Ermakovskiy plant was sold to foreigners. Y. Mukhin came into conflict with the new owners and was forced to leave Kazakhstan and move to Moscow, where at the end of the year he founded the Duel newspaper, of which he is the editor-in-chief and regular contributor to this day.

Author of numerous articles, almost three dozen books and brochures on social and historical topics. Founder of the series of books about the war "War and Us", published by the EKSMO publishing house. Founder and leader of the People's Will Army (AVN). Founder of the Delocracy Foundation.

In his works, Yuri Mukhin appears as a “subverter of authorities” and casts doubt on many generally accepted truths, putting forward, at the same time, his own social, historical and even philosophical theories. Some of Mukhin's ideas look more reasoned, others less, but almost all of them are actively criticized by many readers of his works. Mukhin usually agrees with criticism containing indications of unprincipled factual errors in particular moments, but almost never abandons the basic concepts.

He put forward his own, as well as developed others, ideas and hypotheses:

any work in the production or non-production sphere should be evaluated not by the head of the performer of this work, but exclusively by the consumer;

the first president of Russia, B. N. Yeltsin, died in 1996, and until the official announcement of his death in 2007, he was replaced by a double or doubles;

Polish officers in Katyn were killed by the German occupiers;

Best of the day

the main reason for the defeat of the Red Army in the summer campaign of 1941 was the lack of modern communications in the Soviet troops, unlike the enemy;

I. V. Stalin was killed, at a minimum, by failure to provide assistance for a stroke, and L. P. Beria was shot dead without trial or investigation as a result of a conspiracy by N. S. Khrushchev and a number of persons close to the latter;

Stalin and Beria were never the initiators of mass repressions and opposed any lawlessness, and those repressions that took place with their undoubted participation were justified;

Stalin sought to remove the Communist Party from power and turn it into a public organization of a spiritual and educational type, like a church (spiritual order);

the order to bring the troops to full combat readiness before the German attack was given by Stalin in a timely manner - on June 18, 1941, but was sabotaged by the generals;

the Zionists artificially provoke the emergence of anti-Semitism in different countries in order to hasten the departure of Jews to Israel, and even collaborated with Hitler for this purpose;

T. D. Lysenko was right in all the main provisions of his theory, and his opponents were pseudoscientific charlatans;

the only reason for the "holodomor" in Ukraine and the Kuban was the destruction of draft cattle (oxen) by the peasants themselves in the process of collectivization;

special services of different countries in the process of many years of corruption turn into anti-state criminal formations;

the Americans never landed on the moon as part of the Apollo program;

the quality of military personnel training before the Great Patriotic War was low, and this, to a large extent, predetermined defeats and unnecessary losses throughout the war;

God does not exist, but all living beings have a Spirit - the basis of animal thinking, and a person, in addition, the Soul - the basis of human essence, and both phenomena are practically immortal, but material;

the merits of German aces pilots during World War II are mostly falsified by Goebbels' propaganda and the pilots themselves;

the Holocaust is questioned and the idea of ​​cooperation between "Jewish racists" and German Nazis is developed;

katyn and muhin
Alex 21.02.2009 05:00:43

It is a shame to read Mukhin's clumsy nonsense about Katyn in his Anti-Russian meanness.
Trying to make a career of protecting Russia's reputation, he commits anti-Russian meanness, preventing
self-purification of Russia from the mistakes of the past. Russia is much higher than him and does not need his protection, and
more on his level. Instead of stubbornly poisoning his country, it would not hurt him to go to Europe or America with lectures in order to be buried under rotten eggs.

• Genre:
• A state ready for war is a state ready to win a war. This is a state in which all the causes leading to defeat have been eliminated to the maximum, and the circumstances that are the causes of victory have been strengthened to the required magnitude. Is it necessary to prove that all this work must be done in peacetime? Precisely in order to preserve this peaceful time. Your attention is invited to a book in which all the reasons that led to the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, and all the reasons that led to defeats at its initial stage, are consistently analyzed.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• Why did they fight in Afghanistan and did we fight in vain? In the minds of some citizens of our society, there is an opinion that eighteen-year-old boys were driven by carriages to be slaughtered in a senseless, useless war. It is not clear to citizens that false ideological clichés live in their own heads, and most importantly, they are unaware that different people's heads are arranged differently. As the book presented to your attention proves, the entry of Soviet troops into Afghanistan in 1979 was not a gamble, not a mistake, as liberals try to convince the public, but a strategic necessity. In that specific historical situation, after the expulsion of the Americans from Iran and the sharp activation of nationalist groups in the dangerous vicinity of our southern borders, the Soviet leadership had no other choice. returned to their homeland. Nine years of the Afghan war are nine years of peace and tranquility in the Central Asian Soviet republics. Was it worth it, given how events unfolded in the future? The answer is yes, it was worth it ...
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• The role of I.V. Stalin's victory in the Great Patriotic War has long been significantly underestimated. Nikita Khrushchev agreed to the point that I.V. Stalin in military talent: we won in spite of Stalin, he only interfered with our generals, Khrushchev argued. In his book, the famous writer, publicist, researcher of the history of war Yu.I. Mukhin proves that I.V. Stalin was not only in office, but also in essence the Supreme Commander of the Soviet Army. His brilliant leadership of military operations, deep knowledge of military affairs, and outstanding organizational skills were recognized by both Soviet and German commanders. Without Stalin, there would be no Victory, concludes Yu. Mukhin and convincingly confirms his point of view.
• | | (3)

