Article by Ikonnikov V.A. very big. In fact, this is a scientific study of the "Secret Doctrine" for the presence of facts about the displacement of the earth's axis. Since no more reliable sources of Truth have yet been found, this study is of interest to me.

I moved the afterword to the preface, as I believe that these reflections affect the aspect of perception of the rest of the information.

Foreword: What, then, could not be said more in The Secret Doctrine?

A careful study and comparison of the astronomical facts scattered across the pages of The Secret Doctrine revealed an amazing picture of the mechanism of displacements of the earth's axis. Common features of this mechanism are revealed. Perhaps there are some of its features. In huge cycles, there are other cycles, and in those smaller ones, and their superposition on each other can create these features. One thing can be said - this mechanism exists.

Yes, in the astronomical aspect, enough has been said in the book. What has been a mystery for many centuries is given in this book almost openly. And to say more would mean to give a ready-made answer, which would also be casually and arrogantly discarded by official science.

It is impossible to invent this intentionally, and from a set of "astronomical fables" and "absurdities" it is impossible to create even the semblance of any scheme.

In defense of this priceless book, only one thing can be said - it contains real, true knowledge of the ancient History of the Earth and Humanity

In the Conclusion to the first part of the second volume of The Secret Doctrine, H.P. Blavatsky writes:

“Do the Masters have a complete and consistent history of our Race from its very inception to our times; whether they have an uninterrupted record of man, beginning with his development into a complete physical being, whereby he became king over animals and lord on this earth, it is not for the author to say. Undoubtedly, they have them and this is our personal conviction. But if this is so, then this knowledge is reserved only for the highest Initiates, who do not confide it to their disciples. Therefore, the author can only give what he was taught and no more, and even this will seem to the uninitiated reader more like a wild and fantastic dream than a possible reality.

This is only natural, and this is how it should be, for for several years this was the impression made on the modest writer of these pages. Born and raised in European materialistic and considered civilized countries, she learned the above with great difficulty. But there is a certain kind of evidence which, in the course of time, becomes irrefutable and undeniable to every serious and unprejudiced mind. For a whole series of years such proofs have been offered to her, and now she is fully convinced that our present Planet and its human Races must have been born, grow and develop precisely in this way and no other. (Vol. 2, p.547)

120 years have passed since then, but little has changed in the human mind. Brought up in a supermaterialistic world, the contemporary readers of The Secret Doctrine also seem to be "rather a wild and fantastic dream than a possible reality." And if the author of The Secret Doctrine "assimilated" the knowledge offered to her with great difficulty, then our contemporaries, including representatives of science, do not bother to seriously study the book in which this knowledge is reflected. And this knowledge is incomprehensible. A real scientist, free from prejudice, need only take one of the statements of The Secret Doctrine as the beginning of his research, and he may have enough work for the rest of his life. Moreover, its research will certainly be successful and useful to society, because. they will rely on a true foundation. The time will surely come when the attitude to this work will be just that.

In the meantime, it is proposed to consider some of the facts presented in the book and lying, one might say, almost on the surface.

So, at the end of the 2nd volume of The Secret Doctrine, after a description of one ancient astronomical position of the luminaries, there are these words: “Let the student exercise his intuition by comparing these facts; no more can be said” (Vol. 2, p. 993).

An intriguing statement. Why not? In this famous book, not in all cases ready-made answers are given. Blavatsky noted that there are no direct answers to some questions in this book, but there are hints in the form of separate facts scattered across the pages in no apparent sequence. This was done so that science itself would go to the answers, taking into account these hints in its research. Science, meanwhile, ignores this grandiose work, preferring to stay in a sea of ​​conflicting hypotheses.

Let's try to compare the astronomical facts scattered across the pages of this book and, arguing logically, we may get some kind of picture, and, consequently, an answer, about which more could not be said.

Let's start with the following passages from The Secret Doctrine:

“In fact, science does not seem to be sure about axis shifts at all. And, being unable to explain them, it is rather ready to deny the phenomena of axis shift altogether than to admit the wise hand of the Karmic Law, which alone can rationally explain these sudden changes and their attendant results. Science has tried to explain them by various and more or less fantastic theories; one of which ... would be a sudden collision of our Earth with a Comet, a collision that would be the cause of all geological perturbations. But we prefer to stick to our Esoteric explanations, in view of the fact that Fohat is worth any Comet and in addition has the Universal Mind as its Guide. (Volume 2 p.412)

It is stated that in the history of the Earth there have been sudden displacements of the earth's axis and that the force producing such displacements is Fohat.

"Whereas the Egyptian Zodiac retains incontrovertible evidence of records spanning more than three and a half Sidereal years - or about 87,000 years -...". (Volume 2, p.415)

“Occult data show that even from the time of the correct establishment of the Zodiac calculations in Egypt, the poles were moved three times"(Volume 2, p.443)

It is claimed that there have been three pole shifts in 87,000 years.

"Since the three inversions of the Poles have undoubtedly changed the face of the Zodiac, a new one must be built each time." (Vol. 2, p.545)

It is argued that the three pole movements mentioned above are three inversions, i.e. swapping poles.

“Since Meru is the high abode of the Gods, it was said that the Gods ascended And descended periodically; astronomically, these gods meant the Gods of the Zodiac, or the transition of the original north pole of the Earth to the south pole of Heaven. (Volume 2, p.448)

It is argued that the transitions of the north pole of the Earth to the south pole of Heaven, i.e. the permutations mentioned above occurred periodically.

From these fragments, we see that in the history of the Earth there have been sudden displacements of the earth's axis and that such displacements have occurred periodically. And that over a period of about 87 thousand years there were three of them and not just displacements, but “inversions”, i.e. permutations of the poles, when the north pole of the Earth passes to the south pole of the sky.

Let's imagine a scheme of a complete permutation of the poles (Fig. 1), where α is the angle between the Earth's axis and the axis of the ecliptic (or the axis of precession, which coincide in this position).

Fig.1

Here we see that the poles are reversed. But this movement is complex and for ease of understanding it can be represented as the sum of two simple movements: the 1st is the rotation of the axis along the generatrix of the cone by half a circle and the 2nd is the rotation by 180 0 relative to the plane of the ecliptic.

We do not yet know at one time or in stages such shifts occurred, and also what period of time this process took.

Let us assume that such revolutions took place at all. Let's just try to imagine what would change in the event of such a complete upheaval.

