Site sections
Editor's Choice:
- Parade in China on May 9. Victory day in china. Participation of foreign military teams
- Prince alexander nevsky - adopted son of khan baty
- Mongolian writing: a winding path, or the burden of the Cyrillic alphabet
- Great Khan of the Mongol Empire Genghis Khan: biography, years of rule, conquests, descendants
- The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: causes and consequences
- Conquest of Siberia: Myths and Reality
- How will the attempt of Kazakhstan to switch to the Latin alphabet end? Translation of the Kazakh into the Latin alphabet reasons
- Analysis of the possibilities for the development of non-traditional types of tourism on the territory of the Republic of Kalmykia Sights, entertainment and excursions in Kalmykia
- In the form in which they meet - But really, this was not the case before
- Border crossings of Mongolia
Advertising
| Baikal saves itself and us. Thanks for the interview. Good luck to you |
|
Tatarinov Alexander Vasilievich - geologist, doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences. From 1960 to 1965 - student of the Geological Faculty of Kazan State University. As part of the Baikal-Sayan Expedition No. 123 he worked in the period 1967-1983. the chief geologist of the Slyudyansk party, the head of the Revision-Thematic Party, carried out searches and evaluation of deposits of lapis lazuli, jadeite, amethyst, precious stones of pegmatites, quartz, corundum, etc. In 1975, A.V. Tatarinov defended his Ph.D. and the genesis of minerals of pegmatites of the Borshchovochny Ridge. From 1982 to 1991 Alexander Vasilievich worked as a senior researcher. East Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources (VostSibNIIGGiMSa). In 1991 A.V. Tatarinov moved to Irkutsk State University and headed the laboratory of petrology and ore genesis at the Department of Mineralogy and Petrography, where he worked until 1996. In 1994 he defended his doctoral dissertation on the topic: Gemstone formations and the genesis of colored stones in Siberia ... From 1996 to 2001 A.V. Tatarinov worked as a senior researcher. at the Chita Institute of Natural Resources SB RAS (CHIPR SB RAS). In 2001, he was elected by competition to the gold laboratory of the Buryat Geological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the position of Leading Researcher. and works up to the present time. A.V. Tatarinov is the author of numerous publications on gems and geological reports: Publications of A.V. Tatarinov on the topic: precious and colored stones: Dobretsov N.L., A. V. Tatarinov Jadeite and nephrite in ophiolites. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983. –126 p. Kiziyarov G.P., A. V. Tatarinov, Platonov A.N., Belichenko V.P., Zavyalova L.L. The first finds of jewelry and ornamental jadeite in the Western Sayan // Geology and Geophysics. –1978. - No. 11. - P.89-101. A. V. Tatarinov, Kiziyarov G.P., Zavyalova L.L., Brandt S.B. Ore minerals and peculiarities of the origin of jadeites and nephrites in ultrabasites of Siberia // Dokl. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. –1980. - T.250. - No. 2. - P.434-438. A. V. Tatarinov Silica minerals and conditions for the formation of amethyst mineralization in skarn-iron ore fields in the south of the Siberian platform // Mineralogy and genesis of colored stones. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983. - pp. 34-41. A. V. Tatarinov, Kiziyarov GP, Prokudin SG .. Spherolite aggregates of jewelry and ornamental jadeite of the Borussian belt of ophiolites of the Western Sayan // Mineralogy and genesis of colored stones. - Novosibirsk: Science, 1983. - P.90-96. Reznitsky L.Z., A. V. Tatarinov Lavrovite of the Southern Baikal region - a new type of gemstone // Mineralogy and genesis of colored stones. - Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983 .-- S. 13-17. Reznitsky L.Z., A. V. Tatarinov, Kravchenko G.A. Galanova A.P., Uschapovskaya Z.F. Lavrovite in the Slyudyanka crystalline complex (Southern Cisbaikalia) // Dokl. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. - 1982. - T.267. - No. 1. - P. 203-206. A. V. Tatarinov, Sklyarov E.V., Khaltueva V.K., Nesmelov G.G. Jewelry and ornamental rodingites // Petrology and mineralogy of Siberian basites // Ed. N.L. Dobretsova. - M :, 1984. - S.10-18. A. V. Tatarinov, Sapozhnikov A.N., Prokudin S.G., Frolova L.P. Stichtite in serpentinites of the Terekta ridge (Gorny Altai) // Zap. Vses. min. islands. - 1985. Issue. 