• Genre:
• After September 11, 2001, when New York was attacked by air and ion attacks, the world became different. But there is still no answer about who initiated the attacks then. However, many questions remained after the 1999 Moscow tragedy. Then hundreds of Muscovites died under the ruins of blown up houses. This book tells about several daring and cynical scams that "cranked" because people in general are too lazy to think about things that do not concern their daily lives. From this book you will learn about what you cannot immediately believe, because the author did not immediately believe that such meanness and arrogance are possible.
• | | (2)

• Genre:
• The people of the USSR wanted to live in a single Union and even declared this at a referendum, and the bureaucracy divided the Soviet Union into parts The people declared their desire for a richer life, and the bureaucracy made them poor. him to a permanent place of residence The people never refused to work, and the bureaucracy, having ruined the economy, made them unemployed for him the laws, but also criminals from the authorities who violate them. The people are waiting for a truly people's president.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• ???????????????????????????????????? Violating all taboos and prohibitions, without regard to the Kremlin officialdom and tacit censorship , this sensational investigation exposes the most "untouchable" pseudo-heroes of the Patriotic Wars of 1812 and 1941-1945. and answers the most uncomfortable questions: Who "set up" the Russian army near Borodino, deliberately dooming Bagration's troops to death? Why was it necessary to surrender Moscow to the French, although there was no military necessity for this? Through whose fault was Napoleon able to escape from Russia, avoiding certain captivity? Why did such a terrible price have to be paid for the victories in both Patriotic Wars? What do Zhukov and Kutuzov have in common? And how to expose the MAFIA, which, for the sake of its own selfish interests, replaces history with propaganda, glorifying failed operations like the Zhukovsky offensive near Yelnya or the shameful fiasco of Kutuzov on the Berezina and hushing up such brilliant victories of Russian weapons as Preussisch-Eylau and the Voroshilov counterattack near Soltsy, which became the first successful operation of the Red Army in the Great Patriotic War.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• A sensational book by the most uncompromising historian and publicist! Refutation of the meanest anti-Russian myths. Exposing the main falsification of the 20th century - the so-called "Katyn case". A slap in the face to the “liberal” sing-alongs of the Nazis, who are ready for any meanness, just to denigrate the Soviet past. shot not by the NKVD, but by the German invaders! This investigation not only reveals the mechanics of deception, demonstrating exactly how the Katyn fake was concocted, but also exposes the customers of the slander, designed to quarrel the Russian and Polish peoples and re-inflate the "old dispute between the Slavs ...".
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• The power in the USSR in the last period of its existence turned out to be staffed with vile people. But still, even these people were aware that the people are the master, and one must at least formally report to the master. The current Rulers are not even aware of this. What does it mean? And this means that these are no longer servants of the people, but a rebellious herd in the place of servants. And this herd must be brought to consciousness - to the consciousness that the servants serve the people, and not the people to them ...
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• The book by the famous publicist Yuri Mukhin tells about Jewish racism. Analyzing the main works of the ideologists of this movement, the author convincingly proves that Jewish racism is dangerous, first of all, to the Jews themselves, living both in Russia and in other countries of the world. Separate chapters of the book are devoted to the activities of Jewish racists in our country, who, hiding behind the facade various public organizations are carrying out subversive work aimed at destabilizing the situation in the Russian Federation. In particular, the author pays much attention to the trial of the notorious “human rights activist” A. Brod, who propagates racial hatred and xenophobia under the guise of fighting anti-Semitism. The book will be of interest to all readers who are not indifferent to the problems raised in it.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• It is necessary to study history in order not to repeat the mistakes at the present time. During the Great Patriotic War, the Soviet people and the Red Army suffered heavy human and material losses, but defeated almost all of Europe. Victory is good, but are the true reasons for our huge losses revealed? The book examines the causes of the losses of the Soviet people from the side from which these reasons are never considered - from the standpoint of the low moral and professional quality of Soviet generals and regular officers. For the first time, the deep foundations of meanness, cowardice and betrayal of the Soviet generals are analyzed, the foundations of why the Soviet officers on average were inferior to the German ones.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• The communists of the Soviet Union were always divided into two parts: some became communists in order to build a justice society for the peoples of the USSR, others signed up for the Communist Party in order to receive material benefits. The conflict between them flared up immediately after the communists took power in Russia. As a result, the leader of the peoples of the USSR I.V. Stalin was killed, after which the opportunists of the CPSU finally won.
• | | (0)

• Genre:
• Today they still give 0.7 euros for the US dollar, tomorrow they will be punched in the face! What is money, what is its essence, how to make your country rich with money and how to ruin it with money? In this book, you will learn not only that, but also why US dollars are already dangerous to consider as money.

