Do you know that the royal rule in Russia was not inherited before Christianization?

In Russia, they lived according to Kopnoy Pravo, where only those who, not in word, but in deed, proved that he was a normal smart man, a family man, and not a drunk or some kind of lazybones, had a voice. A handicraft craftsman, such as a woodworker. Here are 10 such men unanimously (!) chose the tenth, the tenths chose the sotsky, etc. to the Monarch, whose power was not inherited! Those. the best of the best was chosen, and when they saw him, the people said Tse Zarya (TSE (tse - this, this one) ZARYA (Dawn - Carrying Light)), which later was reduced to “King”. Children born from kings were called Tse Sarevich (Tse Zarevich). That is, it is the same as the son of the dawn. From the Etruscans (the Russian ethnic group is one of our clans), the Latins adopted this concept and called their rulers Caesar (Caesar). That's where there was freedom of speech, will and democracy of elections.

And who teaches us democracy today? Those who a thousand years ago imposed monarchy and totalitarianism.

About taxes in Russia

The tax was in the form of a tithe, i.e. everyone paid tithes. Those. 10th part of 144. Now instead of 144, 100 (%) is taken. In order to recalculate the tithe in a modern way, we will make up the proportion: 144/10 \u003d 100 / x. Hence x = 10 100/144 = 7 (%). The tithe went to the maintenance of the Cossacks (“the sighted horse”) and the construction of border towns to protect our lands from invaders. One of the camps of the Cossacks is now called KazakhStan, this happened after October revolution, although even before the revolution it was called the Cossack camp (KazakStan). The Cossacks were skilled warriors, and they were even hired by the Japanese emperors, the samurai probably did not reach the level of our Ancestors.

History of Russia

Our modern official history, taught in schools, took its final form in the 18th and 19th centuries AD. and was written in accordance with the biblical concept of history commissioned by the Romanovs. Thus, today we are taught from childhood that our history is only a little over 1000 years old. Allegedly, the brothers Cyril and Methodius did good to the dark and wild pagans, giving them writing.

Let's see what happened and who and how falsified our past.

Let's start with Tsar Peter the Great, who instead of “Summer” introduced the “Year” and in Summer 7208 from S.M.Z.Kh (Creation of the World in the Star Temple, where the creation of the world used to mean the signing of a peace treaty) On December 20, Peter I postponed the New Year by issuing a decree to congratulate each other on January 1 “with the new Got”, and to introduce a new foreign Julian calendar, where after December 31, 7208 from S.M. January 1, 1700 began from the birth of Christ. Thus, he easily and simply stole 5508 years of history from us.

Since our Ancestors wrote the numbers in drop caps, our writing has at least existed for more than 7.5 thousand years, which Catherine II wrote in her “Notes on Russian History”: “... the Slavs had a written language older than Nestor ...”.

But the worst thing was during Christianization, when in Russia the monuments of pre-Christian writing and culture of ancient Russia-Russia-Rasseniya were subjected to total destruction.

About the "Great" Prince Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko

The illegitimate son of the Khazar woman Malusha, Prince Vladimir, who illegally occupied the throne of Kyiv (by poisoning the legitimate heirs), introduced an alien religion with fire and sword. In the years from 988 to 1000, ¾ of the population was destroyed Kievan Rus, after which only 3 million people remained from the original 12 million. The survivors were mostly children and the elderly. Children deprived of parents were brought up in a Christian spirit, with the denial of the entire great Heritage of the Ancestors.

The Higher Clergy of Belovodye (the center of Belovodye was in Asgard, modern Omsk), the sacred land of Russenia-Rus-Russia in 1222 from the RH decided to create a special governing body to protect the Old Faith, which became known as: OR-DEN, which meant “Strength Light” or “Light Power”, where the Kh'aryan rune “OR” meant in Old Slavonic“strength”, the rune “DEN” meant “light”. This Light Power came from beyond the Urals in the form of retribution to the Russian lands, devastated and captured by the Greek-Jewish-Christian.

Tatar-Mongol yoke

This word “Order” was distorted by the Latins as “Orde”, and the writers of history changed it to the word “horde” and the Great Horde or the Mongol-Tatar yoke appeared. Foreigners called Russia Mongolia. The very name “Mongolia” (or Mogolia, as Karamzin and many other authors write, for example) comes from the Greek word “Megalion”, i.e. "Great". In Russian historical sources, the word "Mongolia" ("Mogolia") is not found. But meets " Great Russia". The word "Igo" means order, hence the name "Igor" - the guardian of order. “Tat” is an enemy, i.e. the Tatar is the enemy of the Aryan. And to whom could the Aryan be an enemy? Could he be an enemy of the Rasichs, i.e. to their brothers in the Clans of the Great RACE? No. The only one to whom he was an enemy was those who wanted to enslave these Rods. That is why they write in their history (from tori-ya) that to Russia (and they considered only Kiev and the surrounding lands to be Russia, and “Kievan Rus” was invented by M. Pogodin, who in his dissertation “On the Origin of Russia” ( 1825), as well as Messrs. G. Bayer, later G. Miller and A. Schlozer substantiated the Norman theory of the emergence of Russian statehood: “come and rule us”), the Great Horde went, or in other words - the Mongols-Tatars - the Great Enemies of the Aryans, not who accepted Christianity. And they went from the East of Rasseniya (Rasseniya are the territories over which the Clans of the Great Race settled), more precisely from Siberia, which in those days from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean and from the Cold Ocean to Central India was called Tarkhtaria, the land of which is patronized by the Gods - the son and daughter of Perun, brother and sister, Tarkh, nicknamed Dazhdbog (Giving God), and his younger sister Tara. Our Ancestors told foreigners: "... we are the children of Tarkh and Tara ...". Later, Tarkhtaria became Tartaria, and the biblical people, who hardly pronounce the letter “r”, called it Tataria.

Let's look at the map of 1754 "I-e Carte de l'Asie"

Through the entire vast territory of the Russian Empire, up to Pacific Ocean, including Mongolia, Far East etc., there is an inscription in large letters: Grande Tartaria, that is, Great Tartaria.

Now it is clear that the words “Tatar” and “Tatar” had nothing to do with modern Tatars until, after the revolution of 1917, historians of biblical nationality decided to falsify the “trace of the Mongol-Tatar yoke”, so that by another deception, substitution of concepts, to confirm his fictional story about the invasion of Russia by a never-existing enemy and avert suspicion from himself as a real enemy.

They carried out this plan to declare someone a former enemy for about a decade and a half, and Lazar Moiseevich Koganovich completed it in 1935, declaring several peoples Tatars: the Volga Bulgarians or Bulgars, baptized people, Uighurs, and also Siberians. Thus, in recent history, another substitution of names and concepts was carried out.