6. - S. 575-581. A. V. Tatarinov, Belyaevsky V.I., Yurgenson G.A. Corundum mineralization of the Western Baikal region // Applied mineralogy of Eastern Siberia. - Irkutsk: Irkut. un-t, 1991. - S. 28-38. A. V. Tatarinov Gemstone formations of Siberia // Geology and Geophysics. - 1992. - No. 11. - P.116-125. Where did spirogyra and elodea come from on Baikal, is the "sacred sea" threatened with death, why was the lake called "Baigaal - a big fire" and is there oil in Buryatia? About this in an interview with ARD author Sergei Basayev with Doctor of Geology Alexander Tatarinov
Today the following version of "the Baikal catastrophe" prevails in the press. The reason, ostensibly, is a strong anthropogenic impact on the lake, drains into the lake in a high content of phosphates, which the damned spirogyra feeds on. In short, people are to blame for everything - wild tourists, residents of settlements on Lake Baikal, from which flows into the lake. Alexander Tatarinov, a specialist in mud volcanism in the Baikal rift zone, chief researcher at the Geological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, presents a completely different picture of what is happening on Lake Baikal this summer. Alexander Vasilyevich, what explains, in your opinion, the current situation on Lake Baikal? And is it connected with the processes of mud volcanism, which you have been doing for many years? This spring and early summer, in the shallow water at the mouth of the Selenga, the staff of the Irkutsk University, in particular, the head of the Department of Oil and Gas, Professor Viktor Isaev and his group, noted a sharp activity of the processes of mud volcanism. That is, there was, of course, a strong release of gas, partly oil. But most importantly, mud volcanoes have become more active in this part of Lake Baikal. In such cases, there is always a strong inflow of heat from the depths, which caused this effect: the waters of Lake Baikal began to slightly change the temperature and heat up, gas hydrates (frozen methane - S. B.) began to melt at the bottom of the lake. And if earlier this, let's say, ice bed of gas hydrates kept the temperature level of cold water, then this year it melted and the methane itself went into the water column. As a result, the water has warmed up sharply. It is this circumstance, plus the unusual heat on the coast, that caused such sharp changes in temperature conditions. In addition to the results of Isaev's group, there are also my observations. This summer I went to Goryachinsk, where I had not been for two years. So, the temperature in the hot spring has noticeably increased there. Several degrees at once, exactly. So that it was impossible to lower your hand into the source! In general, the depth of the source is at least two to three kilometers. So this whole artesian pool, which gives water in this source, is also very hot. - What caused the artesian pool under the spring in Goryachinsk to heat up? Due to the fact that a mantle plume, as geologists call it, or a hot mantle flow, which occurs in this place at a depth of 32 kilometers and below, has become active in this place. After all, down there the temperature of the magma is 1100 degrees. Thus, everything coincided - from above the sun, wild heat, from below a hot inflow from the depths of Lake Baikal due to the activity of volcanoes. This combination of impacts caused the temperature conditions in Lake Baikal to change dramatically. And immediately there were species that love such warmth! In addition, methane, carbon dioxide, as well as minerals and geochemical elements - phosphorus, phosphates, iron, nickel, cobalt and other elements that algae feed on - come from the depths. Here biologists must already understand what the maximum conditions are under which the rapid reproduction of algae takes place and to what extent the current conditions on Lake Baikal coincide with this. But the essence of what is happening is obvious. This is a combination of endogenous and, let's say, cosmogenic or cosmic influences. Therefore, in my opinion, it would be complete idiocy to believe that the main reason for the appearance of these algae, Spirogyra and Elodea, is some kind of anthropogenic pollution!