The human mind is designed in such a way that it cannot "embrace the immensity." As a result, people, in matters outside their sphere of competence, are forced to rely on the point of view of experts on a particular issue, which, in turn, actualizes the question of the “quality” of these same experts. Especially given the following statements:

A person can be delusional;

A person can purposefully lie;

Lies are best absorbed when they are mixed with the truth;

Most people uncritically perceive the opinion of those whom they consider to be experts and absolute authorities on a particular issue.

The foregoing makes it possible to understand that one of the ways to manage social processes is to "create" such "experts" who will analyze the situation and make forecasts in the "necessary" way for their "creators", thereby directing the course of undesirable social processes in a safe direction.

It is possible to identify such experts, firstly, by following the ancient wisdom “judge not by words, but by deeds”, and secondly, by a critical perception of any socially significant information, regardless of the degree of authority of the one who announces it.

This article is devoted to one of these "experts", Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin.

Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin suddenly gained fame and undeniable authority in those circles of Russian society that are commonly called patriotic in the mid-90s of the last millennium thanks to the investigation of the Katyn case. In an atmosphere of almost universal betrayal of the interests of Russia by those in power, when almost everything surrendered and betrayed, when the corrupt government was ready in court to officially admit the "guilt" of the USSR for the execution of Polish prisoners of war by the Germans; It was Yury Mukhin's "Katyn Detective", which smashed the Polish version of events to smithereens and did not leave a stone unturned from the Polish evidence base, became the very argument that did not allow injustice to happen.

As our remarkable historian Arsen Martirosyan notes in one of his works, there were two cases in modern national history when lone researchers, in conditions of inactivity or outright betrayal of the official authorities, “took fire upon themselves”, fighting for the interests of the country, and won:

1. William Pokhlebkin in the story of attempts to ban the USSR (by the way, including the Poles) from using the word "vodka" on the drinks of the same name.
2. Yuri Mukhin in the history of the Katyn case.

However, in life everything flows and everything changes, and no one has canceled the wisdom "judge not by words, but by deeds." For the first time, I was forced to think about the true role of Mukhin by a quote from an article by Maxim Bochkovsky Trotsky's cause under the banner of Stalin, which, I will not hide, initially shocked me:

“Mukhin is a provocateur who has long been trained for this role, who was led ... It's simple. Someone's penetrating eyes tracked - here is a certain Mukhin, his head is working, and then according to the worked out scenario, approximately the same as it was with Solzhenitsin ... ".

“... You must admit that Mukhin reduced everything to a confrontation between various factions of the CPSU. At the same time, it is silent that revolutions, wars, perestroika - everything was planned “over the hill”, in order to destroy Russia as a geopolitical rival of the West. That is, the main screenwriter and customer at Mukhin turned out to be hidden! Mukhin deliberately does not notice the various management hierarchies. It all came down to a fight for a place at the feeder ... And if so, since there is no complete clarity, since the object that acts against Russia remains invisible, then after a while you can either make a remake or make a new scenario for the death of Russia. After all, the object is hidden, the targets have not been identified ... That's what Mukhin is. He is apparently not very happy with the role that he has to fulfill now, but obligations ... Such as he is good at “cling” - you won’t come off ...”

“…It's obvious. All previous activities of Mukhin as a historian do not prevent him now from helping the enemies of Russia and are not in conflict with his previous work. All his facts (in his books) on Stalin are built in strict accordance with certain goals and allow you to act in a similar way. And the image (and only the image) of a patriot was created for him through the courts…”

“... Mukhin is a Western project similar to Rezun. We realized a few years ago that Mukhin would end up like this. That he is a provocateur. You could see that in the way he covered some topics heavily, and he heavily defaulted on others.”

However, the following actions of Mukhin prompted me to really “tackle” this issue, which, to my deepest regret, fully confirmed the above assessment of his activities:

1. His signature number 7 in support of Putin's resignation on the site "Putin must go" (www.putinavotstavku.org), where Yuri Mukhin, who positions himself as a patriot, found himself in the same company with representatives of the domestic fifth column - liberals, which in itself is suggestive; for a person who positions himself as a patriot, despite all his disagreements with the authorities, simply cannot have anything in common with the open enemies of the Motherland, which are the liberals. If this common thing is still found ... It means that this person is not such a patriot in fact, as he positions himself.
2. Mukhin's books "Who Really Started World War II?" and "Dangerous Secret", in which he “appoints” the Poles and Zionists as the true culprits of the outbreak of the war, while completely silent about the role of the Anglo-Saxons.

3. Katyn question.

When you start to explore the activities of Yuri Mukhin generally, and not on specific issues, then even such a seemingly exclusively advantageous topic for Yuri Ignatievich as the Katyn case does not look so unambiguous. First of all, this fact attracts attention: all modern serious researchers of this issue, such as Vladislav Shved, come one to one to the same conclusions regarding the guilt of the Germans, which Yuri Mukhin came to 15 years ago. Involuntarily the question arises: and why, in fact, do we have to conduct repeated studies with a delay of 15 years, instead of simply relying on the results of Mukhin's research? What's stopping you? And Mukhin's reputation interferes. And the point, it seems to me, is not even that Yuri Ignatievich has been in fierce opposition to any government in the country for all 15 years. Not that he is not a historian by training. In the end, this did not affect the seriousness of his research. The fact is that back in the 90s, Yuri Mukhin developed a reputation as an extremely, shall we say, ambiguous person, relying on whose opinion it is very risky for a person who has weight in scientific circles.