Once, in the northeast of the Black Sea, there was Khazaria, which undertook predatory and predatory attacks on neighboring peoples. Once Khazaria seized the Volga lands with their peace-loving peoples and subjugated them. But part of the Volga Bulgars did not want to submit to the power of the Khazars, and they, together with their khan (i.e. military leader) Astarukh, moved to the Danube, built their cities there and still live there - these territories are called Bulgaria. But note that modern historiography ranks the Danube Bulgarians among the Slavs, and their eastern brothers - the Volga, Kazan Bulgarians - to the Turks - to the Tatars.

What caused this division? Yes, due to the fact that from Tsar-grad Christianity was imposed on the Danube, and Islam was imposed to the Volga. And since in ancient times Islam was accepted mainly by Turkic tribes, therefore, the Volga Bulgarians began to be classified as Turks, although they were actually Slavic tribes that at first did not accept Christianity, but then Islam was forcibly imposed on many of their tribes.

However, among them there were tribes that did not recognize either Islam or Christianity, and many, especially along the Vyatka and higher, and closer to the Caspian Sea, remained on their ancient faith of the Ancestors and lived apart. Therefore, they still call themselves White Bulgarians.

Why don't modern Russian children get this knowledge at school?

Yes, again, because the modern official version of the history of the Russian people was finally formalized in the 18-19th century and was written in strict accordance with the biblical picture of the world: they say that there is the most ancient, God's chosen people - the Jews, and the Russians were Greeks (Semites) before they were Christianized ) by wild pagans, and even writing was given to the Russians by the Greek monks Cyril and Methodius.

In fact, the semi-literate monks Cyril and Methodius reduced the Slavic Initial Letter (I know God, I know the Verb Good ... - one of the types of our writing that existed in Russia many thousands of years before Christ) from 49 letters to 44, and four of the remaining letters were given Greek titles that do not contain such sound images. It was precisely those letters from the old Initial Letter that were destroyed that did not find a match in the Greek language.

Greek is built on the basis of simplified Phoenician, and Phoenician is based on Scythian, and Scythian is our Slavic, because. Scythians are one of the Slavic tribes. Yaroslav the Wise with his "wisdom" removed one more letter. The reformer Peter the Great removed five letters, Nicholas II - three, Lunacharsky - three, introduced "Yo" and removed images from the ABC (Az, Buki, Vedi ...) and introduced phonemics (a, b, c ...) and the ABC became the Alphabet (alpha + vita - in the Greek manner) and our mighty language became without figurative (ugly).

Materials taken from the site energodar.net/nasledie/tartariya.html

Our workshop produces wooden blanks for painting in Nizhny Novgorod region. RuTvor wooden blanks are ideal for creativity, for painting, burning, decoupage, in a word - for everything you may need them for. Wooden blanks RuTvor differ in quality and low price, because. blanks from the manufacturer. You can order and buy wooden blanks cheaply and in bulk.

Historical facts, accepted as an indisputable truth, sometimes cause many doubts among those who are used to analyzing the course of events and reading “between the lines”. Frank contradictions, silence and distortion of obvious facts cause healthy indignation, since interest in one's roots is inherent in man by nature. That is why a new direction of teaching has arisen - an alternative history. Reading various articles about the origin of mankind, the development and formation of states, one can understand how far the school history course is from reality. Facts, not supported by elementary logic and argumentation, are planted in young heads as the only true path of historical development. At the same time, many of them do not stand up to elementary analysis even by those who are not luminaries in this area, but are only interested in world history and know how to think sensibly.

The essence of alternative history

This direction is considered to be unscientific, since it is not regulated at the official level. However, reading articles, books and treatises on alternative history, it becomes clear that they are more logical, consistent and substantiated than the "official version" of events. So why are historians silent, why do they distort the facts? There can be many reasons for this:

• It is much more pleasant to present your origin in a more advantageous light. Moreover, it is enough just to provide the bulk of the population with an attractive theory, even if it does not fit in with the context of real history - they will definitely accept it “as their own”, amusing their self-esteem on the subconscious.
• The role of the victim is advantageous only in the event of a successful ending, because, as you know, all the "laurels" go to the winner. If it didn’t work out to defend your people, then, a priori, the enemies must be bad and insidious.
• To act on the attacking side, destroying other nationalities is “not comme il faut”, therefore it is at least unreasonable to flaunt such facts in the annals of historical events.

The list of reasons for lies and cover-ups in history is endless, but they all originate in one single statement: if it is written that way, then it is profitable. Moreover, in this context, the benefit implies not so much economic as moral, political and psychological comfort. And it doesn’t matter at all that any lie looks stupid, it’s enough just to analyze the indisputable facts of that time.

Over time, the alternative history becomes more complete and meaningful. Thanks to the work of people who are not indifferent to their origin in the annals of our country, and the world as a whole, there are less and less “dark spots”, and the chronology of events takes on a logical and consistent form. That is why reading about an alternative history is not only informative, but also pleasant - clearly verified facts make the narrative logical and reasonable, and accepting one's roots allows you to better understand the deep essence of historical events.

An alternative history of mankind: a look through the prism of logic

Darwin's theory of human origins is ideally suited to be taught to children as a cautionary tale about the benefits of work, with one acceptable context - it's just a fairy tale. Each artifact obtained during the excavations, each ancient find causes healthy skepticism regarding the official version of history, since they clearly contradict the voiced version. And if you consider that most of them are simply kept under the heading "Secret", the origin of mankind looks vague and doubtful at all. A consensus on this issue has not yet been formed, but one thing is known for certain: a person appeared much earlier than history ascribes to him.

• traces of a man of the era of dinosaurs discovered in Nevada, which are more than 50 million years old;
• a fossilized finger, which, according to research, has been stored for about 130 million years;
• hand-drawn metal vase, about half a billion years old.

The proof of the correctness of alternative versions of history is not limited to these facts - the number of traces of human presence in the ancient world is steadily growing, however, far from everyone is known to a wide range of people. Moreover, many theories regarding the course of historical events have already been voiced in the context of mythology, but scientists have dismissed them, since there was no evidence for this. Now, when the revealed facts convince of the opposite, they simply do not want to “lose face”, rewriting the history of mankind.

If in the course of evolution and technological progress people became more and more developed, then how were the famous Pyramids of Egypt? After all, even now, having a huge arsenal of equipment and building materials, such a structure causes delight and awe, because it seems almost unreal. But such pyramids were built not only on the African continent, but also in today's America, China, Russia and Bosnia. How could such inept and technically illiterate ancestors, according to the version of academic history, be able to build this?