Mass flowering of Spirogyra. Photo from www.scientificrussia.ru - Some say that all these troubles come from wild tourism ... This is utterly absurd. By the way, the head of Buryatia, Vyacheslav Nagovitsyn, was right, who did not link the anthropogenic factor with the appearance of algae. He said that there are places on Lake Baikal where the nearest housing is 200-300 kilometers away and there are no tourists in these places, but there are algae there too. This is indeed the case. Recently, space images of Baikal have appeared in the press, where the area of distribution of Spirogyra algae, Canadian Elodea along the coast is visible. Just in the Selenga delta and to the north - in Goryachinsk, Barguzinsky Bay, Zmeinaya Bay. Where, as you say, the activity of mud volcanoes is noticeable. Are there any plants that can be called the mark of such volcanoes? Perhaps in the water it is Elodea. But on land it is horsetail, which is also found in shallow water. For example, I recorded it in the same Zmeinaya Bay, where the famous hot springs are located. Horsetail is a classic! For example, when I worked in the Sayan region, I discovered about 300 vents of mud volcanoes. So, the horsetail hit was one hundred percent - where there is horsetail, there is a volcano mouth. You can also find the mouth of the volcano by the color of the grass. If there is an activity of a mud volcano, then in the place where its mouth is located, the grass is intensely colored, to an emerald green color! I did this in the Trans-Baikal Territory, in the Irkutsk Region, in the Sayan region, here in Buryatia, on Lake Baikal. And everywhere they are, dear ones! It's just that other people do not see them point-blank and think that there are mud volcanoes only on Lake Baikal. By the way, if it were not for the Dutch and not the Americans who somehow came to us, then more than twenty large mud volcanoes at the bottom of Lake Baikal would not have been known so far. And our geologists then simply disgraced themselves. I started studying such volcanoes in the 80s, when some people laughed at me when I said they were mud volcanoes.
Mud volcanoes at the bottom of Baikal Is it true that the phosphates that Spirogyra feeds on have always been at the bottom of Lake Baikal? That is, where a person with their own detergents cannot get it? Yes, there are scientific publications about phosphorites at the bottom of Lake Baikal, this is a fact known to science for a long time. Now, manganese nodules, phosphates, phosphorites are found at the bottom of the world's oceans, the presence of which is associated with the activity of mud volcanoes! That is, now a lot is changing in science, and the concept of the world's oceans, too. Because the presence of phosphates is one of the signs of volcanic activity. There are a lot of these signs at the bottom of Lake Baikal, and the presence of phosphates, and they have always been there, is one of these signs. Thus, the emergence of a breeding ground for algae is not related to the fact that people are now actively using detergents containing phosphates. - What other signs of volcanic activity on Lake Baikal are there? The appearance of gas hydrates, for example, or oil. I have personally found droplets of solidified oil even in travertines. Have you seen travertines on arshans, springs? Carbonate travertines, they are also called calcareous tuffs, these are deposits of carbonic sources. They are so spongy, like limestone, gray or white. They cover the branches of trees on the arshans. This is also a sign of the activity of mud volcanoes. Because a mud volcano is not only the flow of some kind of pulp enriched with gas. Eventually, the volcano turns into a water source, from where water alone comes. That is, first all the material is thrown away - sand, silt - and then only water comes. And these mineral springs, in fact, are one of the forms of manifestation of mud volcanism.
Calcareous tuffs. Photo from www.rider3099.livejournal.com Tell me, when can Spirogyra, which, as it turns out now, is a sign of activation of mud volcanism, can finally disappear on Lake Baikal? Such favorable conditions for the reproduction of Spirogyra, which are now on Lake Baikal, may not exist already next year! If these conditions are not met, then it will disappear. By the way, we have a vivid example with Lake Kotokel, where the whole situation took place as a result of volcanic activity. Do you remember why they didn’t shout about him then? "Guff disease" was invented! I recently went there and observed. I wandered farther, saw that oil had gone from the bottom. I washed the sand from the bottom, and there are bitumens! All over the place! Then these "bumps" on the shore. In fact, these are frozen mud volcano griffins. I ask the locals: have you seen how the ice breaks in winter? They say: yes, they saw air holes on the ice, methane gas came and oil spilled. The study of these phenomena at Kotokel was left at the mercy of biologists. And what can they say about the cause of these phenomena? Nothing, since the reason is geological!