For example, on the one hand, in the 90s, Yuri Ignatievich simply brilliantly conducts a study of the Katyn case, and on the other hand, at the same time, he actively promotes the version that Yeltsin died, and in 1996 he was elected President of Russia his clone. Now imagine, for example, that some domestic historian, in support of the version that the Poles were shot by the Germans in Katyn, cites evidence of Yuri Ignatievich. And in response, for example, he receives a question from his opponents: “Is this the same Mukhin who claims that Yeltsin is dead? And on the evidence of such a person you justify your point of view?

That is, we can draw an unambiguous conclusion: in the 1990s, Yuri Mukhin, with his study of the Katyn case, gained unconditional authority in patriotic circles and at the same time, through his activities as a whole, created a situation where it was impossible to use his works in protecting the interests of Russia at the official level. Of course, in the 1990s, the authorities would hardly have used the results of Mukhin's research, but in the early to mid-2000s, before the launch of the third de-Stalinization campaign, the situation was somewhat different. As a result, these studies have to be repeated with a delay of about 15 years.

Well, involuntarily, the question arises: is it all by chance, especially in the light of his latest deeds?

4. The theme of the Great Patriotic War.

First of all, it should be noted that Yuri Mukhin is a person who has holistic thinking - thinking that allows you to see the big picture and identify the cause-and-effect relationships of certain processes. Why am I so sure of this? Yes, simply because Yuri Mukhin, by the nature of his previous activity, is a “techie”. Any "techie", by virtue of his profession, is faced with the principles "practice is the criterion of truth" And "criteria for evaluating activities - the result". For example, I am a systems engineer - a specialist in computer networks. So, they evaluate me simply: a network works - a good engineer, does not work - a bad one, and no one is interested in the subtleties of my work. Therefore, in order to be able to solve problems, I just need to know and understand what and how the network works. The same can be observed in any other area of ​​production activity. That is, both the education system and professional activities develop a holistic thinking in the “techie”, which helps a lot in research activities. What Yuri Ignatievich proved in practice in his Katyn Detective.

The study of any process can develop in the direction of:

1. "From the general to the specific".
2. "From Particular to General".

The first approach provides a higher degree of error-free research. As for the second approach, there is a situation where:

1. due to the peculiarities of the thinking of a particular researcher who “does not see the forest for the trees”, the research process may become fruitless;
2. researcher purposefully confuses the situation by paying excessive attention to some issues and silent about others. At the same time, he either “forgets” to link all these questions into a single “general”, or, due to omissions, gives out as a result a certain distorted “general”.

If we consider Mukhin's research on the subject of the Great Patriotic War from this angle, then we can see that Yuri Ignatievich is a master of using the second approach, moreover, in the variant of purposefully confusing the situation. Yes, he has many brilliant works on the topic of war:

1. debunking the myth of the "vaunted" German aces;
2. study of the problem with the means of communication in the Red Army;
3. debunking the myth that the troops of the Red Army did not know when the war would start and were taken by surprise (the order of June 19, 1941 for the western border military districts to increase combat readiness), and so on.

But after all, all these are private questions that do not explain the main thing! And what is the main question of the Great Patriotic War?

The main question of the Great Patriotic War is simple: what were the reasons for the catastrophe of the Red Army in 1941, despite the fact that its military potential, at least in quantitative terms, was much higher than that of the German one?

To get an answer to this question, first of all, it is necessary to understand how the Red Army was going to fight in the event of an attack on the USSR, what its strategy of warfare should have been.

This is the way Arsen Martirosyan went. Our remarkable historian revealed that in the fall of 1940, the General Staff, headed by Shaposhnikov, developed a war strategy approved by Stalin, which was based on the principle of "active defense" (in short, the war was planned to be waged on the model of the war of 1812, luring the enemy deep into country). And this is fair. After all, given the open spaces of the USSR, no human resources would be enough to reliably protect the entire perimeter of the western border. However, as Arsen Martirosyan again revealed, as soon as Zhukov became Chief of the General Staff, the principle of "active defense" was (without agreement with Stalin) replaced by the principle of "hard defense" (not a step back), when it was supposed to beat off the enemy's blow on the border , then go on the offensive and wage war on enemy territory. However, taking into account the open spaces of the USSR on the western border, the situation turned out when the Germans, having fewer troops, concentrated shock fists in specific directions, creating an advantage in these areas, and went through the defenses of the Red Army like a knife through butter.

Here, in short, is the whole answer to the main question of the Great Patriotic War.

So why is it that Yuri Mukhin, paying much attention to this period, so diligently avoids this main issue? And he bypasses it because with the answer to this main question, many others arise:

1. who carried out the substitution of the principle of "active defense" for the principle of "tough defense" and in general, what is it: stupidity or betrayal?
2. how did the chief of the General Staff become a man who "organically hates staff work," according to Rokossovsky's characterization?
3. Why was the order of June 19 to put the troops on high combat readiness not carried out in many units?