Turning to the ancient Indian treatises, one can find references to flying chariots - the prototypes of modern aircraft. They are also mentioned in the writings of Maharshi Bharadwaja, a sage of the 4th century BC. His book was found back in the 19th century, but never had a resonance thanks to the efforts of those who adhere to the official version of history. These works were recognized as nothing more than entertaining writings based on a rich imagination, while the descriptions of the machines themselves, suspiciously reminiscent of modern ones, were considered mere conjectures.

Not only the ancient Indian works confirm the dubiousness of the academic theory of the development of mankind - the Slavic chronicles store no less number of confirmations. Based on the described technical structures, our distant ancestors could not only move through the air, but also make intergalactic flights. So why is the alternate history suggestion of Earth populating the planet from space considered practically insane? It is a completely logical and reasonable version that has the right to exist.

The question of the origin of man is considered one of the most controversial, since rare facts make one only speculate and speculate. The academic version assumes that mankind came out of Africa, but this version hardly withstands the elementary “strength test” of modern facts and discoveries. The novelties of alternative history seem more convincing, since even the latest articles in 2017 consider several options at once as a possible course of events. One of the confirmations of the plurality of theories are the works of Anatoly Klyosov.

Alternative history in the context of DNA genealogy

The founder of DNA genealogy, which reveals the essence of the migration processes of the ancient population through the prism of chromosomal similarities, is Anatoly Klyosov. His works cause a lot of indignant criticism in his address, since the theories set forth by the scientist openly contradict the official version of events about the African origin of the entire human race. The critical questions raised by Klyosov in his books and publications reveal the essence of the erroneous statements of popgeneticists that "anatomically modern man" (precisely in the context of the current genetic basis) went from African people by constant migration to neighboring continents. The main evidence of the academic version is the genetic diversity of Africans, but this fact cannot be considered confirming, but only makes it possible to put forward a theory that is not supported by any justification.

The main features of the idea promoted by Klyosov are as follows:

• the genetic genealogy founded by him (DNA genealogy) is a symbiosis of history, biochemistry, anthropology and linguistics, and not a subsection of academic genetics, as is commonly believed in scientific circles, accusing the author of quackery;
• This approach allows us to formulate a new calendar of ancient migrations of mankind, which is more accurate and scientifically justified than the official one.

According to the data obtained in the course of a long and rigorous analysis of historical, anthropological and chromosomal studies, the development "from the African source" is not complete, since the alternative history of the Slavs at that time was taking a parallel course. The Proto-Slavic origin of the Aryan race is confirmed by the fact that the chromosomal halogroup R1a1 came from the Dnieper territory and the Ural River and went to India, and not vice versa, as the official version of events claims.

His ideas are being actively promoted not only in Russia, but throughout the world: he founded " Russian Academy DNA Genealogy” is an international online organization. In addition to publishing online, Klyosov has published many books and periodicals. His collection of articles on alternative history, based on a DNA genealogical database, is constantly updated with new works, which each time lift the veil of secrecy over the most ancient civilization.

Tatar-Mongol yoke: an alternative history

In academic history Tatar-Mongol yoke there are still many “dark spots” that allow us to make assumptions and guesses not only for historians of our time, but also for ordinary people who are interested in their origins. Many details indicate that the Tatar-Mongol people did not exist at all. That is why the alternative history looks very reliable: the details are so logical and justified that, willy-nilly, doubts arise, but are the textbooks lying?

Indeed, there are no mentions of the Tatar-Mongols in any Russian chronicle, and the term itself causes healthy skepticism: well, where could such a nationality come from? From Mongolia? But, according to historical documents, the ancient Mongols were called "Oirats". There is no such nationality and there was not, until in 1823 it was introduced artificially!

The alternative history of Russia in those days is clearly reflected in the work of Alexei Kungurov. His book “There was no Kievan Rus, or what historians are hiding” caused thousands of controversies in scientific circles, but the arguments seem quite convincing even to those who are familiar with history, not to mention ordinary readers: “If we demand to present at least some material proof of longevity Mongol Empire, then the archaeologists, scratching their heads and grunting, will show a pair of half-rotted sabers and several women's earrings. But do not try to find out why the remains of sabers are "Mongol-Tatar" and not Cossack, for example. No one will explain this to you for sure. At best, you will hear a story that the saber was dug up at the place where, according to the version of the ancient and very reliable chronicle, there was a battle with the Mongols. Where is that chronicle? God knows it, it has not reached our days ”(c).

Although the theme is thoroughly revealed in the works of Gumilyov, Kalyuzhny and Fomenko, who are undoubtedly experts in their field, the alternative history reveals the Tatar-Mongol yoke in such a reasoned, detailed and thorough manner precisely at the suggestion of Kungurov. Undoubtedly, the author is thoroughly familiar with the timing of Kievan Rus and studied many sources before putting forward his theory regarding that time. That is why there is no doubt that his version of what is happening is the only possible chronology of events. Indeed, it is difficult to argue with a logically competent justification:

1. Not a single "material evidence" of the invasion of the Mongol-Tatars remained. Even from the dinosaurs, at least some traces remained, and from the whole yoke - zero. No written sources (of course, you should not take into account later fabricated papers), no architectural structures, no coin trace.
2. Analyzing modern linguistics, it will not be possible to find a single borrowing from the Mongol-Tatar heritage: the Mongolian and Russian languages ​​do not intersect, and there are no cultural borrowings from the Transbaikal nomads.
3. Even if Kievan Rus wanted to eradicate the difficult times of the dominance of the Mongol-Tatars from memory, at least some trace would remain in the folklore of the nomads. But even there - nothing!
4. What was the purpose of the capture? They reached the territory of Russia, captured ... and that's it? Was the conquest of the world limited to this? And the economic consequences for present-day Mongolia were never discovered: no Russian gold, no icons, no coins, in a word, nothing again.
5. For more than 3 centuries of imaginary dominance, not a single mixing of blood has occurred. One way or another, domestic population genetics did not find a single thread leading to the Mongol-Tatar roots.

These facts testify in favor of an alternative history of ancient Russia, in which there is not the slightest mention of the Tatar-Mongols as such. But why, over the course of several centuries, people were instilled with the opinion of the cruel attack of Batu? After all, something happened during these years that historians are trying to cover up with external interference. In addition, before the pseudo-liberation from the Mongol-Tatars, the territory of Russia was really in a huge decline, and the number of the local population decreased tenfold. So what happened during these years?

The alternative history of Russia offers many versions, but the most convincing seems to be forced baptism. According to ancient maps, the main part of the Northern Hemisphere was the Great State - Tartaria. Its inhabitants were educated and literate, they lived in harmony with themselves and with natural forces. Adhering to the Vedic worldview, they understood what was good, saw the consequences of planting a religious principle and tried to maintain their inner harmony. However, Kievan Rus - one of the provinces of the Great Tartaria - decided to take a different path.