Lake Kotokel. Photo from www.angara.net And when someone suggested "to clean the bottom of the Kotokel from algae", it was a quiet horror! It was also possible to upset all the equilibrium that now exists. Now between the volcano and the water there are silty-sandy natural sediments. And with this excavator, you can make a kind of outlet for the volcano. And what will go from there? It was just these actions that could have completely ruined the entire lake. And now he is already quite clean, this Kotokel! And these phenomena on Lake Baikal, spirogyra and so on, will also disappear. If conditions change next year, then a harsher winter and colder summer awaits us. And the fading of this hot plume. But when will it die out? Nobody knows for sure! Not a single scientist. This winter, you will need to see where these circles on the ice will be, about which they once wrote that these are traces of flying saucers (laughs), these holes in the ice. If there are a lot of them, then it’s bad - a summer like this year can be repeated. And if these circles, which are traces of a warm inflow from the depths during volcanic activity, are rare and, as usual, there will be few of them, then next year everything will be fine. The composition of the water will change and there will be no heat, - It turns out that Spirogyra does not multiply in cold water? Well, of course. If the water temperature drops, nothing like this year will happen. And everything will be restored in a natural way, like in Kotokel. This is an elementary thing that is associated with the cyclical nature of the processes on Lake Baikal. The biggest threat to all life in Baikal is Baikal itself! Remember where the oil slick started last year? - In the Barguzinsky Bay, as far as I remember ... Right! And where did it come from? The whole composition with oil was poured into Baikal, or what? No, she rose from the bottom. And the repeated mass deaths of the seal and omul! The last time in the Barguzinsky Bay, 9 tons of dead fish were caught! But the best example of volcanic activity is the large lakes in Transbaikalia. For example, in the Trans-Baikal Territory there are lakes Zun-Torey and Barun-Torey. Large lakes, on a scale like Goose Lake in Buryatia. At our institute Fyodor Krendelev (former director of the Geological Institute of the SB RAS - SB) dealt with this problem. So what was going on there? The lake dries up, then it fills up again. It happened in 2006 - the lake itself dries up, all the fish dies. In July of that year, we went there, we ourselves saw how the entire coast was strewn with dead fish, the water was turbid, and methane was released. And Isaev from Irkutsk recorded 9 tons of dead fish in Barguzin in 2009. This is how it happens. Such things as an oil slick and so on, it is Baikal itself that does this! And, are there any pathetic BPPM? In 2006, we saw about the same in the Torey Lakes.
Dead fish on the shores of Lake Zun-Torey. Photo from www.daurzapoved.com And what picture did you see when you sank to the bottom of Lake Baikal during the expedition "Mirov" on Lake Baikal in 2009? We then dived to a depth of 1400 meters near Olkhon on the St. Petersburg mud volcano. The picture was similar there. All living creatures - and these are such huge gobies, golomyanka - lie around these openings of mud volcanoes. Warmth, food comes from there, and they go crazy. OK. We took sand and silt from the bottom for testing, and everyone who was, both biologists and we, gasped! My mother, there are the same dead fish! That is, they were poisoned right at the bottom, and retribution for them was inevitable. And what, where is the anthropogenic impact? At a depth of 1400 meters? And this is the same thing that was observed in 2008 at Kotokel, when there, due to the activity of the processes of mud volcanism, there was a massive poisoning by gases of fish. Now in the north of Baikal, because of Spirogyra, people cannot approach the lake. They write that there is a locomotive depot in Severobaikalsk, whose effluents contain detergents "with a strong antibacterial component." Therefore, biological wastewater treatment does not work and from this, supposedly, all the troubles. What, in your opinion, is happening there? This is the challenge for biologists. If spirogyra develops only in alkaline conditions, then the PH, that is, acid-alkalinity, should be 8-9 units, as in alkaline hot springs, such as the Goryachinsky spring. Soapy water should be. And what, it became soapy on Lake Baikal because of this depot? In this case, algae are formed in a freshwater environment, in ordinary Baikal fresh water. This means that this factor has nothing to do with it. At the bottom of Lake Baikal there is pore water on mud volcanoes, which was studied by the staff of the Limnological Institute. They took sand and silt and squeezed the bottom water out of it. And it turned out to be not at all ultra-fresh, as everywhere in Lake Baikal, but mineralized. As in the Goryachinsky spring! That is, in the process of mud volcanism, such mineral water flows into Baikal. - How does it affect fresh water? For that huge mass of fresh water, this mineral water is exactly one drop! And so no one feels it. So, if we take the shallow waters of the northern Baikal region, then there are underwater hot springs, whose inflow, perhaps, makes the water in Baikal slightly alkaline and adds trace elements to the fresh Baikal water. So all sorts of depots here have no effect. It's easier than a steamed turnip! In the north of Lake Baikal there is the Yarki area, where the Verkhneangarsky sor and a reserve with a large spawning ground for omul are located. There is also a lot of algae growing there, there are hot springs nearby. And how do these conditions affect the fish? Omul grows his young growth there, isn't it? I don’t think this influence is negative. The fact is that algae is also a certain purification filter for water! They take everything unnecessary from Baikal water, all pollution. If there is some kind of flow of alkaline water, then the algae take it upon themselves, thus purifying the water in Baikal. Then, will the judgment be correct that the more algae, the better for Baikal, the faster it will be cleansed? Yes, algae purifies water. And then, when they have nothing to eat, the water will cease to be as warm as this year, these algae will disappear by themselves. Or the Baikal crustaceans will devour them! What is terrible in this spirogyra, in Canadian elodea? I think scaring people with Spirogyra is ignorance and idiocy. Nagovitsyn, I repeat, was absolutely right when he resented the savagery of such assessments in the media. I recently watched on TV an interview with Bair Tsyrenov, representative of the Metropol company in the People's Khural of Buryatia. To be honest, speculation surprised me, such as the fact that there were a lot of wild tourists, the load on Baikal increased. It's scary to think, people wash in Lake Baikal, wash their hair! And from this, they say, such an effect - spirogyra and so on. In general, the people who rest on Lake Baikal are to blame for everything. What do you think? People wash themselves, and they do the right thing! Shouldn't they wash themselves now, or what? Nothing wrong with that. And those people who say this just want to privatize Baikal and they really do not like it when ordinary people come to Baikal, which they already consider their property. Therefore, such statements about wild tourism are from the same opera. The idea is to sort it out in general, but on what basis are these people, whom I call the oligarchic rabble, privatizing Baikal?