And many others. And the answers to these and subsequent questions lead to a completely different, higher level of interstate and intercivilizational relations and, in the end, reveal the centuries-old process of confrontation between Russian civilization (Rus - Russian Empire - USSR - Russia) and the West with aggressive essence of the latter.

That is precisely why Yuri Mukhin does not touch on this main issue of the Great Patriotic War. And his books are proof of this. "Dangerous Secret". But more on that later.

5. The masks are off.

In recent years, as I wrote above, something happened that showed the true face of Yuri Mukhin:

1. His signature in support of Putin's resignation.
2. Book "Who Really Started World War II?".
3. Book "A Dangerous Secret"

Signature #7

1. The system of state power is the system of government of the country. History teaches us that the breakdown of the system of government plunges the country into chaos. The restoration of the management system and the accumulation of managerial experience takes many years and is accompanied by a colossal effort. That is, no matter how cumbersome and inefficient the system of governing the country, its presence is certainly better than its absence.

2. There are two ways to change the situation in the country and in power: revolutionary and evolutionary. The essence of the first path is the demolition of the control system and the construction of a new one on its ruins. The essence of the second is to change the existing system:

Through pressure on the authorities from the outside in order to intensify the reform processes;

Through pressure on the government from within through penetration into power structures.

The revolutionary path is the path of chaos, terror, tragic mistakes of government, and so on, as a result of which the vast majority of the country's citizens suffer. I.e, the revolutionary way of changing the situation in the country is obviously worse than the evolutionary one.

3. The most important quality of the state power system is sustainability. In the absence of an Idea that unites the vast majority of members of society and is expressed in an understandable ideology (as in today's Russia), or in the conditions of the official existence of an ideology that is obviously false and unviable (Marxism in the USSR), the system of state power is not a monolith, but is a system with clan-related basis and multidirectional interests of various groups. In such a situation, the guarantor of the stability of the system of state power is a specific person. The departure of such a person from the political arena inevitably entails the degradation of the system of power, as a result of which a situation may well arise when “the top cannot, but the bottom does not want”.

The peculiarity of the present moment is that The guarantor of the stability of the power system of Russia is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. Respectively, in favor of Putin's departure, Mukhin is working for the process of destruction of Russia. And this means that he can be asked the Stalinist question: “Are you a fool or an enemy?” Only now, Yuri Ignatievich does not look like a fool. Mukhin is a man of extraordinary intelligence, which he proved more than once. But if he is not a fool, then who is?

"Who Really Started World War II?"

In this book, Yuri Ignatievich "appoints" the Poles as one of the hidden culprits in unleashing the war.

Features of relations between Russia and Poland are determined by two factors:

1. At one time, in the confrontation between our countries for superiority in the Slavic world, Poland turned out to be the losing side, which gave rise to fear in the Poles towards Russia. And in historical self-awareness, Russia means much more to Poland than Poland does to Russia. If Poland is not particularly important for us, just another obstacle to state development, then Russia for them is a state entity that is a very strong irritant and through the image of which all self-determination and all perception of history are built.
2. The Polish cultural complex of messianism in relation to the entire space to the east of Poland, that is, in relation to the Russian lands. All this space, in the Polish perception, is the East - not a geographical, but a cultural concept, based on the conviction of Western superiority and Eastern inferiority. Accordingly, domination over the East, in the Polish understanding, is the duty of the West and Poland as its vanguard, its mission. That is, Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are the space of the Polish messianic duty.

As a result of the above, Poland simply could not help being an ally of Hitler in his plans to conquer the USSR. However, this is only one side of the issue.

Even now, for the most part, the vast majority of the population of any human community is politically inert (except for the Jews), and before the change in the ratio of the frequencies of biological and social time, they generally treated politics on the principle of “not our business.” Thus, the policy of this or that state is determined by the elites. The “quality” of the leadership of the Polish elite in their state is such that Poland has gone through several partitions, but its elite has not learned anything.
And Mukhin is trying to convince that the Polish elite, offended by the mind and with inflated conceit, played such a subtle behind-the-scenes political game, manipulating Hitler and pushing him to war?

"A Dangerous Secret"

In the book "Dangerous Secret" Yury Mukhin “appoints” the Zionists as another hidden culprit for the outbreak of World War II.

Digression: on the "origin" of Zionism.

Before analyzing the role of Zionism in the Second World War, it is necessary to understand its origin, because it is far from being as unambiguous as it is now commonly represented. Furthermore, at the origins of its appearance are not Jews at all!

It is officially considered that "Zionism is a Jewish national movement, the purpose of which is the unification and revival of the Jewish people in their historical homeland - Israel, as well as the ideological concept on which this movement is based", and the reason for its occurrence is considered to be, supposedly, always common among the Jews living in the Diaspora, the desire to return to Zion. However, the question immediately arises: given that Jews have been living in the diaspora for more than one millennium, why did Zionism, as an ideology, emerge only in the 19th century? Especially considering the fact that Jews have always been politically active, and the percentage of educated people in the Jewish environment has always been high?