Prince Vladimir, who became the ideological inspirer and executor of forced Christianization, understood that people’s deep convictions cannot be broken just like that, so he ordered to kill most adult population, and in innocent children's heads to put a religious beginning. And when the troops of Tartaria came to their senses and decided to stop the cruel bloodshed in Kievan Rus, it was already too late - the province at that time was a miserable sight. Of course, there was still a battle on the Kalka River, but the opponents were not a fictional Mongol corps, but their own army.

Looking at the alternative story about the war, it becomes clear why it was so "sluggish": the Russian troops, who forcibly converted to Christianity, perceived the Vedic army of Tartaria not as an attack, but rather as a liberation from the imposed religion. Many of them even went over to the side of the "enemy", while the rest did not see the point in the battle. But will such facts be printed in textbooks? After all, this discredits the modern idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe "great and wisest" power. IN Russian history there are many dark spots, as, indeed, in any state, but hiding them will not help to rewrite it.

An alternative history of Russia from ancient times: where did Tartaria go?

By the end of the 18th century, Great Tartaria was wiped out not only from the face of the Earth, but also from political map peace. This was done so carefully that there is no mention of it in any history textbook, in any chronicle and official paper. Why is it necessary to hide such an obvious fact of our history, which was revealed relatively recently, only thanks to the works of Academician Fomenko, who was engaged in New Chronology? But Guthrie William described Tartaria, its provinces and history in detail back in the 18th century, but this work remained unnoticed by official science. Everything is simple to the point of banal: the alternative history of Russia does not look as sacrificial and imposing as the academic one.

The conquest of Great Tartaria began in the 15th century, when Muscovy was the first to attack the surrounding territories. The army of Tartaria, which did not expect an attack, which at that time concentrated all its forces on protecting the external borders, did not have time to orient itself, and therefore yielded to the enemy. This served as an example for others, and gradually everyone sought to “bite off” at least a small piece of economically and politically profitable lands from Tartaria. So for 2 and a half centuries, only a weak shadow remained from the Great State, the final blow to which was the World War, referred to in the course of history as the “Pugachev Rebellion” in 1773-1775. After that, the name of the once great power began to gradually change to the Russian Empire, however, some regions - Independent and Chinese Tartaria - still managed to preserve their history for some more time.

Thus, the long war, which ultimately exterminated all the native Tartarians, began precisely with the filing of the Muscovites, who subsequently took an active part in it. This means that the area modern Russia was brutally recaptured at the cost of tens of thousands of lives, and our ancestors are precisely the attacking side. Will such textbooks be written? After all, if history is built on cruelty and bloodshed, then it is not as “wonderful” as they are trying to portray.

As a result, historians who adhere to the academic version simply took certain facts out of context, swapped the characters and presented everything “under the sauce” of the sad saga of devastation after the Tatar-Mongol yoke. In this perspective, there could be no talk of any attack on Tartaria. And what an alternative history of Tartaria, there was nothing. The maps are corrected, the facts are distorted, which means that you can forget about the rivers of blood. Such an approach made it possible to inspire many inhabitants, who were not accustomed to think and analyze, with exceptional integrity, sacrifice and, most importantly, the antiquity of their people. But in fact, all this was created by the hands of the Tartarians, who were subsequently destroyed.

An alternative history of St. Petersburg, or What is hidden in the chronicle of the Northern capital?

Petersburg is almost the main platform for the country's historical events, and the architecture of the city makes you breathless with delight and awe. But is everything as transparent and consistent as the official history shows?

The alternative history of St. Petersburg is based on the theory that the city at the mouth of the Neva was built in the 9th century BC, only it was called Nevograd. When Radabor built a port here, the settlement was renamed Vodin. A heavy share fell on local residents: the city was often flooded, and the enemies tried to capture the port area, causing devastation and bloodshed. In 862, after the death of Prince Vadim, the Novgorod prince who came to power destroyed the city almost to the ground, destroying everything indigenous people. Having recovered from this blow, after almost three centuries, the Vodinians met another attack - the Swedish one. True, after 30 years the Russian army was able to regain their native lands, but this time was enough to weaken Vodin.

After the suppression of the uprising in 1258, the city was renamed again - in order to pacify the recalcitrant Vodinians, Alexander Nevsky decided to eradicate his native name and began to call the city on the Neva Gorodnya. And after another 2 years, the Swedes again attacked the territory and named it in their own way - Landskron. Swedish dominance did not last long - in 1301 the city returned to Russia again, began to gradually flourish and recover.

Such an idyll lasted a little more than two and a half centuries - in 1570 Moskhi captured Gorodnya, calling it Kongrad. However, the Swedes did not give up their desire to get the port territory of the Neva, so in 1611 they were able to recapture the city, which has now become Kanets. After that, it was renamed one more time, calling Nyenschanz, until Peter I won it back from the Swedes during the Great Northern War. And only after that the official version of history begins the annals of St. Petersburg.

According to academic history, it was Peter the Great who built the city from scratch, created St. Petersburg the way it is today. However, the alternative history of Peter I does not look so impressive, because, in fact, he received a ready-made city with a long history into submission. It is enough to look at the numerous monuments allegedly erected in honor of the ruler in order to doubt their origins, because on each of them Peter I is depicted in completely different ways, and not always appropriate.

For example, the statue in the Mikhailovsky Castle depicts Peter the Great, dressed for some reason in a Roman tunic and sandals. A rather strange outfit for the realities of St. Petersburg at that time ... And the marshal's baton in an awkwardly twisted hand suspiciously resembles a spear, which for some reason (obviously why) was cut off, giving it the appropriate shape. And looking at the "Bronze Horseman", it becomes clear that the face is made in a completely different way. Age changes? Hardly. Just a fake historical heritage Petersburg, which was adjusted to suit academic history.

Alternative history review - answers to burning questions

Thoughtfully reading a school history textbook, it is impossible not to “stumble” over contradictions and imposed clichés. In addition, the revealed facts make us either constantly adjust the approved chronology for them, or hide historical events from people. But A. Sklyarov was right, stating: "If the facts contradict the theory, it is necessary to throw out the theory, not the facts." So why do historians act differently?

What to believe, which version to stick to, everyone decides for himself. Of course, it is much easier and more pleasant to close one's eyes to the obvious, proudly calling oneself a luminary in the field of historical sciences. Moreover, the novelties of alternative history are met with great distrust, calling them quackery and creative fiction. But each of these alleged fictions has much more logic and facts under it than academic science. But to admit this means to abandon an extremely convenient and advantageous position that has been promoted for decades. But if the official version continues to pass off fiction as reality, maybe it's time to stop being deceived ourselves? All you need to do this is to think for yourself.

"Before us, the Russian Land was not a thousand years, but many thousands of years,

and there will be more, for we have protected our Earth from enemies!"