The inclination of the planet's axis of rotation to the plane of the ecliptic will remain the same, because only the geographic poles of the Earth have changed places. The appearance of the starry sky will change, i.e. instead of the northern constellations, the southern constellations will appear before the observer of the northern latitudes. The rotation of the Earth will remain the same, but the direction of rotation, relative to the visible stellar sphere, will be reversed and, therefore, the sunrise will occur from the west. All the rising constellations and the Moon will rise from the west.

In general, west and east are relative concepts, i.e. It is believed that the east is in the direction from which the sun rises. And in this book it is written that: “Even the terms “East” and “West” are simply conditional, necessary only as an aid to our human knowledge. For although the Earth has its two fixed points at the poles of North and South, yet East and West change according to our own position on the surface of the Earth and due to its rotation from west to east. (Vol. 1, p. 756)

Therefore, it is more correct to say that the Sun will rise where it previously set.

And we find confirmation of this in the following fragments of The Secret Doctrine:

“As Mr. Gerald Massey says, “.... The priests informed the Greek explorer that they had been counting time for so long that the sun had already risen twice where it then set, and twice set where it rose. This ... can be brought about, as a fact in Nature, by means of two cycles of Precessions, or a period of 51,736 years." (In the "Secret Doctrine" the precessional cycle is taken to be 25868 years - V.I.)(Vol. 1, p.537)

"It reminds me of unscientific now…". (Vol. 2, p.671)

What else will change? The annual movement of the Sun in the zodiac constellations will remain the same, because. the direction of the earth's revolution around the sun remains the same. The view of the equatorial and zodiac constellations will become inverted with respect to the observer and the order of the zodiac constellations along the ecliptic will be reversed with respect to their current location. For example, if now in the summer we observe Scorpio in the south, and Libra to the right, then in the case of a rearrangement of the poles, we will see Scorpio also in the south, but in winter and upside down, Libra will be to his left and also upside down.

It is interesting to note that the change of seasons of the year after the reversal of the poles will go in the opposite direction. It's like the northern and southern hemispheres suddenly changed places and, where they were preparing for winter, they would have to live another summer again, and another winter in the other hemisphere.

If the change of seasons went in the opposite direction, then this is evidence of a reverse movement of the equinoxes. In this case, the movement of the “top of the top” should also change to the opposite, i.e. the cone-shaped movement of the Earth's axis around the axis of precession, and, consequently, the movement of the points of the celestial poles relative to the starry sky. In other words, the celestial poles and equinox points ran over half the precessional circle. The spring equinox in this case will turn into autumn and go in the opposite direction, fulfilling the will of the law on the conservation of momentum, i.e. with its delay, restoring the half-lap run. Thus, the sun will annually not advance its arrival at the equinox by some fraction of the time (20 m 24 s at the present time), but lag by the same amount. And the term "precession", which means anticipation, will lose its meaning, since in this case there will be a delay.

Here, at first glance, are the main visible spatial changes that should occur as a result of such a revolution.

Physical changes on the surface of the planet as a result of such a revolution should be catastrophic in the form of a global flood due to the displacement of sea and ocean water masses.

And we find confirmation of this in the pages of The Secret Doctrine:

“According to Seneca, Beroz taught to prophesy about every future event and cataclysm in the Zodiac; and the times set by him for the destruction of the World by fire - Pralaya - and for the flood, correspond to the times given in one ancient Egyptian papyrus. A similar catastrophe occurs at each resumption of the cycle of the Star Year, calculated in 25,868 years. (Vol. 1, p. 814)

It is argued that catastrophes alternate every 25,868 years.

“The student should keep in mind that there were many Floods like the one in Genesis and three more, much more significant, which will be mentioned and described in the Section of the third part…”. (Vol. 2, p.384)

It is claimed that there were many floods.

And further: “This “Sea of ​​Knowledge” or learning remained for centuries where the Shamo or Gobi Desert now stretches. It existed until the last, great, ice age, when a local cataclysm, which carried the waters to the South and to the West, thus formed the current barren desert, leaving only one definite oasis with a lake and one island in the middle, like a relic or a Ring of the Zodiac on Earth. ". (Volume 2, p.631)

It is argued that the sea, which was previously in the Gobi desert, ceased to exist as a result of a cataclysm followed by the onset of the last ice age.

Very interesting in this regard is the information that can be found in the book "The Teaching of the Temple". This book (as the annotation says) is a continuation of the work begun by H. P. Blavatsky, and is the Instructions of the Masters of Wisdom. The instructions relate mainly to issues of spiritual development, but there are also those relating to cosmic and physical phenomena. So, in Instruction 38 (from Teacher M.) it says:

“In the Temple I mentioned, on one of the engraved tablets there is a record of the last movement of the earth's axis; and if its main cause was, in fact, the unworthily low mental energy generated by the races inhabiting the Earth at that time, then the very overthrow of the forces is due to the action of the beings of the higher race inhabiting the Sun. There, as elsewhere in the Universe, there is an eternal battle between Good and Evil, and at the time in question, there was a great battle between the Devas of the right and left paths for the right to possess and use certain powers and positions, allowing a significant degree of control solar system. Thanks to the huge armies of elemental forces released as a result of the imbalance on the Sun, significant changes occurred in the outlines of its surface (comparable to those that could occur with the earth's crust if a powerful explosion happened in its depths). This sudden release of uncontrollable elemental forces, in turn, upset the balance on the Earth, deviating its axis from its original position. There is a sphere or circuit of energy that connects the Sun to all the planets in the solar system, just as sound or light waves can connect two electrical communication nodes. It is through these means of communication that the conscious elemental force can reach and influence any planet in our system. Due to the deviation of the true pole, huge masses of water overflowed their banks and flooded the continents inhabited at that time. The imbalance in such a huge area of ​​​​the Sun also affected the thermal balance, lowering the thermal vibrations of the Earth, and soon after the Great Flood, the period known to us as the Ice Age began. ("The Teaching of the Temple". ICR. Master Bank. M. 2001. Vol. 1, p. 132 - 133)

In this Manual, the causes and forces that produced the last shift in the Earth's axis are given. It talks about the Flood as a consequence of the displacement and, very importantly, it talks about the Ice Age, which began shortly after the Flood. Above, we have already considered a fragment that speaks of the Gobi desert and the sea that existed "before the last, great, ice age."