First of all, it is necessary to understand under what conditions it was possible for an idea to be widely disseminated among the people (at the time of the 19th century with its absence of the Internet).

1. The idea should "meet the aspirations" of the people, find a response in their collective unconscious.
2. The idea should be clearly expressed in vocabulary.
3. There must be a structure whose members would be purposefully engaged in the dissemination of the idea.
4. Sufficient funding of this structure is needed so that its members are not distracted by worries about "daily bread".

Only the fulfillment of all four conditions at the same time gave a result.

And if we examine the emergence of Zionism as an ideology from these positions, we can easily find that the threads are stretching ... to the British Isles.

The policy of the British Empire was based on several principles:

1. Control of communications, primarily maritime (Gibraltar, Cape of Good Hope, Suez Canal, Malta, Falkland Islands - control over the straits from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific).
2. The policy of "checks and balances" and the struggle of "proxy hands". Any strong or potentially strong power on the European continent was perceived by the British as hostile, and in order to fight it, the British did everything to “create” a strong rival to this state, and then “pushed them head-on”. As a result of the war, there was a mutual exhaustion of the parties. The most striking example of history is the "cultivation" of Nazi Germany as a counterbalance to the USSR.
3. Long-term planning, work for the long term, when preparations for the implementation of certain British projects began long, sometimes decades, before they were put into practice.

In addition, in the 19th century, the British developed "the principle of ensuring the rights of the small peoples of Europe" when separatist sentiments were deliberately fomented in a multinational state, which led to increased social tension and destabilization of the situation inside the country - the enemy of Britain. And this principle was applied by the British so actively in the 19th century that Lord Palmerston, the British Prime Minister, even received the nickname Lord Pyro.

In 1859, work began on the construction of the Suez Canal in Egypt, thanks to which the sea route from Europe to Asia was simplified, that is, a node appeared in the system of maritime communications that was not controlled by the British. Egypt at that time was part of the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire, which was not only a multinational, but also a multi-confessional state, and the relationship between representatives of various religions was far from being good neighborly. France was considered the formal "defender" of the Catholics of the Turkish Empire. The "defender" of the Orthodox is the Russian Empire. It was in order to have a reason to intervene in internal Turkish affairs with long-term plans to establish control over the Suez Canal that the British turned their attention to the Jews. Well, then “miraculously” the necessary four conditions were met:

1. The idea of ​​Zion does resonate in the Jewish collective unconscious.
2. In 1862, a certain Moses Hess, who, coincidentally, played a significant role in shaping the views of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, wrote a work "Rome and Jerusalem", in which he formulates those postulates that later form the basis of Zionism.
3. For implementation "the principle of ensuring the rights of the small peoples of Europe" British agents formed structures: "Young Poland", "Young Italy" and so on, in which young people of the corresponding nationality underwent "ideological" training, and then became the spreaders of separatist or revolutionary ideas within their nations. One of these structures was "Young Israel", created by Giuseppe Mazzini, an Italian adventurer who was on the "content" of British intelligence. Later, members of this organization stood at the origins of the creation of the Jewish lodge "B'nai B'rith", which is still active today.
4. There were also no problems with financing, given the wealth of the British Empire at that time.

This is how the foundations were laid from which Zionism later grew.

As for the relationship between the Zionists and the Nazis, then, of course, their cooperation took place, and Yuri Mukhin in his book shows this well:

1. the Zionists welcomed the rise of the Nazis to power;
2. Zionists in the 30s financially supported the Nazis, transferring to the latter about 126 million dollars (more than 2 billion in today's equivalent);
3. the Zionists, by declaring war on Germany in 1939 on behalf of all Jews, gave the Nazis a formal reason to imprison Jews in concentration camps as a potential fifth column, similar to what Roosevelt later did with Japanese Americans;
4. the Zionists were not at all eager to fight the Nazis even after it became known about the mass extermination of Jews on the territory of the USSR.

All this is so. But does this mean, as Yuri Mukhin argues, that the Zionists were the "hidden force" that created the conditions for unleashing the war and pushed Hitler to start it? We can confidently say that this is not the case. This is supported by the fact that after the war the Zionists were unable to achieve the establishment of the State of Israel on their own. The British and American establishment said no, and the Zionists were powerless. The key role in the creation of Israel belongs to Stalin, without whom Israel would simply not exist. The reasons why Stalin took this step is a topic for a separate article, but it is quite obvious that this was done not at all because of Stalin's special love for the Jews and not under pressure from the Zionists, but based on the interests of the USSR.

Thus, it turns out that according to Mukhin, the Zionists were so powerful that they were able to unleash the Second World War and at the same time were not strong enough to push through the creation of Israel.

Yes, the Zionists tarnished themselves by collaborating with the Nazis, but it is clear that they were only using the favorable moment when their goals - the resettlement of Jews from Germany to Palestine, and the goals of the Nazis - for the Jews to leave Germany, coincided. After all, politics is often a messy business. But after all, seizing the right moment is one thing, and purposeful long-term creation of conditions for organizing war, pushing for war is quite another. Mukhin mixes these things, and mixes them, in my opinion, on purpose.