Prince Kiy

Studying history home country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient number of materials that, in various aspects, cover the distant past of Russia. In the printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil. This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. This means that many of them are not satisfied with the current state of affairs in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science. But what does our science suggest? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Full course "(multimedia tutor for preparing for the exam, edition 2013).

In presenting this book, I will simply quote a few passages from it, which will allow you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept of the history of Russia, which our science offers. I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science. So I'm quoting...

"The ancient history of the Slavs contains a lot MYSTERIES(highlighted by the author and further), but from the standpoint of modern historians, it boils down to the following. First, in the III - the middle of the II millennium BC. e. SOME Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (perhaps from the peninsula of Asia Minor) moved to Europe. And further. “There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed (theories of the emergence of the Slavs): the Carpatho-Danubian theory was first put forward (the homeland of the Slavs is the area between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century. the Vistula-Oder theory was born and became the main one (the Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the Eastern Black Sea region was the ancestral home of the Slavs, and their ancestors were one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythians-plowmen. And so on. To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs produced in the book - “it comes from the words“ word ”and“ know ”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to“ Germans ”(as if dumb) - so the Slavs called foreigners. Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but all these arguments like - MYSTERIES, SOME, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do not satisfy me, but also suggest that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts. I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to sort it out and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity, and no certainty. Why does science not, and I have, although not complete, but extensive information about ancient history Russian people. And I set out my concept of Russian history in the manuscript "On the Ancient History of Russia." Is there really not a single patriot among our Russian historians, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and who would professionally unravel the “riddles” posed by science. Otherwise, it is not science. What I have presented to you above cannot be called science. Where in the word SLAVES is there or is the meaning "word" ??? Where can we conclude that the word SLAVES has the meaning "to know" ??? SLAVIES means "glorious". This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). And that's why "glorious", this must be dealt with. But we have an answer to this question.

In the same place in the book "History. Full course" explained VERSIONS the origin of the word "Rus": "... either from the name of the Ros River - the right tributary of the Dnieper (this version is proposed academician B. Rybakov, but today it is considered obsolete), either from the name of the Varangians (according to the annals of Nestor), or from the word “roots”, which means “ship rowers”, which was then transformed into “ruotsi” (modern version)”. Dear gentlemen, scientists - be afraid of God! Talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that our children are stuffed with all this, deliberately forming in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The book below notes. “The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the 12th century. - the first Russian chronicle (the oldest surviving) - "The Tale of Bygone Years", the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora monastery Nestor around 1113. And on this “document” (why in quotation marks it will be clear a little later) academic science builds its concept of the history of Russia. Yes, there are many other interesting documents that cover our ancient history. But for some reason, it is the chronicle of Nestor that is the main one for academicians. Let's see what historians rely on in their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod. In 859, the northern Slavic tribes drove the Varangians-Normans (“northern people”) overseas, immigrants from Scandinavia, who shortly before imposed tribute on them. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to "reign". The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar clans. To this point of view, we put forward here our counterarguments that refute the dogmas of academic science:

The Russian princely dynasty was born long before the appearance of Rurik in Novgorod. Before that, Gostomysl ruled there, who was the 19th (!!!) prince from the famous prince Vandal (Vandalarius - born in 365)

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of the middle daughter of Gostomysl), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After the death of Gostomysl, his eldest grandson Vadim sat down to reign there. And Rurik was invited only to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Russia, with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

It would not occur to a single sane person to invite an unfamiliar person who has nothing to do with the current dynasty of princes, and even more so from some Normans who had just been expelled from the country across the sea and who were paid tribute.

All presented arguments will be revealed a little later. But even this is enough to demonstrate that the “most important source” of academic science does not correspond in its content to real events. It can also be briefly added to this for the time being that Dir and Askold had nothing to do with Rurik, they were not Varangians, let alone brothers, as our historical science presents us.

What is the "Tale of Bygone Years"? This is most likely a literary work, not a chronicle. The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Russia by Prince Vladimir of the Rurik dynasty. All events before the baptism prepare the reader for this culmination, all subsequent events remind of its importance. Russia, as it were, emerges from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism. The author of The Tale is little interested in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at that time, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and legends, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved since those times that we will further build real story ancient Russia. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, in other words, he was fulfilling someone's order.

Move on. Since the chronicle speaks of the events of the 12th century, the author lived no earlier. But at the same time, the question arises: how could the author, living in a Kiev monastery in the 12th century, know what was in the 9th century in Veliky Novgorod, given the enormous difficulties of the then roads and the “illiteracy” of the whole country? There is only one answer - no way! And therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple writing from the words of other people or according to rumors and later times. And this is convincingly proved in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “The Forgotten History of Russia”. It says that “the oldest of all the lists of the Tale of Bygone Years, Radzivilovskiy, was made only at the beginning of the 17th century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet”. And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge??? And it will be even more surprising for the reader to find out at the same time that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world, our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom there have long been rumors in well-known circles that the Tsar is “not real”. I mean the moment of the “substitution” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while all the rest either died or disappeared into prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it.

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the chronicle, which concerns the puberty of our ancestors. It turns out that compared with other princely dynasties, such as Germany and England, "our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their life." This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that "it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable."

There are other important points related to the content of the chronicle. For example, in the annals of Nestor, information about comets, eclipses of the moon and the sun was not noted or shifted in time. Also in the annals there is no information about the Crusades and, especially, about the "liberation of the Holy Sepulcher from the hands of the infidels." “What monk would not rejoice over this and would not devote not one, but many pages to this day as a joyful event for the entire Christian world?” But if the chronicler did not see the celestial eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called "initial chronicle" passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha", i.e. works, the authorship of which is not confirmed and is unlikely. Here are the things.

Let us also refer to the opinion of our first historian V. Tatishchev. He noted that "all Russian historians revered Nestor, the chronicler, as the first and main writer." But V. Tatishchev did not understand why Nestor himself did not mention any ancient authors, including Bishop Joachim. V. Tatishchev was sure, and according to the legends, it was clear that the ancient stories were written, but did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor. And it is quite doubtless, according to V. Tatishchev, that Polish authors had (i.e. existed) Joachim’s story, since many cases were not mentioned by Nestor, but northern (Polish) authors did. V. Tatishchev also noted that “all the manuscripts that he had, although they had a beginning from Nestor, but in the continuation, none of them exactly converged with the other, in one thing, in another the other was added or reduced.”