The following fragment from The Secret Doctrine is very interesting on the same subject:

“The sub-races are just as subject to similar purifying processes as are the side branches or racial families of them. Let him who is well acquainted with astronomy and mathematics look back at the twilight and shadows of the Past. Let him observe and note what he knows about the history of peoples and nations, and compare their respective rises and falls with what is known as astronomical cycles - especially with the Sidereal (Sideral) Year, equal to our 25,868 solar years. Then, if the observer is endowed with even the faintest intuition, he will see how the happiness and misfortune of the peoples are closely connected with the beginning and end of this Sidereal Cycle. It is true that the non-occultist will be at a disadvantage, for he will not have data so remote in time to base on. He knows nothing, and exact science does not tell him what happened about 10,000 years ago; but still, he can take comfort in knowing some data or - if he prefers - in conjectures about the fate of each of the modern nations known to him - about 16,000 years ago. (or rather - after the lapse, see below - V.A.). The meaning of what we say is clear. Each Sidereal Year, the tropics recede from the pole by four degrees at each revolution, starting from the equinoxes as the equator rotates through the constellations of the Zodiac. So every astronomer knows that at present the tropic lies only twenty-three degrees plus (less than half a degree) from the equator. Therefore, he must run another two and a half degrees before the end of the Sidereal Year. This gives humanity in general, and our civilized races in particular, a delay of about 16,000 years." (Volume 2, pp. 413 - 414)

Here we see the statement that global catastrophic events take place every Star Year, and that the last such event occurred about 10,000 years ago. From all this it can be assumed that this was the last shift of the axis with a permutation of the poles and that after it the last Ice Age came. The next similar shift will occur in about 16,000 years (which adds up to a Star Year). You can specify the time of the last offset: 25868-16000 = about 9868 years ago.

But the same fragment speaks of a gradual displacement of the Earth's axis at a speed of 4 degrees per Sidereal Year. Maybe this is the only way to change the poles? Then it will take 180 0: 4 0 = 45 cycles, or 25868 x 45 = 1,164,060 years. Quite a long period. One could agree with this, if not for the following fragment:

We will divide this fragment into three astronomical facts:

1) “Aldebaran was in conjunction with the Sun, as it was 40,000 years ago at a great festival in memory of this Annus Magnus about which Plutarch speaks.

2) From this Year - 40,000 years ago - the reverse movement of the equator began

3) about 31,000 years ago, Aldebaran was in combination with the vernal equinox. (Vol. 2, p.992)

Let's consider the second one first. It is said unequivocally that 40,000 years ago the reverse movement of the equator began. Taking into account the above statement about the gradual displacement of the Earth's axis at a speed of 4 degrees per sidereal year, we will come to the conclusion that the movement of the equator should be understood as a change in the angle of inclination of the equatorial plane to the ecliptic plane with such a displacement. Therefore, until 40,000 years ago, this angle increased, and then began to decrease for some reason, which is happening now.

If you try to imagine the reason, then an analogy with a top arises, the axis of which, with a decrease in the speed of rotation, begins to sway more and more until it collapses on its side. But if the spinning top is added in time to the speed of rotation, it will level out, and its axis will again assume a vertical position.

We will not discuss what forces gave the planet an impulse to accelerate rotation, since this is a separate and, probably, an extensive topic, especially since there is very little information about this in this book. So on its pages it is written: “It seems to me that the Comte de Maistre was right in solving this problem, following his own theological ideas. He cuts the Gordian knot, saying: “Planets turn because they are made to turn…. and the current physical system of the universe is a physical impossibility.” Didn't Herschel say the same thing, noting that a Will is needed to communicate a circular motion and another Will to delay it.

And here: "Starting from Newton, who finds that this world is very often in need of repair, to Reynaud, everyone says the same thing," etc. (Vol. 1, p.626)

It is given to understand that there are higher forces that support the planets in their movement, i.e. it is Fohat, mentioned above, who has the Universal Mind as its Guide.

The fact that the Earth previously rotated more slowly is confirmed by the following fragment:

"A man of great erudition, French scientist Mr. De Sacy finds in the book of Enoch some very strange claims “worthy of the most serious investigation,” he says. For example:

“The author [Enoch] states 364 days in the solar year, and seems to know periods of three, five, and eight years, followed by four additional days; apparently the latter in his system refer to the equinoxes and solstices”

He further adds:

“I see only one way to explain them [these 'absurdities']; namely, to assume that the author is expounding some fantastic system that could exist until the time when the Flood changed the order of Nature”

Exactly; and the Secret Doctrine teaches that "this order of Nature" has been so changed, as well as successive terrestrial mankind." (Vol. 2, p.670)

It seems that our Earth in the remote period has gradually reduced the speed of its rotation to some critical and possibly dangerous value. But then, having received an impulse to accelerate rotation, it began to gain momentum. And 40,000 years ago, the Earth's axis moved in the opposite direction, towards approaching the axis of the ecliptic.

The question may arise, was the tilt of the axis dangerous or could the Earth gradually roll, calmly “lie on its side” and rotate, having its axis in the plane of the ecliptic?

On this account, the Secret Doctrine contains the following lines: “This confirms the occult teaching, which says that what is now the polar regions were originally the earliest cradles of the seven cradles of Humanity and the tomb of the majority of Humanity in this region during the Third Race, when the giant Continent of Lemuria began to dissect into smaller continents. According to the explanation in the Commentaries, this happened due to a decrease in the speed of the earth's rotation; ” When the Wheel rotates at normal speed, its extreme points (poles) are consistent with its middle Circle (Equator), but when it rotates more slowly and oscillates in all directions, great upheavals occur on the surface of the Earth."…" etc. (Volume 2, p.406)

It can be seen that such periods are accompanied by catastrophes and are dangerous in the life of the planet. Hence the great feast in memory of this Annus Magnus when the equator moved in the opposite direction.

This movement is called a cycle: "The returns of the great catastrophes were determined by the period Annus Magnus or a great year, a cycle consisting of the revolution of the sun, moon and planets, and ending when they all return to the same sign from which they are supposed to have come out at a very distant epoch ... ". (Vol. 2, p. 991) therefore, it is periodic and the permutations of the poles as a result of a gradual 4-degree shift of the earth's axis in the Star Year could not be carried out. In fact, this is a swing of the planet's axis from the axis of the ecliptic, or rather, from the axis of precession, within 0 0 - 30 0 - 0 0 for a full period of more than 400,000 years.

And this movement (shaking of the axis) is confirmed in the book by the following statement: “Nevertheless, 70,000 years have passed since the Pole of the Earth began to point to the far end of the tail of Ursa Minor;... "(Volume 2, p. 970).

That is, it is argued that 70,000 years ago, the end of the earth's axis pointed to the alpha of Ursa Minor. But if we start counting back this period in the generally accepted way, making the construction of the pole on the star map (taking into account the 4-degree axis shift), then such a statement will look like astronomical absurdity, because. we won't find it anywhere near. But if we take into account the reverse movement of the equator mentioned above, then we can make sure that the trajectory of the pole point 70,000 years ago could well pass near the alpha of Ursa Minor. This is an important confirmation of the reverse movement of the equator.