By the way, about the Baikal Pulp and Paper Mill, which, thank God, was closed. How serious was the impact of the BPPM on Lake Baikal? How did the lake cope with such a load? Of course, it's good that it was closed. Because now it will be much cleaner on Baikal. But frankly, for him, such a load is the same drop in the ocean. Including those wastes that were dumped into Baikal. He coped with them quite well. So it's too early for us to bury nature ... I would like to give another example in this connection. The Gulf of Mexico, where a huge amount of oil spilled several years ago. Then everyone grabbed their heads, what to do! But now it is no longer there, this oil. They ate bacteria, that's it, she's not there! Bacteria, it turns out, eat everything up, and even oil goes for a sweet soul! They just freak out when oil spills happen. Another, even wilder example. In the Pacific Ocean, remember, from the shores of Japan and Southeast Asia, trash has accumulated from cellophane, polyethylene with an area of one million square kilometers. Whole islands or even a continent of garbage could be seen from satellites! And where is he now? He is absent! They also gobbled up the bacteria. They ate everything cleaned up, cellophane and polyethylene. And the whole world gasped, where did the million square kilometers of polyethylene go? After all, this garbage had to first be taken apart, then buried. All the efforts of mankind would not be enough to dispose of it. And he took it and just disappeared! Thanks to bacteria. Is it possible to collect these bacteria or remove them, multiply and dispose of all the garbage on Lake Baikal with their help? Easy! After all, they are also used for mining, for example, gold or other minerals. There are bacteria that feed only on gold. They devour it, then die themselves, and what remains after them combines into large particles of gold, nuggets, which are formed in place of large colonies of bacteria. I know that this method of bioleaching and other biotechnologies have been used for a long time in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. In general, biotechnology is widely used all over the world to extract various components. The fact is that different bacteria have their own taste preferences. For example, some bacteria feed only on copper, others on gold, there are bacteria that simply adore platinum. So, to scare everyone that Baikal will die from some kind of anthropogenic impact is the most complete nonsense. Another thing is that, over time, the variability of any water body is observed. This can be well illustrated by the example of the same Torey lakes in the Aginsky district. I myself walked along the bottom of these lakes, I saw that everything was dry there, no fish, nothing. And suddenly this whole bowl was again filled with the purest water! The fish appeared there again! She recently died all over, there was nothing, everything was dry. And now, please, there is fish and good, clean water. After a while, gas is released again with a volcanic eruption, and again everything dries up. This is how everything goes, according to the law of cyclicality. Another hot topic for Buryatia is Lake Kotokel. It is now very shallow, the water border has shifted a lot, and people there walk on the former bottom, ride in cars where there used to be water. These ugly ones hang on Facebook. By the way, they say that the algae are no longer visible there. So is it possible now to predict when Kotokel will recover in its former beautiful form, with its clean, warmed up water, with fish. When are we going to ride catamarans there again? This will all, of course, be restored. But it is impossible to accurately predict and say when this will happen. The conditions there are determined by the flow of water, so to speak, the debit of underwater sources that act on the bottom of the lake. And it depends only on seismicity. And mankind does not know how to predict it, even if you crack! It is possible to put at least a hundred seismic stations there and on Lake Baikal, and still you will not give any accurate forecast. And so it is all over the world. I know that a lot of money is spent on these developments, but there are no results yet, because it is impossible to determine the time of the approach of earthquakes by one information criterion. Here you need to know the complex of signs. Where can I get it? There is no such information anywhere. We know that there is a direct connection between earthquakes and the water level in the wells. - By the way, now the water level in the wells on the coast of Lake Baikal has dropped. Will he recover? Yes, of course, it will recover. Have you watched the new American film San Andreas Rift, which simulates the alleged California earthquake? It impressively shows how everything will