E. Klassen analyzed in detail the question of what is the basis of the conviction about the beginning of the independence of the Russian people or about its statehood only from the time of Rurik's calling. On the annals of Nestor or on the conclusion about his legend L. Schlozer. From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clearly and undoubtedly clear that the tribes that called the Varangians led a political, state life, since they already constituted an alliance, a community of 4 tribes - Russia, Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, occupying up to 1 million square miles in northeastern corner of Europe and had cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl. The Bavarian geographer counted 148 (!) Cities near Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, living on such a stretch, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed by Russia, Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And most importantly, savages do not have cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his research. He noted that “Nestor wrote not so much the history of Russia or southern Russia as the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joakimov and 3rd Novgorod chronicles shows, Nestor deliberately narrowed his history. He almost passed over in silence the history of northern, i.e., Novgorod Rus. He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include a description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Russia, which had nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Olegovian Russia could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons who were clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism.” And also: “Nestor kept silent about this reign (of Gostomysl), only mentioning the fact itself. And you can understand why: he wrote the annals of the southern, Kievan, Rus, and the history of the north did not interest him. This led him away from the tasks assigned to him by the church. This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg the first prince in Russia. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if it were not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental principle of our state history according to academic science is "The Tale of Bygone Years", which, in fact, is a falsified document - a fake. This state of affairs with our history was further consolidated by foreigners called by sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know Russian, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived. Academician L. Schlozer (1735 - 1809) can serve as the clearest example. Let's imagine one of Shlozer's "inferences" regarding the most ancient Russian history ( We are talking about the 7th century!): “A terrible emptiness reigns everywhere in central and northern Russia. Nowhere is the slightest trace of the cities that adorn Russia today. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where now beautiful fields delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before this there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where now enlightened people united in peaceful societies, there lived before this wild animals and semi-wild people.

Let us briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. Admit, that Novgorod princes older than the Ruriks, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik, was considered unacceptable. This undermined the Rurikovich's right to primordial power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, which laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov. In the same way, Nestor also ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions. That is why The Tale of Bygone Years can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and create a real true history of our state in the shortest possible time. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

On the facts of ancient Russian history and statehood among the Rus, we previously prepared two manuscripts: “On the Ancient History of Russia” and “The History of the Russ according to the Book of Veles”. It presents convincing evidence of the high culture of the ancient Slavs and the existence of statehood among our ancestors long before the arrival of Rurik in Novgorod. In this study, it is supposed to continue work in this direction in order to present a variant of the history of the Russian people from ancient times according to the actual data. In this work, we will rely mainly on chronicle materials that were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: "The Legend of Slovenia and Rus",

"The genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov", "Tales of Zaharikha" and other.

About the sources used

When considering the issue of the ancient history of Russia, in our opinion, we must proceed from the following two very important points that directly affect the construction of the history of ancient Rus, and as a result, our correct perception of this history.

First, The Tale of Bygone Years is not an authentic document and cannot be considered as the main source on the history of ancient Russia. This is a document deliberately fabricated by the "authors", which, moreover, was subsequently clearly edited.

Second, The immediate history of the Rus begins 4500 years ago, when a new haplotype arose as a result of a mutation on the Russian Plain, an identifier of the male gender, which on this moment have up to 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. With this in mind, we will try further with a certain degree of probability, of course (the truth is not achievable), to show the reader the real history of our ancestors, which will be based on a sufficient number historical facts. We will take the necessary information from the historical sources we have identified. As such sources, we once again note: “The Legend of Slovena and Rus and the city of Slovensk”, the Joachim Chronicle, “Veles book”, “The genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov ”, “Tales of Zaharikha”, “Budinsky Izbornik”.

Ancient Russia has never been a specialization of Marcel Ivanovich. But it was during this period that someone's evil will abandoned him. Slavic Magi still represent a formidable force, dashing people on the roads do whatever they want, any mistake can cost a life. How can a city dweller survive in such conditions?

I am my own friend!

He was born with the blessing of the God of Wars and named after his father's sword. He killed the first enemy at the age of nine, and at fourteen he passed the Perun initiation and put on a military grivna. With his mother's milk, he absorbed hatred for the damned Khazar yoke and is ready to give his life for liberation. native land from "who...

A new pagan thriller from the best-selling author of Svyatoslav the Brave, Evpaty Kolovrat and Pagan Russia! The Slavic tribes, united under the banner of the great Svyatoslav, are throwing off the hated Khazar yoke! Holy Kolovrat against the damned star! The Russian army that blocked the Wild Field of Chervl ...

A new fantastic action movie from the author of the best-selling books Time Detachment, Time Penal Battalion and Submarine Navigator! An alien from the future floats downstream of Eternity - from the 21st century to the 15th century. Rescue of drowning "popadants" is the work of the "popadants" themselves! Nearly sinking these days, he...

Missing

The book is an author's reflection on the origins and fate of Russian Civilization, on its genetic place on the Eurasian continent, on its confrontation with the Civilization of the West, and directly on its bearer - namely, the Russian people. The Russian people in the book are opposed to alien power...

Missing

Dear reader, you have just taken into your hands a book that contains by no means knowledge, but a rather gloomy story about how a person has to fight his eternal enemy day after day, year after year, for many centuries. known as fear. Now any of our actions ...

People forgot the old pokon, rejected their gods. So now they live according to foreign laws, worship someone else's faith. Having betrayed once, you will betray also the second. Maybe that's why the Russian people live in hardships and hardships? What should be done to prevent the wrong choice? Where to throw a stone on the trodden ...

What will you decide if you have a time machine at your disposal that opens a portal to 881? Would you take a selfie with Oleg Veshchim? But Igor Tuchin has much grander plans! He wants to help the prince train a powerful regular army, beat the Khazars, start industrialization, bring out his ancestral…

Waking up in an unfamiliar forest, what will you do? Most likely, at first you will try to understand - where are you? And what to do to get to habitable places? So Vladimir, realizing that he was in a strange forest at another time, begins to ask himself questions. Why and why was he here? Where is the path...

Missing

“... Whoever did not come to the spacious princely tower, cut down recently on the top of a picturesque hill in the heart of the Kiev mountains. Slavic princes came from the lands of the Krivichi and Vyatichi, Novgorod Slovenes and Radimichi, from the Drevlyansk forests and meadows of the Tivertsy; the feud with Oleg was left behind, ...

Missing

Podії, like trapleyayutsya in the context of history chi in the life of a great person - is it regularity or volatility? What do we care about our fillings and choice, how do we sew the fabric of the past and future? Chi skin c…

Missing

Ladoga, late 9th century. Voivode Domagosta has three daughters. The eldest, Yaromila, Lele of Volkhov, is destined to meet with Prince Odd Haleig: this is how the one who will be called Prophetic Oleg appears in Russia. The middle one, Divlyana, fell in love with the Pskov prince Volga, but at this time, matchmakers come to Ladoga, wishing ...