Thus, the spiral described by the pole point in the starry sky, which had previously been expanding, having reached its maximum position 40,000 years ago, began to narrow, and this narrowing continues in our time.

All this suggests that there may be another mechanism for the reversal of the poles. After all, there were rearrangements, and this is said on the pages of The Secret Doctrine.

Let's go back to an event that took place about 10,000 years ago and determine in which zodiac constellation the precessional point of the vernal equinox was at that moment. This is easy to determine, starting from the first degree of Aquarius, where she is now and given that she passes each sign of the Zodiac in 2155.6 years. Simple arithmetic calculations give us the middle of Cancer. This means that on the diameter of Cancer - Capricorn, at the opposite ends of which the spring and autumn equinoxes are located, periodically, every 25,868 years, the earth's axis should shift with a rearrangement of the poles. We have already noted above that in the event of such a reversal, the equinox point will go in the opposite direction. Is it so?

Let us fully consider the fragment, divided by us into three astronomical facts, i.e. Let's look at the other two. They state that - 1) "Aldebaran was in combination with the Sun, as it was 40,000 years ago ....", i.e. was at the equinox or at the solstice.

And after 9000 years, he - 3) "... about 31,000 years ago, Aldebaran was in combination with the vernal equinox." How can it be? For the vernal equinox point, the period of 9000 years to return to the previous position is clearly small (a full circle of 25868 years is needed). For the solstice point, it is clearly large (a quarter of a circle is needed in 6467 years). For the opposite point of the autumn equinox, this period will be half a circle of 12,934 years. All these terms are given without taking into account the axis shift.

Let's take into account the revolution of the planet. Having made simple calculations, we will find that it was the autumn equinox that went from Aldebaran (Taurus) to the middle of Cancer and spent about 4500 years on it. Then, after the coup about 35,736 (9868+25868=35736) years ago, becoming a spring point, it moved in the opposite direction and was on its way to Aldebaran for the same amount of time. In total, 9000 years were spent on the whole journey. This is the only way to explain these 9000 years. This is an important argument in confirming the reversal of the poles and the fact that in this case the equinox will go in the opposite direction.

Thus, the equinox did not cross Cancer, but, having reached approximately the middle, after the axis shift, it went in the opposite direction again to Gemini and from that moment became precessional, i.e. the preceding, and not the lagging point of the equinox, as it was before. It turns out that Cancer never crosses this point, because. the inversion occurs every Sidereal Year and therefore the beginning and end of this cycle lies in the middle of Cancer. And then the hidden meaning (in the astronomical aspect) of the astrological symbol of Cancer becomes clear (Fig. 2). It can be called a sign in which a permutation of the poles occurs and in which a reverse occurs, i.e. backward movement of the equinox point in the Zodiac Circle.

Rice. 2 Astrological symbol of Cancer

The very symbol of the zodiac animal Cancer also speaks eloquently for itself - "cancer moves back." The Egyptian analogue of Cancer - the Scarab - emphasizes this feature even more clearly - it, moving backwards, rolls a ball of dung. An amazingly accurate symbol in an astronomical aspect, you can’t think of more precisely!

“When was it? History does not answer this question. Fortunately, we have the Dendera Zodiac, a planisphere on the ceiling of one of the oldest Egyptian temples, which depicts this fact. This Zodiac, with its mysterious three Virgos between the constellations Leo and Libra, found its Oedipus in order to decipher its signs and justify the veracity of those priests who conveyed to Herodotus what the Initiates taught, (but) that the poles of the Earth and the Ecliptic previously coincided and (b) that, even since the beginning of their first records of the Zodiac, the poles have already been three times in the plane of the ecliptic. (Volume 2, p.462)

Item (but) it is clear that this was once the case (the axis of the ecliptic and the axis of the Earth were parallel) and will be again in the distant future when the middle of the cycle is reached Annus Magnus. And here is the point (b) arouses some interest. It says that the axis of the Earth was three times in the plane of the ecliptic during the period of the existence of the Egyptian Zodiac (about 87,000 last years). It did not pass through the plane of the ecliptic during the displacements, but was located in it.

It is also said in another place that: “This reminds unscientific the statement made by the Egyptian priests to Herodotus, namely, that the Sun did not always rise where it rises now and that in former ages the ecliptic crossed the equator at right angles. (Vol. 2, p. 671) where the expression "... the ecliptic crossed the equator at right angles" means the same, i.e. the axis of the Earth was in the plane of the ecliptic i.e. silt on this ka equinox and in the way of the period of power.

This position of the earth's axis is described in the following fragments of The Secret Doctrine:

“For in that age when the Gods left the Earth and, as it is said, ascended into Heaven, the ecliptic became parallel with the meridian, and part of the Zodiac, as it were, descended from the North Pole to the northern horizon.”

And further: “Now when Leo is in the “Abyss” or under the South Pole, then Virgo, as the next constellation, follows him and when her head, to the very waist, is under the Southern horizon, she is overturned. On the other hand, Hyades is the constellation of rain or the Flood; and Aldebaran is one who follows or inherits daughters of Atlas or Pleiades, looks down from the eye of Taurus. It was from this point of the Ecliptic that the calculations of the new cycle began. The student must remember that when Ganymede-Aquarius is raised to Heaven-or above the horizon of the North Pole, Virgo or Astrea, which is Venus-Lucifer, descends head down below the horizon of the South Pole or Abyss. This abyss or Pole also depicts the Great Dragon or the Flood. Let the student exercise his intuition by putting these facts together; can't say more ( I emphasized - V.I. These words are taken from the beginning of the article.)". (Vol. 2, pp. 992-993)

This position is possible on the day of the equinox, when the Earth's axis is located in the plane of the ecliptic. With this arrangement of the axis, the entire belt of the Zodiac should run from north to south. And if the precession point of the equinox is in combination with Aldebaran, then indeed the point of the north pole will be in Aquarius, and the south - in Leo. The constellation Virgo (head down) will be half hidden behind the southern horizon for an observer of the middle latitudes of the northern hemisphere (about 30 0 N).

These statements suggest that the displacement of the axis with the rearrangement of the poles did not occur at one time, but in stages. Let us follow this step-by-step shift with the help of constructions. So, we see the position before the displacement in the figure (Fig. 3).

Rice. 3

Here α is the angle between the Earth's axis and the axis of the ecliptic (or the axis of the precessional cone, which is the same, since they coincide in this position) before the displacement.