Thus, it turns out that neither the Poles nor the Zionists are suitable for the role of those very behind-the-scenes "powers of this world" who manipulated Hitler like a puppet. But then one of two things is possible:

1. either the degree of understanding of Yuri Ignatievich is not high enough, as a result of which he is simply mistaken;
2. or he deliberately "casts a shadow on the wattle fence."

It is hard to believe that Yuri Mukhin is mistaken. Firstly, because he is a man of extraordinary intelligence, and secondly, because in the 21st century, historical research, first of all, by Arsen Martirosyan, and after him by Nikolai Starikov, made a real breakthrough in understanding the hidden meanings of ongoing events and processes. Thus, the centuries-old subversive work of the West against Russian civilization and the organization of the Second World War with the aim of destroying the USSR, first of all, as part of this work, the threads of which lead to Foggy Albion, ceased to be a secret. And Yuri Ignatievich cannot but know about it.

Thus, against the backdrop of these latest studies, Mukhin's book appears to be nothing more than an attempt to "direct the arrows" of guilt for unleashing the Second World War on the Poles and Zionists, thereby removing the Anglo-Saxons "from under the blow".

6. Conclusions.

1. Yuri Mukhin is the “weapon” of the second, chronological, priority of generalized controls. This is an undoubtedly intelligent person who has done a lot of useful work, in particular, with the Katyn issue. But all these useful deeds are in order to gain the trust of the patriotic part of the population of Russia, to become an authority, and then, already being an authority, purposefully distort information and, thereby, contribute to the formation of false ideas about the historical process in people.
2. It is necessary to treat the work of Yuri Ignatievich flexibly. We must not forget the rule that "a lie is best absorbed when it is mixed with the truth," which means that now that the role of Yuri Mukhin has been revealed, one should not just take and discard everything that he wrote. It is necessary to identify and use the really valuable and important in Mukhin's work, such as, for example, the study of the Katyn case, and discard everything that Mukhin deliberately distorts in order to fulfill the role that is destined for him.

On March 22, 1949, an outstanding Russian writer, publicist, politician Yuri Mukhin was born in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine. As the author of widely discussed books and documentaries on the history of society and political issues, he has many followers and like-minded people both in Russia and in foreign countries.

perestroika

In the late 80s and until the mid-90s, he was the first to work at the Ermakov Ferroalloy Plant, where he proved to be a talented inventor, innovator and perfectly organized production. Yuri Mukhin was awarded the "Inventor of the USSR" badge for more than thirty introduced inventions, he published a number of scientific articles. His fundamentally new management concept, called "Delocracy", is considered among the organizers of production as very promising and promising.

And in 1995, this plant was sold to Japanese industrialists. Naturally, Yuri Mukhin conflicted with the new leadership and moved to the capital of Russia, where he became the founder of the Duel newspaper and was its permanent author until the moment when the newspaper ceased to exist (banned in 2009). After that, he worked as the editor-in-chief of the newspaper "To the Barrier!" (also prohibited). After 2010, the newspaper "In Their Own Names" was published.

Numerous articles in the magazine "Behind the Seven Seals" and in the newspaper "Tomorrow", which the publicist Yuri Mukhin offered to his reader, provided the author with both recognition and repression. But the series in the Eksmo publishing house, founded by him, enjoys the constant interest of both associates and opponents of the world that Yuri Mukhin sees and demonstrates in his works. His biography is rich.

Leader

He was the founder and head of the "Army of the Will of the People" - a social movement that was banned on the territory of our country in 2010. The organization came up with proposals for the adoption of laws that spelled out the direct responsibility of both the President and the Federal Assembly for the activities they conduct, that is, the direct responsibility of the current government to its people.

It would be logical, but not everyone thought so. Although representatives of this organization were delegated to the National Assembly of the Russian Federation, the "Army of the Will of the People" was recognized as extremist and banned (2010). Further Mukhin Yury Ignatievich headed another community - the Initiative Group for holding a referendum "ZOV" (For Responsible Power). As a result, on July 29, 2015, he was taken into custody. He was charged with continuing the activities of the AVN.

Defender

Yuri Mukhin represents Yevgeny Yakovlevich Dzhugashvili in courts, defending the honor and dignity of Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, Yevgeny's grandfather. And Yevgeny Yakovlevich himself is not so simple as to choose an unworthy person for such an important matter. Dzhugashvili - candidate of historical and military sciences, professor. He retired as a colonel in the Soviet Army. For twenty-five years he taught the history of wars and military art at the Voroshilov Military Academy, and also worked with S.P. Korolev, dealt with rockets and their carriers, launched them at Baikonur.



Writer Yuri Mukhin is not only a highly educated historian, but also a talented detective, he found many evidence. For example, that Joseph Stalin died with no assistance from a stroke, and Lavrenty Beria was simply shot dead, without waiting for a trial or investigation. In his writings, the author notes that this was the result of a conspiracy by Nikita Khrushchev himself and those closest to him.