Missing

"Shoot Batu!" - the first thing that comes to mind to our contemporary, abandoned with a sniper rifle in the era of the Tatar-Mongol invasion. But will the "hitman" be able to get close to the khan's stake on an aimed shot? And most importantly - will the death of the great conqueror stop the steppe avalanche? Or …

NEW book from the best-selling author of "Black Archaeologist from the Future" and "Filibuster of Time"! A continuation of the adventures of our contemporary, abandoned in the 17th century and becoming a Cossack, a pirate of the Black Sea, a fighter of the steppe hordes and Ottoman slave traders. You say, “We don’t need the Turkish coast”? Damn…

The owner of a large St. Petersburg PR agency, Vasily Zubov, decided to hunt wolves. How was the PR man to know that the gray predator he liked was not a beast at all, but an insidious sorcerer Prostomir? And was it not his charms that Vasily was transported to the alternative Ancient Russia exactly at the beginning of the election campaign ...

IX century. Ancient Russia. Leaving her home, the red-haired beauty Divlyana, betrothed to Prince Askold, was afraid to even imagine what awaits her on the long journey from Ladoga to Kyiv. Saving Divlyana from the encroachments of the prince of the Krivichi Stanislav, her brother Velem found another girl, a slave, and slipped her S ...

He was a useless invalid who felt that his life was coming to an end. But fate gave him a second chance to start over, and retired FSB officer Vadim Sokolov finds himself in the past. Twelfth century. He is young and strong again. But where should he go, and what should he do? Can …

The war continues. Once again, the Catholics are gathering huge armies of crusaders and are trying to defeat the Venedian Union. Cities are burning again and crops are being trampled, women and children are crying, and men with weapons in their hands meet enemies and die in battles. To survive, the Wends need the help of allies, and Vitya ...

If at the height of the war against the Poles during the siege of Smolensk, Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich fell seriously ill - who will save him from certain death? The English court doctor only knows how to bleed. And then the HEALER FROM THE FUTURE, abandoned in the Moscow Kingdom from our time, comes to the rescue. But vy…

New adventures of our contemporary in the distant past. The courier of the government communications of the Russian Federation, abandoned in Ancient Russia, changes his profession. He will become a combatant of the Moscow prince and Novgorod ushkuin, serve at the border outpost and go on sea voyages against the Swedes, assaults ...

He was transferred 1000 years into the past by the will of the pagan gods in order to lead an uprising against the Christians who baptized Russia with "fire and sword." Finding himself in the XI century from the birth of Christ, he took the name RATIBOR in honor of the hero of his favorite novel, made an alliance with the Magi and led the pagans into battle. But is it possible to…

Missing

Kievan Rus, 997. On the edge of the Pecheneg steppe, Prince Vladimir built Belgorod - a shield city that shielded the Russian land. The foreman Yavor is the first daring man in the city, respected by the squad and beloved by the governor, and only the spoiled and frivolous beauty Medvyanka does not want to recognize his worth ...

In the bloody reign of Ivan the Terrible, the guardsmen were popularly nicknamed pitchmen - they instilled such absolute horror in the country. But our contemporary, abandoned in this merciless epoch, will himself arrange a pitch hell for the tsar's punishers! He will shoot the guardsmen like mad dogs. It will become a mystery...

Battles with the steppes on the borders of the Wild Field and a campaign against Lithuania, battles with English pirates and the storming of Smolensk - fate continues to test the strength of our contemporary, abandoned in the Moscow Kingdom. Awarded for his faithful service by the boyar rank, he takes fencing lessons to become ...

A new thriller about the prehistory of Russia and the exploits of our distant ancestors. Slavic tribes unite around the sacred temple of Perun, creating the first Russian state - Ruskolan. But in order to become the heirs of the great Scythian state, the Rus must rise up against the nomadic Huns and throw off hatred ...

Slavic Kolovrat against the Khazar star. Russian squads against countless hordes. An indestructible wall of scarlet shields against the Wild Field. Having united under the banner of Prince Svyatoslav, the Slavic tribes throw off the hated Khazar yoke. The formidable battle cry of the Rus drowns out the heart-rending screech of the steppe...

The Urals of the middle of the first millennium of our era, where the Slavs, the Volga Bulgars and the Finno-Ugric peoples coexist. As a result scientific experiment a former investigator with an engineering education and experience as a production worker was thrown here. But they didn’t expect a stranger here… Having survived several battles with abor…

„Before us, the land of Rus was not a thousand years old,
but there were many thousands, and there will be more,
for we have guarded our land from enemies!”

Prince Kiy

INTRODUCTION

Being engaged in the study of the history of my native country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient number of materials that illuminate the distant past of Russia in various aspects.

In the printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil.

This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. Means, many of them are not satisfied with the status quo in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science.

But what does our science suggest? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Full course "(multimedia tutor for preparing for the exam, edition 2013).

In introducing this book, I will simply quote a few passages from it that will enable you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept of the history of Russia, offered by our the science . I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science.

So I'm quoting...

« The ancient history of the Slavs contains a lot MYSTERIES (highlighted by the author and further), but from the standpoint of modern historians, it boils down to the following.

First, in the III - the middle of the II millennium BC. SOME Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (possibly from the peninsula of Asia Minor) moved to Europe».

And further. " There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed.(theories of the emergence of the Slavs): the first was put forward by the Carpatho-Danubian theory(homeland of the Slavs - the area between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century was born and became the main Vistula-Oder theory(Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the Eastern Black Sea region was the ancestral home of the Slavs, and their ancestors are one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythians-plowmen». Etc.

To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs produced in the book - “comes from the words“ word ”and“ know ”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to“ Germans ”(as if dumb) - this is how the Slavs called foreigners” . Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but all these arguments like - MYSTERIES, SOME, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do not satisfy, but also suggest that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts.

I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to sort it out and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity, and no certainty. Why does science not, and I have, although not complete, but extensive information about the ancient history of the Russian people. And I set out my concept of Russian history in the manuscript "On the Ancient History of Russia."

Is there really not a single patriot among our Russian historians, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and who would professionally unravel the “riddles” posed by science. Otherwise, it is not science. What I have presented to you above cannot be called science.

Where in the word SLAVS Is there or is the meaning of "word"??? How can you conclude that there is SLAVS meanings of "know"??? SLAVS means "glorious". This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). And that's why "glorious", this must be dealt with. But we have an answer to this question.

In the same place in the book "History. Full course" explained VERSIONS origin of the word "Rus": ":... or from the name of the river Ros - the right tributary of the Dnieper(this version was proposed by academician B. Rybakov, but today it is considered obsolete), or from the name of the Varangians(according to the chronicle of Nestor), or from the word roots, which means"ship rowers" which was then converted to"ruotsi" (modern version)."

Dear gentlemen, scientists - be afraid of God! Talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that our children are stuffed with all this, deliberately forming in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The book below notes. " The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the XII century. - the first Russian chronicle(the oldest surviving) - "The Tale of Bygone Years", the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora monastery Nestor around 1113.". And on this "document"(why in quotes will be clear a bit later) academic science is building its own concept of the history of Russia.