Since the precession cone must be preserved for any displacement, it is easier for us to imagine the displacement of the axis of this cone, or, in other words, the axis of precession. Then the first stage of the shift can be represented as a shift of the precession axis to its position in the ecliptic plane, i.e. rotate it 90 0 . (Fig. 4).

Rice. 4

Why exactly at 90 0? We now know that the reversal of the poles occurs when the vernal equinox reaches the middle of Cancer. And from the middle of Cancer to Aldebaran, as we have already calculated, it takes about 4500 years. Consequently, only after this time the earth's axis will be located in the plane of the ecliptic. Here we see that the earth's axis has yet to undergo a precessional shift to the plane of the ecliptic, and the point of the celestial pole must move from point "a" to point "b". So it turns out that the precession axis should be approximately in the plane of the ecliptic, and this is 90 0 .

The amazing position of the Earth, when the inclination of the earth's axis to the plane of the ecliptic was about 25 0 (instead of today's 63.5 0), and it constantly decreased over 4500 years to 0 0 . This situation was supposed to lead to cardinal climate change. There is an excerpt in this book:

“Cosmically and astronomically, this Hyperborean God is the personified Sun, which, during the sidereal Year of 25868 years, changes the climates on the earth's surface, turning the freezing regions into tropical and back". (Vol. 2, p. 972)

Rice. five

And now the Earth's axis is in the plane of the ecliptic (Fig. 5). This means that there were periods in these displacement processes when the Earth really “lay on its side”. The scheme of this position refers to the above fragment, which says: “... and Aldebaran is the one who follows or inherits daughters of Atlas or Pleiades, looks down from the eye of Taurus. In other words, the vernal equinox came in conjunction with Aldebaran Taurus. And in time, this position refers to the period after the next shift of the axis with a rearrangement of the poles, which occurred about 35,736 years ago (i.e., 9868 years ago, as we specified, the last shift of the axis occurred, plus one more Star Year, which gives date of previous offset). To find out when the Earth's axis reached a position in the ecliptic plane, we subtract 4500 years from 35,736 years ago and get this date, i.e. about 31,236 years ago. But here in one fragment from the first volume of the book it says:

“So we are told that the majestic Pyramids were built under their direct supervision, “when Dhruva (then the pole star) was at its lowest climax, Krittika (Pleiades) looked over her head (were on the same meridian, only above) and observed behind the work of the Giants. Thus, if the first pyramids were erected at the beginning of the Star Year under Dhruva (Alpha Polaris), then, therefore, it must have been more than 31,000 (31,105) ago” (Vol. 1, p. 537).

We will not find out when the first pyramids of Egypt were built, but the meaning of this statement is that they were erected earlier by a whole sidereal year or more.

For our research, it is important to indicate the exact date of the beginning of the Star Year - this is 31105 years ago from the year the book was written (1888). “It was from this point on the Ecliptic that the calculations of the new cycle began” was said in the earlier fragment describing the position when the Earth's axis was still in the plane of the ecliptic. This is close to the date we obtained for the location of the Earth's axis in the plane of the ecliptic - about 31,236 years ago. But here we are already talking about the polar star Dhruva. Dhruva is the alpha of Ursa Minor and a reference to this can be found in the book:

“... The fact is that the rays of the four stars “in the circle of constant appearance” - Agni, Mahendra, Kasheyapa and Dhruva, placed in the tail of Ursa Minor (Shisumara) ... "etc. (Volume 2, p.770.

Then the date 31,105 ago can be taken as the year the Earth's axis left the plane of the ecliptic. So, the second stage of the displacement ended with another rotation of the precession axis again by 90 0, as a result of which the point of the south pole from the middle of Leo (the point of the north pole was in Aquarius) traveled to the alpha of Ursa Minor and this ended the permutation of the poles (Fig. 6). The whole rearrangement process took approximately: 35736 - 31105 = 4631 years.

Rice. 6

That Alpha Ursa Minor became at this time the polar star of the south pole should be clear from the order of permutations of the poles described above. That is, in the period from 9868 years ago to 35,736 years ago, Alpha Ursa Minor was the star of the southern sky, and from 35,736 years ago to 61,736 years ago, it was the star of the northern sky, etc. every stellar year. The concepts of the southern and northern sky are relative here and become so depending on which Pole of the Earth faces this sky.

It is possible that this process ended again with the flood, because it is said: "... On the other hand, the Hyades are the constellation of rain or the Flood." The Hyades is the central group of stars in the constellation Taurus.

But if the first catastrophic stage of the displacement occurred in Cancer, why is the beginning of the cycle of the Star Year taken from Taurus? There are words on this subject in the book about putting the house in order:

"Such selection and displacement does not occur between sunrise and sunset, as one might think, but it takes several millennia until the new house is put in order." (Vol. 2, p. 413) And this “putting the house in order” continued from the first stage of the displacement until its end, i.e. around 4631.

So, the beginning of a new cycle is taken as the position that ends the permutation of the poles. This is what the era of Taurus is marked in the traditions of many peoples!

"The role ascribed to the constellation Taurus is too well known even in Christian mysticism to need repetition" (Vol. 2, p. 992) - a remark is made in the book.

During this time (about 4631 years), " while the new house is being put in order”, many changes were to take place on the surface of the planet and with the humanity inhabiting this planet.

The Secret Doctrine says: "Sub-races are just as subject to similar purifying processes, as are side branches or racial families of them." (Volume 2, p.413)

And further: “... each kindred race has an average existence of about 30,000 years and, thus, the European “kindred race” has enough millennia ahead, although peoples or countless needles on it (in the diagram in the form of a cactus tree - V.I.) change with each successive "season" of three or four thousand years. It is very curious to note the comparative approximation in duration between the lives of the 'racial family' and the Star Year. (Vol. 2, p. 544)

As we can see, the European “kindred race”, i.e. our white race has enough millennia ahead, i.e. about 16,000 years before the next catastrophe associated with a shift in the axis with a rearrangement of the poles. Consequently, it originated about 10,000 (9868) years ago after the first stage of the earth's axis displacement during the Ice Age.

The Ice Age and the simultaneous position of the Earth, when its axis was close to the plane of the ecliptic, look somehow unexpected. But it turns out that this is exactly what happened during the last displacement of the earth's axis. Whether there were such cold snaps during previous pole shifts is unknown and nothing is said about this in the book. But the last Great Ice Age is mentioned in The Secret Doctrine as an event about 10,000 years ago. The above-mentioned Instruction from the Teachings of the Temple also says: “... The imbalance in such a huge area of ​​​​the Sun also affected the thermal balance, lowering the thermal vibrations of the Earth, and soon after the Great Flood, the period known to us as the Ice Age began.” It is impossible to fully imagine what happened on the Sun. One can only assume that his disk was almost completely covered with spots. And the legends of some peoples about the Flood become clear when they say that "the sky changed and the sun darkened." The fact that the sky had changed could be understood, because. completely unfamiliar constellations appeared before the eyes of people. Now it becomes clear that the sun has darkened. It darkened in the truest sense of the word, and not from the ashes of volcanoes and the smoke of fires, as some hypotheses seem to suggest. Obviously, the conditions of glaciation in this case differ sharply from the conditions if glaciation occurred in the current position of the earth's axis or close to it. This, of course, is interesting, but a separate topic for specialists in this field.