happen, what people need to do in critical conditions ... No, I didn't. But, of course, I know about this Pacific rift zone, about the San Andreas Fault. But we live on the border of the Baikal rift zone. How likely are strong earthquakes of, say, 9 on the Richter scale, here in Buryatia, in Ulan-Ude, possible in the near future? We had such earthquakes, both 9 and 10 points. But only they occurred in the center of the rift zone, in the Baikal Basin itself, its axial part, where the top of the mantle plume is located. In general, Baikal, of course, removes this threat from us. - That is, mud volcanoes reduce the threat of a major earthquake? Of course, this is all connected, and volcanic activity provides some relaxation of seismic activity. And the revival of the processes of mud volcanism, by the way, indicates an increase in seismicity. For example, in 1959, when there was a strong earthquake in the area of the village of Oimur, geophysicists from the Institute of the Earth's crust came there and saw a 12-kilometer crack, such, I would say, a "break." There was pulp from volcanoes in the crack, many small craters, griffins of mud volcanoes were found around. That is, those earthquakes that occur quite often on Lake Baikal could have been much stronger if the mud volcanoes, including at the bottom of Lake Baikal, had not been working? In general, living in dry conditions is more dangerous. Just recently there was a terrifying earthquake in Nepal. But if there was a large body of water, mud volcanism would take place near the water, then, perhaps, such terrible consequences would not have happened. At the very least, this would definitely reduce the strength of the earthquake, because some of the energy would be spent on lifting the pulp to the surface. - It turns out that Baikal protects all of us from strong earthquakes ?! Quite right! Because if the epicenter is not on land, but in Baikal itself, then this is not so scary. Well, fishermen can get hit by a mini tsunami. But there will be no dire consequences. It happened with us and 10 points at the bottom of Lake Baikal, in its southern half. - Alexander Vasilyevich, do you have your own concept of how Baikal was born? In my opinion, in the place of Baikal there used to be a chain of such swampy areas, swamps, small lakes. And then a crack formed in the earth's crust, which was filled with water. But the main question is, where did such ideally clean, ultra-fresh water come from here, devoid of any impurities at all? There are geologists who believe that this is a melted glacier! But in fact, this is not a glacier. In my opinion, such pure water is the result of hydrogen oxidation, that's all. And the filling of the Baikal bowl happened not from above, but from below. Together with the deep mantle plume, a huge mass of hydrogen entered Baikal, and when combined with oxygen, hydrogen oxidized. And the result is such ultra-pure water. Almost one hydrogen! - But they always explained to us that these are Baikal crustaceans - Gammarus, Epishura - they mainly clean Baikal. All the same, the main role in the fact that such pure water in Baikal is played by the process of hydrogen oxidation. But crustaceans are also very useful for the ecosystem of the lake. Gammarus, for example, really loves oxygen. This crustacean, by the way, was also in Kotokel. But when there, as a result of volcanic activity, poisoning of all living things with methane and geochemical elements occurred, the gammarus disappeared there in the first place. Because it is very sensitive, and when there is little oxygen, it immediately dies. We know about Epishura that it feeds on algae, eats most of these very algae. In general, every living creature on Lake Baikal draws food for itself from the water. There are bacteria that even eat mercury with pleasure, and uranium and, in general, whatever. Therefore, one should always rejoice when some kind of living creature appears in Lake Baikal. Everything is perfectly arranged there. Now, the algae Spirogyra and Elodea, which appeared this year, well clean the water in Lake Baikal from chemical elements after volcanic emissions. And well, let them clean! Many thanks to them for that. And the crustaceans will then free Baikal from algae. And thanks to them too! So, to panic, they say, Baikal is dying from Spirogyra, this, I think, is a great nonsense. - Tell me, is it possible to extract oil on Lake Baikal? It seems to me that here the question should be posed differently. Is it necessary to get it there ?! Because we have the most oil in Buryatia in the Bauntovsky and Yeravninsky districts. There are billions of tons of this oil! Why do this on Baikal? You can also harm him greatly, disrupt the entire ecosystem. - Is there oil and gas in the Barguzin Valley? There, too, you do not need to mine