Yes, there are many other interesting documents that cover our ancient history. But for some reason, it is the chronicle of Nestor that is the main one for academicians.

Let's see what historians rely on in their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod.

In 859, the northern Slavic tribes drove the Varangians-Normans (“northern people”) overseas, immigrants from Scandinavia, who shortly before imposed tribute on them. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to "reign". The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar clans.

To this point of view, we put forward our counterarguments here, refuting the dogmas of academic science:

The Russian princely dynasty was born long before the appearance of Rurik in Novgorod. Before that, Gostomysl ruled there, who was the 19th (!!!) prince from the famous prince Vandal (Vandalary - born in 365)

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of the middle daughter of Gostomysl), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After the death of Gostomysl, his eldest grandson Vadim sat down to reign there. And Rurik was invited only to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Russia, with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

It would not occur to a single sane person to invite an unfamiliar person who has nothing to do with the current dynasty of princes, and even more so from some Normans who had just been expelled from the country across the sea and who were paid tribute.

All presented arguments will be revealed a little later. But even this is enough to demonstrate that the “most important source” of academic science does not correspond in its content to real events. It can also be briefly added to this for the time being that Dir and Askold had nothing to do with Rurik, they were not Varangians, let alone brothers, as our historical science presents us.

What is the "Tale of Bygone Years"? This is most likely a literary work, not a chronicle.

The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Russia by Prince Vladimir of the Rurik dynasty. All events before the baptism prepare the reader for this climax, all subsequent events remind of its importance. Russia, as it were, emerges from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism.

The author of The Tale is little interested in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at that time, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and legends, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved since those times that we will further build the real history of ancient Russia. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, in other words, he was fulfilling someone's order.

Move on. Since the chronicle speaks of the events of the 12th century, the author lived no earlier. But at the same time, the question arises: how could the author, living in a Kiev monastery in the 12th century, know what happened in Veliky Novgorod in the 9th century, given the enormous difficulties of the then roads and the “illiteracy” of the whole country?

There is only one answer - no way! !! And therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple writing from the words of other people or according to rumors and later times. And this is convincingly proved in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “The Forgotten History of Russia”.

It says that “the oldest of all the copies of The Tale of Bygone Years” - Radzivilovskiy - was made only at the beginning of the 17th century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet”. And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge???

And it will be even more surprising for the reader to find out at the same time that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world, our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom there have long been rumors in well-known circles that the Tsar is “not real”. I mean the moment of the “substitution” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while all the rest either died or disappeared into prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it.

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the annals, which concerns the puberty of our ancestors.

It turns out that compared with other princely dynasties, such as Germany and England, "our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their life." This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that "it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable."

There are other important points related to the content of the chronicle. For example, in the annals of Nestor, information about comets, eclipses of the moon and the sun was not noted or shifted in time. Also in the annals there is no information about the Crusades and, especially, about the "liberation of the Holy Sepulcher from the hands of the infidels." " What monk would not rejoice over this and would not devote not one, but many pages to this day as a joyful event for the entire Christian world?»

But if the chronicler did not see the celestial eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called "initial chronicle" passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha", i.e. works, the authorship of which is not confirmed and is unlikely. Here are the things.

Let us also refer to the opinion of our first historian V. Tatishchev. He noted that "all Russian historians revered Nestor, the chronicler, as the first and main writer." But V. Tatishchev did not understand why Nestor himself did not mention any ancient authors, including Bishop Joachim.

V. Tatishchev was sure, and according to the legends, it was clear that the ancient stories were written, but did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor.

And it is quite undoubted, according to V. Tatishchev, that Polish authors had (i.e., existed) Joachim’s story, since many cases were not mentioned by Nestor, but northern (Polish) authors did. V. Tatishchev also noted that “ all the manuscripts that he had, although they had a beginning from Nestor, but in the continuation, none of them exactly converged with the other, one thing, another added or reduced ».

E. Klassen analyzed in detail the question of what is the basis of the conviction about the beginning of the independence of the Russian people or about its statehood only from the time of Rurik's calling. On the annals of Nestor or on the conclusion about his legend L. Schlozer.

From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clear and undoubtedly evident that the tribes that called the Varangians, lead a political life, state, since they already made up a union, a community of 4 tribes - Russia, Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, occupying up to 1 million square miles in the northeastern corner of Europe and having cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl.

The Bavarian geographer counted 148 (!) Cities of the Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, living on such a stretch, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed by Russia, Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And the most important thing, savages don't have cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his research. He noted that " Nestor wrote not so much the history of Russia or southern Russia as the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joakimov and 3rd Novgorod chronicles shows, Nestor deliberately narrowed his history. The history of the northern, i.e. Novgorod Russia, he almost passed over in silence.

He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include a description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Russia, which has nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Olegovian Russia could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons who were clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism ».

As well as: " Nestor kept silent about this reign(Gostomysl), just mentioning the fact. And you can understand why: he wrote the annals of the southern, Kievan, Rus, and the history of the north did not interest him. It took him away from the tasks assigned to him by the church.

This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg the first prince in Russia. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if it were not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental basis of our state history in academic science is the Tale of Bygone Years, which, in fact, is falsified document - forgery.

We consolidated this state of affairs with our history. Foreigners called by sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know Russian, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived.

Academician L. Schlozer (1735 - 1809) can serve as the clearest example. Let's imagine one of Shlozer's "inferences" regarding the most ancient Russian history (we are talking about the 7th century!!!):

« A terrible void reigns everywhere in central and northern Russia. Nowhere is the slightest trace of cities that now adorn Russia. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where now beautiful fields delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before this there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where now enlightened people united in peaceful societies, there lived before this wild animals and half-wild people ».

Let us briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. Recognize that the Novgorod princes are older than the Rurikovichs, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik, was considered unacceptable.

This undermined the Rurikovich's right to primordial power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, which laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov.

In the same way, Nestor ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions.

That's why "The Tale of Bygone Years" can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and in the shortest possible time to create a real true story our state. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

On the facts of ancient Russian history and statehood among the Rus, we previously prepared two manuscripts: “On the Ancient History of Russia” and “The History of the Russ according to the Book of Veles”.

It presents convincing evidence of the high culture of the ancient Slavs and the existence of statehood among our ancestors long before the arrival of Rurik in Novgorod. In this study, it is supposed to continue work in this direction in order to present a variant of the history of the Russian people from ancient times according to the actual data.

In this work, we will rely mainly on chronicle materials that were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: "The Legend of Slovenia and Rus", "Veles Book", "Budinsky Izbornik", "Genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, its kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov", "Tales of Zahariha" and others.

***

You can download the book.