How long the Ice Age lasted and when it ended is not stated in the book. It is possible that the ice melted even before the position of the axis in the plane of the ecliptic. One thing is clear that the climate on Earth during this time has been transformed in the most fundamental way.

The following question arises, in what direction immediately after the end of the last revolution (which began about 9868 years ago) did the northern end of the earth's axis begin to point? Now this can be determined with certainty. We already know that the process of reversing the poles takes about 4631 years. So, it ended 9868 - 4631=5237 years ago. Counting back from the alpha of Ursa Minor, where the point of the northern celestial pole is now located, the distance corresponding to this date, we will find that the northern end of the earth's axis immediately after leaving the plane of the ecliptic began to point towards the alpha of the Dragon.

That's when the Egyptian priests were able to mark the position of the North Pole in Draconis alpha! And, of course, it was the age of Taurus.

So, the mechanism of displacements of the earth's axis with permutations of the poles is quite clearly revealed. But there remains some discrepancy with the movement of the precessional equinox point. What is it expressed in?

The fact is that after the rearrangement of the poles, the equinox point must go in the opposite direction. We have established that about 10,000 (9868) years ago there was a last reversal in the middle of Cancer, and the equinox is currently in the first degrees of Aquarius, therefore, after the reversal, it went towards Gemini, Taurus, etc. (on the eve of the coup, she walked from Gemini towards Cancer). But above we analyzed the fragment, when 40,000 years ago the point was in Aldebaran and after 9000 years it was again in Aldebaran, therefore, it also went from Cancer towards Taurus. But this was a previous coup, when, following the logic, the point in Cancer before the coup should have come from the side of Leo, and not from Aldebaran, i.e. Taurus?! And on the way back, she should have gone towards Leo, so that after 25,868 years she would enter Cancer from the side of Gemini. But it wasn't. 31105 years ago she was in Taurus. Does it go in the same direction every 25868 years after the next revolution - towards Taurus!? Unclear. It seems that some link is missing in this mechanism.

But in the book, a seemingly unremarkable (in the sense of “astronomical absurdity” or strangeness) fragment is found, where the coordinates of the last dead island of Atlantis are discussed and that the ancient Indians knew this island even before its death. The given astronomical fragment was given to help determine the coordinates. On a superficial reading, the reader, carried away by the proposed task, quite easily determines that this is the area of ​​\u200b\u200btoday's Canary Islands and, satisfied, moves on further through the pages of the book. But the main meaning of this fragment remains hidden and not understood.

Here is the snippet:

“So, we will consider the latitude and longitude of the lost island and the remaining Mount Asburj. It was in the seventh degree of the world, that is, in the seventh climate [which is between 24 0 and 28 0 N]….. This island, the daughter of the ocean, is often described as lying in the West; and the Sun is depicted as setting at the foot of his mountain [Asbourg, Atlas, Tenerife or Nile, the name does not matter] and fighting the White Devil from the "White Isle"...... Let us return again to the astronomical evidence, which fully explains this issue, if we agree with the mentioned Adept that:

"In an epoch when the summer 'colourium' of the tropics passed through the Pleiades, when the Heart of the Lion was at the equator, and when the Leo was at sunset in a vertical position with respect to Ceylon, then Taurus at noon stood vertically over the island of Atlantis."….. But, as proven in McKay's Sphinxiad, astronomically this must have happened about 23,000 years ago; in an era when the slope of the ecliptic should have been over 27 0 and, therefore, the constellation Taurus should have passed over Atlantis or Shankha-Dvipa. (Vol. 2, pp. 510-511)

Here the latitude of the location of the lost island of Atlantis is clearly indicated ( between 24 0 and 28 0 north latitude) and Mount Tenerife (an extinct volcano on the island of Tenerife in the Canary Islands) is mentioned. It remains to find out the longitude, which can be determined, knowing that the angle between Leo and Taurus is 90 0. Therefore, counting 90 degrees west of Ceylon, we determine this longitude, which is the longitude of the Canary Islands.

But if you make the construction of the indicated constellations (on the indicated date 23,000 years ago, when the vernal equinox was in Capricorn) so that the gamma of Leo is on the equator, then, to put it mildly, this will not correspond to the above statements. (Fig.7)

Rice. 7

The fact is that the island of Ceylon lies entirely in the northern hemisphere (middle And his company is 7 0 s.sh.) and Leo cannot be upright in relation to Ceylon, because it is all located south of the celestial equator, and only its head will be north. It can also be seen that Taurus (Aldebaran with the Hyades) is also located much further south than required in this fragment. This suggests that the constellations were inverted at that time, i.e. the poles were reversed from today's position. We have already established above that in the period from 35,736 years ago to about 10,000 (9868) years ago, the poles were in the opposite position, and it is this fragment that confirms this position of the earth's axis, and affirms it in a purely astronomical way. Let's bring the diagram in line with the position of the earth's axis at that time. It will look like this: (Fig.8)

Rice. 8

Yes, now Leo can be at its zenith over Ceylon! But Taurus ended up on the other side of the celestial equator next to the winter tropic, and not the summer tropic, as the fragment suggests.

And here it is necessary to pay attention to the words that " astronomically it must have happened about 23,000 years ago.” And what should have happened when it was about the coordinates of the island and nothing more? So something happened and astronomically. Note also that Leo "at sunset" was in a vertical position in relation to Ceylon, and Taurus "at noon" stood vertically above the island of Atlantis. This is nothing but two positions of the luminaries, separated by some event. This event happened about 23,000 years ago. Whether to read literally "at sunset" and "at noon" or to assume a longer period between them - in principle, does not change the matter. In these four lines of the "mentioned Adept" an event of a planetary scale is hidden, namely: another displacement of the earth's axis, but without rearranging the poles and maintaining the same angle of inclination of the axis. This is a circular displacement of the end of the earth's axis along the generatrix of the precessional cone by 180 0 . In this case, the celestial plus point will move from position “1” to position “2” (Fig. 9).