anything. Since the ecosystem of the Barguzin River, unlike Baikal, is rather fragile. And in the Bount, please! Since 1996, I have been submitting my third application for the discovery of an oil field. But for some reason, it is being slowed down and slowed down all the time. Now in Tomsk and Moscow some kind of lobby has already formed, which needs oil and gas fields to never be discovered here, so that nothing can develop here at all. Neither in Buryatia nor in the Trans-Baikal Territory. Who are these lobbyists? "Fifth column"! Kidding. Only one thing can be said about these comrades from the Ministry of Natural Resources, Gazprom and other Sibneft: this is a criminal government. Let's go back to the moment when Baikal was formed. All the same, I would like to more clearly imagine the very process of the emergence of Baikal from the chain of swamps and lakes. Is it possible? Oh well. For us, the inhabitants of Buryatia, nature itself gave a very good and clear example of how this could happen, the formation of Lake Baikal. This is an example of the formation of a very young Goose Lake, which arose more than 150 years ago, almost before our eyes. Goose Lake, of course, is much smaller than Baikal, but the process itself, so to speak, a model of education, is exactly the same! If you believe Nikolai Bestuzhev and other Decembrists, who gave descriptions of what used to be on the site of Goose Lake, then they saw there exactly what I told you about - swampy areas, small salt lakes. And then such a large lake arose. What happened? Why did a large freshwater reservoir appear on the site of salt lakes and swamps? The fact that the water when filling the reservoir became fresh due to the oxidation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide is indicated by the following. On the shores of Lake Goose, burnt rocks are visible everywhere - red, yellow. They are clearly visible, since not much time has passed. When filling the reservoir from the depths, then everything there burned, oxidized. And at the same time, a fresh water body arose. But there remained in it zonal water, which is not completely fresh in terms of its hydrochemical composition. Preserved areas, small zones of alkaline water, the same as in the mineral spring. Right in the Goose Lake itself, there are still such zones. Here is a vivid example of the formation of a reservoir. Baikal is exactly the same education, only on a larger scale. Moreover, Baikal was formed not for a long time, but, figuratively speaking, "in the blink of an eye", like Goose Lake! On this topic, I will probably write an article soon, the purpose of which will be to compare the model of formation of lakes - Baikal and Goose Lake. In Buryat mythology, by the way, the process of the formation of Lake Baikal is described exactly as you are telling it now. The legends of the Buryats speak of an earthquake, the formation of a crack, a long standing of a huge flame, a "big fire". This is reflected in the name of the lake. Baigaal is a "big fire". Exactly! Only "big fire" !! That is, there was a process of active oxidation and combustion. Hopefully I'll write about it. In Russia, of course, this will not be published. But in English it can be published with one left! Because the scientists there are different, not like ours. Here, on the way of this publication, all our academicians will lay down logs. Because it contradicts their ideas and what they wrote before. They say that Baikal was formed millions or even tens of millions of years ago, that the process itself took a long time. I believe that the process of the formation of the lake went very quickly. And this was not millions of years ago, but quite recently. Maybe 10 thousand years ago, or even less! - Thanks for the interview. Good luck to you. referenceTatarinov Alexander Vasilievich - geologist, doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences. From 1960 to 1965 - student of the Geological Faculty of Kazan State University. As part of the Baikal-Sayan Expedition No. 123 he worked in the period 1967-1983. the chief geologist of the Slyudyansk party, the head of the Revision-Thematic Party, carried out searches and evaluation of deposits of lapis lazuli, jadeite, amethyst, precious stones of pegmatites, quartz, corundum, etc. In 1975, A.V. Tatarinov defended his Ph.D. and the genesis of minerals of pegmatites of the Borshchovochny Ridge. From 1982 to 1991 Alexander Vasilievich worked as a senior researcher. East Siberian Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources (VostSibNIIGGiMSa). In 1991 A.V. Tatarinov moved to Irkutsk State University and headed the laboratory of petrology and ore genesis at the Department of Mineralogy and Petrography, where he worked until 1996. In 1994 he defended his doctoral dissertation on the topic: Gemstone