Justice

In the book "The Murder of Stalin and Beria", the author Yuri Mukhin described in detail everything "dug up" in this case: that the so-called nomenklatura created in their own interests, but in fact the whole cult rested on the authority of the leader, deserved, by the way, both by mind and and diligence; that repressions really took place, although not to the extent that is imputed to Stalin after his death, and that these persecutions were absolutely justified.



Mukhin notes that Stalin gave the order to the Soviet troops on full readiness before the fascist attack quite on time - on June 18th - but the generals sabotaged him. Moreover, the historian Yuri Mukhin found evidence that Iosif Vissarionovich was preparing the Communist Party for removal from power, he wanted to turn it into a kind of public organization like a spiritual order with educational functions.

accusations

For public speaking with extremist appeals through the media, Yury Ignatievich Mukhin was convicted by the Moscow Court of the Savelovsky District. The crime provides for part 2 punishment in the form of two years in prison and a complete ban on working as editor-in-chief. The sentence was conditional. This is for work in the newspapers "Duel" and "To the Barrier!" (year 2009). Newspapers were banned, some books were included in the federal list of prohibited extremist materials, such as, for example, the repeatedly reprinted six hundred-page "brick" "It's a shame for the state."



Mukhin Yury Ignatievich (together with associates) was imprisoned on the same charge - for the continuation of the activities of the AVN group in the form of initiative groups regarding the holding of a referendum regarding the amendment of the current Constitution and the adoption of a new law, designated as "For responsible power". Investigators believe that the goal was criminal: rocking the political situation in the country, which could lead to instability and a change of power by illegal means. For now, the trial is underway. Yuri Mukhin (his photo is present in the article) is currently in prison.

Key Ideas

Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich criticizes in his works many generally accepted provisions - both historical and philosophical, and social. Most often it looks like an ideological reaction to some kind of social inequality, that is, quite often the concept of conspiracy theory is included.

For example, "Delocracy" - in defiance of the bureaucracy. Mukhin Yuri Ignatievich is sure that there should be no bosses over the performer, only the consumer correctly evaluates the work. The contract method is built on this principle - this is the option when powers are delegated. More about this in Mukhin's book "The Science of Managing People: A Presentation for Everyone", published by Folium in 1995 in Moscow.

About the war and the Poles

Yury Mukhin pays a lot of attention to the politics of Poland - both past and present. It is this country that he considers one of the main culprits at the beginning of the Second World War: the anti-Russian and aggressive policy is traditional for the governments of Poland, and at that moment, instigated by Great Britain, it played the role of a catalyst.



Yuri Mukhin is also sure that the captured Poles in Katyn were killed in 1941 by the Nazis. And he quite coherently proves this in his work "Katyn Detective". Also, many other refutations were made by Mukhin regarding established false opinions about the course of the first half of the Great Patriotic War.

Communications and personnel

One of the main troubles, due to which significant losses were made in the Red Army in the summer of forty-one, is poor communication. Mukhin thinks so (the Wehrmacht was strong in this respect). And the training of army personnel before the war was weak, which also significantly affected the number of initial defeats and increased losses until the very end of the war.

From the pleasant: Goebbels and the German aces pilots successfully falsified most of the victories, our pilots were many times better. Mukhin wrote the book "War and Us" about all this and much more.

The best books and films of Yuri Mukhin

1. Ed. 2014 Victims of Blitzkrieg - 320 pages of gripping exploration of this formidable strategy. The practice of "blitzkrieg" has been radically revised. Yuri Mukhin explains the phenomena of triumphs not by the strength of the aggressor's armies, but by the meanness or cowardice of the elites, and there were also frankly militarily weak countries.



For example, Poland had an army that was practically not inferior to the Wehrmacht, but "merged" after two weeks of the war. Weak Denmark lasted one day - why? The book is both interesting and bitter to read, especially the chapters concerning the reasons why the enemy captured half of the vast country. What should be done so that the forty-first year does not repeat itself? Yuri Mukhin knows the answer.

2. Ed. 2013 "General's mafia: from Kutuzov to Zhukov" - 352 pages about Russia's domestic wars - both the first, 1812, and the second, the Great War. It is considered the most controversial and sometimes "politically incorrect" of Yuri Mukhin's books, full of forbidden truth and refutation of historical myths. Without regard to censorship, untouchable pseudo-heroes are exposed, answers are given to the most uncomfortable questions.



Who jeopardized our troops near Borodino, destroying the army of Bagration? Why, "tell me, uncle," they surrendered Moscow to the French without any need? Who is to blame that Napoleon escaped Russian captivity? What do Kutuzov and Zhukov have in common? How to expose the general mafia, which replaces history with pure propaganda? Zhukov near Yelnya - a failure or a feat? And Kutuzov on the Berezina?

3. The film "Katyn meanness", 2005, 3 series. Very strong work. With facts against which there are no arguments. The film was created to draw attention to the blatant Red Army is advancing. 1943 Hitler needs the support of Europe, and for this you need to piss her off. Hence the order: to dig up the graves of 1941, where the Polish officers shot by the Germans never rested, and then to tell the world that near Smolensk the NKVD killer destroyed them back in 1940 on the orders of the "Moscow Jews".