Rice. nine

Why exactly at 180 0 ? Because in this case, spring will definitely change into autumn. Consequently, the spring equinox will turn into autumn and go in the opposite direction, fulfilling the will of the law on the conservation of momentum, i.e. with its delay, restoring the half-lap run. And now it will not precede the moment of the spring equinox, but annually delay the moment of the autumn equinox for some fraction of the time. As you can see, the same thing happens in the displacement of the axis with the permutation of the poles. But there it is part of the displacement process - here it is limited to this.

Literature:

1. Blavatsky E.P. Secret Doctrine. Minsk "Lotats", 1997. Vol. 1-2.

2. "The Teaching of the Temple." ICR. Master Bank. M. 2001. T. 1

3. Blavatsky E.P.. "Isis Unveiled", M. EKSMO, 2002. p.102

Instead of an afterword.

This study was carried out after another study on the ancient Zodiac of Ak-Baur / *, and then on the Zodiac in Roerich's painting, unanswered questions arose without involving the hypothesis of the displacement of the earth's axis.

For the time being, I address this article simply to my like-minded people and friends who study the "Secret Doctrine" of H. P. Blavatsky.

The topic of shifting the axis of rotation of the Earth has been discussed on the Internet for several years - from the time when some people who have long lived in the same place began to note that the Sun rises and sets not where it has always been in the corresponding period.

When people try to discuss this phenomenon, there are always crowds of trolls and ordinary brainless people howling at them, starting to bend about refraction-diffraction and so on. However, let's get down to the facts. Alaska is home to a tribe of local Aborigines who call themselves the Inuk or Inuit.

The words "eater of raw meat" sound like "Eskimo" in their language, which gave another name to the tribe. Living in the extreme north and not having newfangled satellite devices, the Inuit have been carefully observing the Sun and stars for centuries, have their own unshakable calendars of all all seasonal phenomena. But since the early 2000s, these calendars have been greatly shaken, which the elders even tried to inform NASA.

According to their observations, the Sun rises and sets NOT THERE and NOT THEN. The Inuit, who had some knowledge of conventional astronomy, suggested that since the Earth is round and rotates, then the axis of rotation must have changed if the Sun does not rise over the hill over which it has risen for centuries on this day. Enlightened adepts from NASA made the ignorant Indian guys laugh and the topic was hushed up. But.

Hal Turner, founder of US government shut down opposition superstation95 with 2,000,000 listeners and readers a day:

Most likely I will be told again today that I need to wear a tinfoil hat, however, I can not help but note: the Sun still sets far north than before. I live at North Bergen, NJ 07047. My home is on the western slope of the Palisades, 212 feet above sea level. When I first moved here in 1991, I lived on the top (third) floor, with a terrace facing west.

On this terrace I enjoyed a beautiful sunset. Early in the summer, I noticed that the sun was right in the middle of its natural fall on a crest, perhaps 7 miles west of me, near Clifton, New Jersey. Tonight I watered the flowers on the terrace. I turned to look to the west, expecting to see the sunset, the sun over the ridge and all.

Imagine my surprise when I discovered a natural dip in the ridge line about 7 miles to the west. There was no sun! It didn't set there! I even had to turn my head a little more to the right to make sure that the Sun was there. It really was in the sky, but not in the West, but in the Northwest. I was so blown away by this change that I immediately ran to get my Apple iPhone and clicked on a lot of photos:

I am not an enlightened academic adept or some other famous space diver. I am an ordinary American guy who has lived at the same address for the past twenty-six years. The sun sets below the horizon definitely not where it should. It is located much further to the right (to the north) than before. Maybe,

The earth has changed its tilt on its axis. Perhaps the continent moves and rotates. I do not know. However, the guys from NASA are definitely in the know. Why don't they tell people about all this?!

Now the Skeptic will rush in and begin to teach us science) I have never lived in one place for a long time, and it is difficult to judge this. But here are some comments from the net:

"It's like someone moved our office. About 8 years ago, on the balcony of the office (11th floor), I struck a scratch with a nail corresponding to the edge of the shadow from the wall at 15 o'clock (tea time). Now this chira corresponds to 14-45. Paradox!"

“He didn’t lie. Recently, my wife called me to watch the sunset. I told her that this is not a sunset, the sunset happens in the west, but this is not the west. She even photographed this sunset on a smartphone. But it definitely was not in the west.”

“You can laugh, but this morning, I went for a walk with the dog at 4 in the morning and the shop where I have been sitting in the shade in the summer for more than a year turned out to be on the sunny side. I do not state anything, but the article confirmed my suspicions that this was not the delirium of a sleepy person. "

“I don’t know if the sun or the earth moved, but I actually transferred the seedlings from one loggia to another, because in the afternoon the sun began to illuminate the other side of the house ... In short, it moved thirty degrees .. And in the evening it shines through the northern window. But no one says anything about this, so I decided that it seemed.

“I usually sit on the Internet at night, in the summer in the spring I catch the dawn. I used to correct the curtain so that the sun would not hit the screen. Now it’s been two years now, it’s shining on a different line. The sun used to set behind the neighboring house in winter, now it jumps over it and hides behind other buildings. so the dude writes everything correctly and you don’t have delusions or false memories at all. a lot of people note about the Sun. it also changed its color. before it was orange, now it’s some kind of blue"

From the book of Simonov V.A. "The Prophecies of the Book of the Sibyls". From "Ves", 2012

According to the predictions of Nostradamus, the shift of the Earth's axis of rotation should be expected in the month of October: “Before this, there will be a solar eclipse, the darkest and gloomiest from the creation of the world to the death and passion of Jesus Christ and from that moment to the present. And in the month of October, it will happen that some great movement will happen - such that they will think that the colossus of the Earth has lost its natural direction and plunged into eternal darkness ”(“ Message to Henry II »).

Prophecy Sibyl of Eritrea about the displacement of the Earth's axis of rotation relative to the plane of the ecliptic:

Do not be arrogant, Indians and the brave people of the Ethiopians!

For when the wheel of the celestial axis, Capricorn

The stars, Taurus, will run around the center in the constellation of Brothers -

Virgo, ascending into the sky, and the Sun, spinning continuously,

Their round dance will be led throughout the firmament of heaven -

There will be a terrible fire that will cover the whole earth,

In the battle of the heavenly bodies, nature will be renewed, perish,

We cry the world announcing, the country of Ethiopians is on fire!

Canto 5, 206-213.

Celestial Axis Wheel - the ancient Greeks had the concept of the existence of an invisible axis that permeates our planet like the axis of a wheel. On the rim of this wheel are 12 zodiac constellations.