formations and the genesis of colored stones in Siberia ... From 1996 to 2001 A.V. Tatarinov worked as a senior researcher. at the Chita Institute of Natural Resources SB RAS (CHIPR SB RAS). In 2001, he was elected by competition to the gold laboratory of the Buryat Geological Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the position of Leading Researcher. and works up to the present time. A.V. Tatarinov is the author of numerous publications on gems and geological reports. Alexey Valerianovich Tatarinov (1858 - d.) Nikolay Valerianovich Tatarinov (1857 - 1857) Anastasia Valerianovna Tatarinova (1864 - d.) Mikhail Grigorievich "s wife" s third great niece Pavel Astafiev Daughter of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova Vladimir Valerianovich Tatarinov (1865 - d.) Mikhail Grigorievich "s wife" s third great nephew Pavel Astafiev Son of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova Alexey Valerianovich Tatarinov (1858 - d.) Mikhail Grigorievich "s wife" s third great nephew Petr Anatolyevich Trefilov Son of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova Tatarinovs Description of the coat of arms
DS, volume XIV, p. 10 Tatarinovs Description of the coat of arms: see text XIV, 10 VI Tatarinovs are noble families. The Herbovnik includes two branches of the Tatarinov family: Tatarinovs, whose ancestors were granted estates in 1580 (Coat of arms. III, 42). Description of the coat of arms The shield is divided vertically. In the right blue part there is a silver fortress, above it, vertically, one above the other, are two silver six-pointed stars. On the left, in a red field, crosswise gold and silver swords with a point up. Above the shield is a noble crowned helmet with three ostrich feathers. The basting on the shield is blue, enclosed in silver. The coat of arms of the Tatarinovs is included in Part 14 of the Collection of diploma coats of arms of the Russian Nobility, not included in the General Armorial, p. 10. DS, volume XIV, p. 10 1 Tatarinov Tata; Rinov is a Russian surname. Several genera of different origins, but mainly from Kazan and Meshchera of the 16th-17th centuries. Tatarinovs are noble families. The nobility with estates was approved in 1580. Obviously, they retained knowledge of the Turkic languages - see Peter Tatarinov, interpreter of the ambassadorial order in the 15th century, some also lived in Kazan - Semyon Tatarinov, a resident in Kazan in 1568. Tatarinov, Alexander: Tatarinov, Alexander Alekseevich (1817-1886) - diplomat, scientist Tatarinov, Alexey Nikolaevich: Tatarinov, Alexey Nikolaevich (1895-1978) - military leader, participant in the Civil and Great Patriotic Wars, Major General of the Coastal Service. Tatarinov, Andrey: Tatarinov, Andrey Alekseevich (born 1951) - Russian diplomat. Tatarinov, Valerian Alekseevich (1816-1871) - statesman. Tatarinov, Leonid Mikhailovich (1923-1943) - Soviet officer, participant of the Great Patriotic War, Hero of the Soviet Union. Tatarinov, Mikhail: Tatarinov, Mikhail Ivanovich (? -?) - Ataman of the Don Army. Tatarinov, Nikolai Matveyevich (born December 14, 1927) - Soviet athlete (modern pentathlon). Honored Master of Sports of the USSR, three-time world champion (1957-1959). Tatarinov, Yuri Borisovich (1920-1998) - Soviet engineer-colonel, candidate of technical sciences, winner of the Stalin Prize of the 3rd degree. Tatarinov, Yaroslav Vsevolodovich (1950-2010) - mathematician and mechanic, doctor of physical and mathematical sciences, professor. Tatarinova Tatarinova, Ekaterina Filippovna (1783-1856) - religious figure, organizer of the "Spiritual Union" in the aristocratic environment of St. Petersburg. In literature The Tatarinovs are characters in the novel “Two Captains” by Veniamin Kaverin and its adaptations. Tatarinov Volcano is an active volcano on the Paramushir Island of the Great Kuril Ridge. see also Tatarinovich Notes (edit) ; Veselovsky 974, p. 313)
The path to Nikolai Valerianovich Tatarinov has not been found. Son of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova Anastasia Valerianovna Tatarinova Daughter of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova Vladimir Valerianovich Tatarinov Son of Valerian Alekseevich Tatarinov and Polyxena Nikolaevna Tatarinova |
Popular:
New
- The first satellite of the earth Craft for the 60th anniversary of the launch of the satellite
- Space life: how do astronauts eat, brush their teeth, sleep, go to the toilet, sleep and have fun in zero gravity?
- From satellite to spacewalk: important achievements of the Soviet Union
- What is dna decryption
- The Casimir effect: a step towards space travel
- Expansion of the Universe: the speed of the process
- Sayings about loneliness
- Sayings about moments of life
- Poems about the death of a loved one are short
- We create our own world