Constellation Brothers - the constellation Gemini. The current geographic north pole ( wheel axle) is directed to the North Star, which is located in the constellation Ursa Minor. The Sibyl predicts that as a result of a terrible cataclysm, the earth's axis will shift into the constellation Gemini, that is, approximately 60 degrees from its current position. The consequences of such a displacement, if it happens quickly enough, will be the most catastrophic.

Leonardo da Vinci warned of a shift in the axis of rotation of the Earth, which will occur in the future:
866. It will be seen how they turn the earth upside down and look at the opposite hemispheres and open the holes of the most ferocious animals (displacement of the Earth's axis of rotation andactivation of volcanoes).

1004. At each point on the earth it is possible to draw the boundary of two hemispheres. All people will immediately exchange hemispheres ( planetary pole shift 180 degrees?).

Edgar Cayce(1877 - 1945) - famous American clairvoyant and healer about the displacement of the Earth's axis of rotation:“The following changes in the physical appearance of the planet will take place: the territory of the western part of America will be split; most of Japan will go under water; in the twinkling of an eye the northern part of Europe will change; land will appear off the east coast of America.

In the Arctic and Antarctic there will be shifts in the earth's crust, which will lead to volcanic eruptions in the tropical zone. Then the shift [position] of the poles will follow, and as a result, the polar or subtropical zones can become tropics ... ".

Ruth Montgomery- former journalist, nowa spiritualist who predicts the future with the help of "spiritual guides" writes about the upcoming shift of the planet's poles:“At the beginning of the next century, the poles of the Earth will change their position. Furious and incredible in strength, hurricanes will sweep away everything in their path. New York will disappear. Florida will hardly survive. The southern states overlooking the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico, including Texas, will change beyond recognition. To the west, the remnants of California will disappear into the boiling sea."
“Because of the tidal waves caused by the displacement of the earth's axis, almost no part of the sea coasts can be considered safe; the low-lying regions of Europe are at risk, but the larger inland land masses such as Canada, Russia, Africa and China will be comparatively safe.”

“It is, of course, impossible to accurately determine the angle of displacement, but, as we have already stated, one pole will be in the Pacific Ocean, and the other somewhere in the southern part of South America .... Many people will not survive this displacement, although there will be enough of those who survive. This will happen for the reason that after a period of foaming seas and terrifying hurricane winds, the disorderly rampage will cease. Those who used to live in the tropics will find themselves in the north, and vice versa - the inhabitants of cold countries will find themselves in the south.

Shortly before the actual movement of the poles, two special events will occur. Ancient volcanic eruptions in the Mediterranean islands, South America, and California will cause epidemics, and shortly thereafter, massive tsunamis of hitherto unknown magnitude will form as a result of powerful aftershocks affecting northern Europe, Asia, and South America.

People who have lived in one place for a long time, dozens of years, began to notice that the Sun is now setting and rising in a completely different place from where it rose and set 20 or 40 years ago. A natural question arises - why?

Let's turn to the scientific information regarding the angle of inclination of the Earth's axis of rotation:

The angle of inclination of the Earth's axis with respect to the plane of the ecliptic is 23.5 degrees. This was the reason for the change of seasons on Earth, as a result of rotation around the Sun.

Effects of the Earth's tilt and movement around the Sun

Graphical depiction of the tilt of the Earth

With a frequency of 41 thousand years, the angle of inclination of the earth's axis changes from 22.1 to 24.5 degrees. The direction of the earth's axis also changes with a period of 26 thousand years. During this cycle, the poles change places every 13 thousand years.

All planets in the solar system have a certain angle of inclination of the axis. Mars has a tilt angle very similar to that of the Earth, at 25.2 degrees, while Uranus, on the contrary, is 97.8 degrees.

Great, science describes everything in detail to us, but these data do not change for decades, and the tilt of the Earth's axis is changing. The sun rises and sets in a completely different place, and in addition, global climate change may not be associated with the notorious human impact on nature, but with a change in the tilt of the Earth, as a result of which the climate has changed, moreover, all natural anomalies point precisely to this factor.

Why is this happening? There is only one answer - some huge cosmic body entered the solar system and has a powerful gravitational effect on our planet, it is so strong that it has already changed the axis of rotation of the Earth.

Scientists cannot but know, cannot but record such changes in the tilt of the earth's axis, but for some reason they are in no hurry to change the information, correct the data on the angle of inclination, and even more so they are in no hurry to explain why all this is happening.

Changes are noticed by many people who write about it, but science is silent. A popular U.S. informal radio host, Hal Turner, recently brought up the subject on his show and detailed his observations.

"The sun sets much further north than it used to. I live at North Bergen, NJ 07047. My house is located on the western slope, 212 feet above sea level. I moved here in 1991, I live on the third floor, with a balcony facing west For many years I enjoyed beautiful sunsets from this balcony, and at the beginning of the summer of 2017, I unexpectedly noticed that the Sun was setting in a completely different place than before.

It used to set in the west, but now it sets in the northwest. Moreover, it has shifted so much that if earlier I watched the sunset looking straight ahead, now, in order to see the sunset, I have to turn my head to the right.

I am not a scientist or an academician, but I have been living here for 26 years and I see that the Sun does not set at all where it used to be. The only reasonable explanation for this fact is that the Earth has changed the angle of its axis. Why is NASA praying, why do all the scientists of the world do not notice or do not want to notice this?

Influence of Planet X (Nibiru)?

Judging by the fact that billionaires, governments and other rulers of the world are preparing safe shelters for themselves, creating "arks" for storing seeds and the cultural heritage of human civilization, they know about the approaching global catastrophe.

Perhaps that is why the space programs of NASA, Elon Musk (Space X) and Jeff Bezos (Blue Origin) began to actively develop, the purpose of which is to resettle the chosen ones to other planets and create colonies there.

Nibiru, also known as planet X, is considered to be a planet whose orbit at perihelion crosses the solar system between Mars and Jupiter once every 3600-4000 years. The Sumerians left a description of this planet, which says that it is inhabited by highly developed intelligent beings - the Anunnaki.

Not so long ago, just a few years ago, scientists called information about planet X a myth and pseudoscience, and then these same people who laughed at Nibiru themselves announced the discovery of Planet X. Maybe it's time to openly tell people about the real causes of global climate change and about planet X, also tell. Maybe the time has come?

Around its axis, resulting in a change of day and night. But how strictly constant is the direction of the imaginary earth's axis in space? Or is this rotation causing movement of the earth's poles?

Earth is a spinning top

The incessant movement of the earth's poles

What changes can the shifting of the Earth's axis cause?

The importance of a stable direction in the space of the earth's axis